J. K. Maheshwari

Supreme Court permits ex post facto Environmental Clearance for Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facilities: D. Swamy vs. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (22 September 2022)

/ Bio-Medical Waste Treatment, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 with Section 3, Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, Environmental Law, Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance, General Clauses Act, 1897, General Clauses Act, 1897 with Section 21, Indira Banerjee, J. K. Maheshwari, Judges

Supreme Court permits ex post facto Environmental Clearance for Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facilities: D. Swamy vs. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility can operate without prior Environmental Clearance (EC). CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, National Green Tribunal Act. Case Name: D. Swamy vs. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board […]

Supreme Court permits ex post facto Environmental Clearance for Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facilities: D. Swamy vs. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (22 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Waives Six-Month Waiting Period for Divorce by Mutual Consent: Amit Kumar vs. Suman Beniwal (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Divorce by Mutual Consent, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 13B, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 with Section 14, Indira Banerjee, J. K. Maheshwari, Judges

Supreme Court Waives Six-Month Waiting Period for Divorce by Mutual Consent: Amit Kumar vs. Suman Beniwal (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the six-month waiting period for a divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is mandatory or directory. CASE TYPE: Family Law Case Name: Amit Kumar vs. Suman Beniwal [Judgment

Supreme Court Waives Six-Month Waiting Period for Divorce by Mutual Consent: Amit Kumar vs. Suman Beniwal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “entertain” under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration Act in interim relief cases: Arcelor Mittal vs. Essar Bulk (14 September 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 17, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Indira Banerjee, Interim Measures, J. K. Maheshwari, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies “Entertain” in Section 9(3) of Arbitration Act: Arcelor Mittal vs. Essar Bulk (2021) Date of the Judgment: 14 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 628 Judges: Indira Banerjee, J., J. K. Maheshwari, J. Can a court continue to hear an application for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “entertain” under Section 9(3) of the Arbitration Act in interim relief cases: Arcelor Mittal vs. Essar Bulk (14 September 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top