J.B. Pardiwala

Supreme Court Orders Investigation into Adani Group Share Price Volatility: Vishal Tiwari vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Investor Protection, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Regulatory Framework, Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 with Rule 19A, Securities Law

Supreme Court Orders Investigation into Adani Group Share Price Volatility: Vishal Tiwari vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Investigation into allegations of stock manipulation and regulatory failures concerning the Adani Group. CASE TYPE: Securities Law, Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Vishal Tiwari vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 2, 2023 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Orders Investigation into Adani Group Share Price Volatility: Vishal Tiwari vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Charitable Purpose’ under Kerala Building Tax Act in exemption claims: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023)

/ Charitable Purpose, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 with Section 3(1), Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Tax Exemption, Tax Law

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Charitable Purpose’ Under Kerala Building Tax Act: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: What constitutes “charitable purpose” for exemption under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975? CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: M/s Lisie Medical Institutions vs. The State of Kerala & Ors. Judgment Date: February 9, 2023

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ‘Charitable Purpose’ under Kerala Building Tax Act in exemption claims: Lisie Medical Institutions vs. State of Kerala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in money laundering cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 201, Code of Criminal Procedure with Sections 177 to 184, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 with Section 44(1), Special Courts under PMLA, Territorial Jurisdiction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in money laundering cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the territorial jurisdiction of Special Courts in cases of money laundering. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement Judgment Date: 7 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in money laundering cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 201, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 with Section 44, Special Courts, Territorial Jurisdiction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the territorial jurisdiction of Special Courts in money laundering cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement Judgment Date: 7 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 101

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Cases: Rana Ayyub vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Interprets “In Notified Ports” Under CRZ Notification: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011, Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011 with Paragraph 8(II)(vi), CRZ-II Areas, Environment Protection Act, 1986, Environment Protection Act, 1986 with CRZ Notification, 2011, Environmental Law, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court Interprets “In Notified Ports” Under CRZ Notification: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the term “in notified ports” under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2011, concerning the permissibility of storage facilities for non-hazardous cargo. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law. Case Name: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt.

Supreme Court Interprets “In Notified Ports” Under CRZ Notification: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Coastal Regulation Zone Norms: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Coastal Regulation Zone, Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 57, Customs Area, Environment Protection Act, 1986, Environment Protection Act, 1986 with 2011 Notification, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court Upholds Coastal Regulation Zone Norms: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “in” versus “within” concerning storage facilities in Coastal Regulation Zones. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law Case Name: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 1 February 2023 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Upholds Coastal Regulation Zone Norms: K.T.V. Health Food Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Unauthorised Use of Electricity” in Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Thomas Joseph (2022)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 126, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 181, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 50, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies “Unauthorised Use of Electricity” in Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Thomas Joseph (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether consumption of electricity exceeding the connected/contracted load constitutes “unauthorised use of electricity.” CASE TYPE: Electricity Law Case Name: Kerala State Electricity Board & Ors. vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J. & Ors. Judgment Date: 16

Supreme Court Clarifies “Unauthorised Use of Electricity” in Kerala State Electricity Board vs. Thomas Joseph (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case: R. Nagender Yadav vs. State of Telangana (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 156, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 468, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Offences Against Property, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case: R. Nagender Yadav vs. State of Telangana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether criminal proceedings for forgery should continue when a civil suit regarding the validity of the same document is pending. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: R. Nagender Yadav vs. The State of Telangana and Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case: R. Nagender Yadav vs. State of Telangana (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Continuing Unlawful Activity” under Gujarat Control of Terrorism Act: State of Gujarat vs. Sandip Omprakash Gupta (2022) INSC 1437 (15 December 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 20(1), Continuing Unlawful Activity, Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015, Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 with Section 2(1)(c), J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Organised Crime, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Clarifies “Continuing Unlawful Activity” under Gujarat Control of Terrorism Act Date of the Judgment: 15 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1437 Judges: S. Abdul Nazeer, J.B. Pardiwala Can prior offenses be the basis for charges under the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015, even if no new offenses are committed

Supreme Court Clarifies “Continuing Unlawful Activity” under Gujarat Control of Terrorism Act: State of Gujarat vs. Sandip Omprakash Gupta (2022) INSC 1437 (15 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation of Goods for Excise Duty in Related Party Transactions: Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax vs. Merino Panel Product Ltd. (2022) INSC 558 (05 December 2022)

/ Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 37B, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 4(1), Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 with Rule 11, Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 with Rule 9, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation of Goods for Excise Duty in Related Party Transactions Introduction Date of the Judgment: 05 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 558 Judges: Surya Kant, J. and J.B. Pardiwala, J. Can the transaction value of goods sold to independent buyers be used to determine the excise duty on goods sold to related

Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation of Goods for Excise Duty in Related Party Transactions: Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax vs. Merino Panel Product Ltd. (2022) INSC 558 (05 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on Juvenile Status in Kathua Rape Case: State of Jammu & Kashmir vs. Shubam Sangra (2022)

/ Age Determination, Ajay Rastogi, Criminal Law, J.B. Pardiwala, Jammu and Kashmir Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2013, Jammu and Kashmir Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2013 with Section 8, Judges, Juvenile Justice

Supreme Court Determines Juvenile Status in Kathua Rape Case: State of Jammu & Kashmir vs. Shubam Sangra (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of juvenile status in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: The State of Jammu & Kashmir (now U.T. of Jammu & Kashmir) & Ors. vs. Shubam Sangra [Judgment Date]: 16 November

Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on Juvenile Status in Kathua Rape Case: State of Jammu & Kashmir vs. Shubam Sangra (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Accident Victim in Motor Accident Claim

/ J.B. Pardiwala, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 168, Surya Kant

“`html Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Accident Victim LEGAL ISSUE: Determining just compensation in motor accident claims involving permanent disability, particularly paraplegia. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Sidram v. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. Judgment Date: 16 November 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 16 November 2022

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Accident Victim in Motor Accident Claim Read Post »

Scroll to Top