Hima Kohli

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Limited vs. Union of India (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 30, Arbitration Law with Section 33, Hima Kohli, Judges, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Limited vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view, especially on issues of contract termination and compensation for idle machinery. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Limited vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 30, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 70, Hima Kohli, Judges, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940, by re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view, particularly on matters of contract interpretation, extension of time, and idle

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Contract Termination and Idle Hire Charges: Atlanta Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Committee to Investigate Prime Minister’s Security Breach: Lawyers Voice vs. State of Punjab (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Hima Kohli, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Provisions related to security of the Prime Minister, Public Interest Litigation, Security of Prime Minister, Special Protection Group Act, 1988, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Appoints Committee to Investigate Prime Minister’s Security Breach: Lawyers Voice vs. State of Punjab (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Inquiry into security breach of the Prime Minister. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation. Case Name: Lawyers Voice vs. State of Punjab & Others. [Judgment Date]: January 12, 2022 Date of the Judgment: January 12, 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court Appoints Committee to Investigate Prime Minister’s Security Breach: Lawyers Voice vs. State of Punjab (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) INSC 24

/ A.S. Bopanna, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 2, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498-A, Judges, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) INSC 24 LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “dowry” and “cruelty” in dowry death cases under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Dowry Death Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh vs.

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) INSC 24 Read Post »

Supreme Court Expands Dowry Definition in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) INSC 30

/ A. S. Bopanna, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 2, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Expands Dowry Definition in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) INSC 30 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the demand for money to construct a house constitutes a dowry demand under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law (Dowry Death) Case Name: State of Madhya

Supreme Court Expands Dowry Definition in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) INSC 30 Read Post »

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 2, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Relating to Marriage

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “dowry” under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Dowry Death Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jogendra & Anr. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Allotment of Commercial Plot: Velagacharla Jayaram Reddy vs. M.Venkata Ramana (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Allotment of Plots, Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964, Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 with Section 61, Cooperative Society Law, Disputes in Cooperative Societies, Hima Kohli, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Society Rules

Supreme Court Upholds Allotment of Commercial Plot: Velagacharla Jayaram Reddy vs. M.Venkata Ramana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plot of land within a cooperative society layout, designated as a commercial area, can be reclassified as a parking area based on assumptions and without clear demarcation in the layout plan. CASE TYPE: Cooperative Society Dispute Case

Supreme Court Upholds Allotment of Commercial Plot: Velagacharla Jayaram Reddy vs. M.Venkata Ramana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bail for Most Accused, Cancels Bail for One in NDPS Case (2022)

/ Bail, Criminal Law, Drug Trafficking, Hima Kohli, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 37, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 67, Offences under NDPS Act, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Bail for Most Accused, Cancels Bail for One in NDPS Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail can be granted to individuals accused of offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) based on confessional statements and whether the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were correctly

Supreme Court Upholds Bail for Most Accused, Cancels Bail for One in NDPS Case (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Dismisses State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 31(7)(a), Arbitration Law with Section 34, Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Hima Kohli, Judges, Merger of Agreements, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Dismisses State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can award compound interest and whether a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) merges into an Implementation Agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Dismisses State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Rejects State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(7)(b), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Arbitration Law, Compound Interest in Arbitration, Hima Kohli, Judges, Merger of Agreements, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Rejects State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can award compound interest and whether a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) merges into an Implementation Agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of

Supreme Court Upholds Compound Interest in Arbitration, Rejects State’s Appeal: UHL Power Company Ltd. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Manipur University’s Reservation Policy: Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar Singh vs. Manipur University (2022)

/ Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006, Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 with Section 2, Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 with Section 3, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Sixth Schedule, Hima Kohli, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds Manipur University’s Reservation Policy: Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar Singh vs. Manipur University (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of reservation policies for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) in Central Educational Institutions (CEIs), particularly in the North-Eastern region of India. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal, Educational Law Case Name: Shri Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar

Supreme Court Upholds Manipur University’s Reservation Policy: Kshetrimayum Maheshkumar Singh vs. Manipur University (2022) Read Post »

Dowry Death: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Husband, Acquits Mother-in-law in Fulwa Devi Case (17 December 2021)

/ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 2, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction of Husband, Acquits Mother-in-law LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused were guilty of dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Parvati Devi vs. The State of Bihar now State of Jharkhand & Ors. Judgment Date: 17 December 2021. Introduction Date of

Dowry Death: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Husband, Acquits Mother-in-law in Fulwa Devi Case (17 December 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top