J B Pardiwala

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of limitation period for appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr vs. APG Logistics Private Limited [Judgment Date]: May 1, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for IBC Appeals: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for appeals under IBC: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023)

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for appeals under IBC: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct calculation of the limitation period for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr vs. APG Logistics Private Limited [Judgment Date]: 1

Supreme Court clarifies limitation for appeals under IBC: Sanket Kumar Agarwal vs. APG Logistics (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Dispute Case: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi (2023)

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Dispute Case: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi (2023) Date of the Judgment: 1 May 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI and J B Pardiwala, J. Can a matrimonial dispute case be transferred to a court more convenient for the wife? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Dispute Case: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Convenience: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi (2023)

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Convenience: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Transfer of matrimonial proceedings from one family court to another for the convenience of the parties. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial/Family Law. Case Name: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi. [Judgment Date]: May 1, 2023 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Transfers Matrimonial Case for Convenience: Nitu Devi Somvanshi vs. Rajendra Singh Somvanshi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (17 April 2023)

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) could fell more trees than initially permitted by the Supreme Court for the Mumbai Metro Line-3 project. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case

Supreme Court Allows Felling of Trees for Mumbai Metro Project, Imposes Fine: In Re: Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) (17 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Felling of 177 Trees for Mumbai Metro Project Despite Initial Order

Supreme Court Allows Felling of 177 Trees for Mumbai Metro Project Despite Initial Order LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) could fell more trees than initially permitted by the Supreme Court for the Metro Car Shed Land at Aarey Colony. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: In Re: Felling of

Supreme Court Allows Felling of 177 Trees for Mumbai Metro Project Despite Initial Order Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Guidelines to Prevent Unnecessary Hysterectomies: Dr. Narendra Gupta vs. Union of India (2023)

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Guidelines to Prevent Unnecessary Hysterectomies: Dr. Narendra Gupta vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Prevention of unnecessary hysterectomies and ensuring women’s health rights. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (Healthcare) Case Name: Dr. Narendra Gupta vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 5, 2023 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Guidelines to Prevent Unnecessary Hysterectomies: Dr. Narendra Gupta vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mandatory e-filing of pleadings at Debt Recovery Tribunals and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals is justified, considering the digital divide in India. CASE TYPE: Writ Petition (Civil) – Service Law, Technology Law, and Procedural Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mandatory e-filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) is valid, considering the digital divide in the country. CASE TYPE: Civil, focused on procedural aspects of debt recovery

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Open Ballot System for Rajya Sabha Elections: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India (27 March 2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Open Ballot System for Rajya Sabha Elections: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the open ballot system for Rajya Sabha elections and the requirement for independent candidates to have ten proposers are constitutionally valid. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Election Law Case Name: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Upholds Open Ballot System for Rajya Sabha Elections: Lok Prahari vs. Union of India (27 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds CLAT Scribe Restrictions for Exam Integrity (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds CLAT Scribe Restrictions for Exam Integrity (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether restrictions on scribes for the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) are valid for candidates with disabilities. CASE TYPE: Disability Rights Law, Education Law Case Name: Arnab Roy vs. Consortium of National Law Universities & Anr. Judgment Date: 17 March 2023 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds CLAT Scribe Restrictions for Exam Integrity (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies: Arbitration Clause in Amenities Agreement extends to Leave and License Agreement

Supreme Court Clarifies Incorporation of Arbitration Clauses in Linked Agreements Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 232 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J, J B Pardiwala, J Can an arbitration clause in one agreement be considered part of another agreement if the two are linked? The Supreme

Supreme Court clarifies: Arbitration Clause in Amenities Agreement extends to Leave and License Agreement Read Post »

Scroll to Top