J B Pardiwala

Supreme Court settles pensionable service calculation after resignation withdrawal in service law: Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor vs. State of Gujarat (27 February 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Pensionable Service, Service Law, Service Law with Resignation

Supreme Court Rules on Pensionable Service After Resignation Withdrawal: Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor vs. State of Gujarat (2023) Date of the Judgment: 27 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No 24 of 2013 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J, J B Pardiwala, J. Can a government employee be denied full pension benefits if […]

Supreme Court settles pensionable service calculation after resignation withdrawal in service law: Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor vs. State of Gujarat (27 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court penalizes Medical College for defying stay order: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) INSC 102

/ Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 11, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court penalizes Medical College for defying stay order: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) INSC 102 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a medical college can admit students after the Supreme Court has stayed the High Court’s order permitting such admissions. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Medical Admissions Case Name: National Medical Commission

Supreme Court penalizes Medical College for defying stay order: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) INSC 102 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Medical College Penalty for Unauthorized Admissions: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 with Section 11, J B Pardiwala, Judges, National Medical Commission Act, 2019, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Powers of National Medical Commission, Recognition of Medical Qualifications, Regulation of Medical Education

Supreme Court Upholds Medical College Penalty for Unauthorized Admissions: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a medical college can admit students after a stay order from the Supreme Court, and what are the consequences for such actions? CASE TYPE: Education Law, Medical Admissions Case Name: National Medical

Supreme Court Upholds Medical College Penalty for Unauthorized Admissions: National Medical Commission vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “Charitable Purpose” under the Kerala Building Tax Act: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) INSC 98 (9 February 2023)

/ Charitable Purpose, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 with Section 3(1)(b), Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Tax Exemption

Supreme Court Clarifies “Charitable Purpose” Under Kerala Building Tax Act Date of the Judgment: 9 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 98 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J, J B Pardiwala, J Can the term “charitable purpose” be narrowly defined only as “relief of the poor and free medical relief” under the

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “Charitable Purpose” under the Kerala Building Tax Act: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) INSC 98 (9 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Company Secretary in Buyback Compliance: SEBI vs. V Shankar (2023)

/ Buyback of Securities, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 215, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 68, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 77A, Compliance Officer, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, Securities Law

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Company Secretary in Buyback Compliance: SEBI vs. V Shankar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of responsibility of a Company Secretary in ensuring compliance with buyback regulations. CASE TYPE: Securities Law Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. V Shankar Judgment Date: 8 February 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court clarifies the role of Company Secretary in Buyback Compliance: SEBI vs. V Shankar (2023) Read Post »

Aggregator Licensing and Non-Transport Vehicle Pooling: Supreme Court Addresses Maharashtra’s Regulatory Framework (7 February 2023)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 2(1A), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 93, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 96, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Addresses Aggregator Licensing and Non-Transport Vehicle Pooling in Maharashtra LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the licensing of aggregators under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the permissibility of pooling non-transport vehicles by these aggregators. CASE TYPE: This case falls under the ambit of transportation law and regulatory compliance. Case Name:

Aggregator Licensing and Non-Transport Vehicle Pooling: Supreme Court Addresses Maharashtra’s Regulatory Framework (7 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Uniform Application of Premature Release Policies in Uttar Pradesh

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 161, Criminal Law, Criminal Law with Section 433A, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Premature Release

Supreme Court Directs Uniform Application of Premature Release Policies in Uttar Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring uniform application of premature release policies for life convicts. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Rajkumar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh. [Judgment Date]: 6 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 6 February 2023. Citation: (Not Available in the document). Judges:

Supreme Court Directs Uniform Application of Premature Release Policies in Uttar Pradesh Read Post »

Supreme Court directs uniform application of premature release policy in Uttar Pradesh: Rajkumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 718 (6 February 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 432, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 433A, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 161, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Premature Release, Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Act, 1938, Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Act, 1938 with Rule 4

Supreme Court directs uniform application of premature release policy in Uttar Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State of Uttar Pradesh was applying a uniform policy for premature release of convicts CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rajkumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Judgment Date: 6 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 6 February 2023 Citation: (2023)

Supreme Court directs uniform application of premature release policy in Uttar Pradesh: Rajkumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) INSC 718 (6 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of Contesting from Two Seats in Elections: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 19, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 33(7)

Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of Contesting from Two Seats in Elections Date of the Judgment: February 2, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 75 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha J, and J B Pardiwala J. The judgment was authored by Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI. Can a candidate contest from multiple constituencies

Supreme Court Upholds the Validity of Contesting from Two Seats in Elections: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Armed Forces, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Hima Kohli, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pensionary Benefits, Permanent Commission, Service Law

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether women Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) of the Indian Air Force (IAF), who were not part of the original litigation, are entitled to the same benefits as those who were, specifically

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints Committee to Oversee Advocate Verification: Ajay Shankar Srivastava vs. Bar Council of India (2023)

/ Bar Council of India, Bar Council of India Act, 1961, Bar Council of India Act, 1961 with Section 6, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Appoints Committee to Oversee Advocate Verification: Ajay Shankar Srivastava vs. Bar Council of India (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 319 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J, J B Pardiwala, J. Can the legal profession maintain its integrity when unqualified individuals are practicing law?

Supreme Court Appoints Committee to Oversee Advocate Verification: Ajay Shankar Srivastava vs. Bar Council of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Expands Abortion Rights: Unmarried Women Included Under MTP Act (29 September 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 with Section 3, Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 2003

Supreme Court expands abortion access to unmarried women Date of the Judgment: 29 September 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 827 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J, A S Bopanna, J, and J B Pardiwala, J. Can unmarried women be denied the right to terminate a pregnancy? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question,

Supreme Court Expands Abortion Rights: Unmarried Women Included Under MTP Act (29 September 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top