Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Narcotics Smuggling Case: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency (27 April 2022)

/ Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 121-A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 122, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 28, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 29, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 30, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act with Section 17, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act with Section 18, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act with Section 20

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Narcotics Smuggling Case: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with narcotics smuggling, based on the evidence presented. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency and Anr. Judgment Date: 27 April 2022 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Narcotics Smuggling Case: Ramjhan Gani Palani vs. National Investigating Agency (27 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in Assault Case (22 April 2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 27, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 324, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in Assault Case (22 April 2022) Date of the Judgment: 22 April 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 400 Judges: N.V. Ramana, CJI., Krishna Murari, J., Hima Kohli, J. Can a conviction for causing hurt with a firearm be upheld if there are minor

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 324 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in Assault Case (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. (22 April 2022)

/ Bail, Criminal Procedure, Criminal Procedure with Section 161, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly granted bail to the accused in a murder case, overlooking the gravity of the offense and available evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 22 April 2022

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Imran vs. Mohammed Bhava & Anr. (22 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restriction on Karta’s Power to Gift Joint Family Property: K.C. Laxmana vs. K.C. Chandrappa Gowda (2022)

/ Alienation of Property, Hindu Law, Joint Family Property, Judges, Krishna Murari, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 109, Pious Purpose, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Restriction on Karta’s Power to Gift Joint Family Property: K.C. Laxmana vs. K.C. Chandrappa Gowda (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Karta (manager) of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) can gift ancestral property to a non-coparcener out of love and affection. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Rights Case Name: K.C. Laxmana vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Restriction on Karta’s Power to Gift Joint Family Property: K.C. Laxmana vs. K.C. Chandrappa Gowda (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Rape Case Due to Lack of Reasoning: Ms. Y vs. State of Rajasthan (2022)

/ Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Criminal Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Women

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Rape Case Due to Lack of Reasoning: Ms. Y vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can grant bail in a serious offense without providing explicit reasoning. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law (Bail) Case Name: Ms. Y vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. [Judgment Date]: April

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in Rape Case Due to Lack of Reasoning: Ms. Y vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (29 March 2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 29, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 30, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a licensed gun owner is liable under the Arms Act if their firearm is used in a crime without their knowledge or consent. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Tarlochan Singh @ Rana VERSUS State of

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating and Breach of Trust Charges in Investment Dispute: Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. (2022) INSC 171

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Companies Act, Companies Act with Section 68, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Krishna Murari, Offences Relating to Property, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating and Breach of Trust Charges in Investment Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal case for cheating and breach of trust can be initiated when the dispute primarily arises from a breach of contract in a commercial transaction. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. vs. The State of

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating and Breach of Trust Charges in Investment Dispute: Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. (2022) INSC 171 Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIRs in Cheating Case Due to Civil Dispute and Procedural Lapses: Babu Venkatesh & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Anr. (2022) INSC 129 (18 February 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Judges, Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Quashes FIRs in Cheating Case Due to Civil Dispute and Procedural Lapses Date of the Judgment: 18 February 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 129 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can a criminal complaint be filed to harass the other party when a civil suit regarding the same transaction is already pending?

Supreme Court Quashes FIRs in Cheating Case Due to Civil Dispute and Procedural Lapses: Babu Venkatesh & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Anr. (2022) INSC 129 (18 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes FIR against in-laws in dowry harassment case: Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar (2022)

/ Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Krishna Murari, Matrimonial Disputes, Offences Against Marriage, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court quashes FIR against in-laws in dowry harassment case: Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether general and omnibus allegations against in-laws in a dowry harassment case warrant quashing of the FIR. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Matrimonial Disputes. Case Name: Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam & Ors. vs. State of Bihar &

Supreme Court quashes FIR against in-laws in dowry harassment case: Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Daughters in Self-Acquired Property: Arunachala Gounder vs. Ponnusamy (20 January 2022)

/ Hindu Law, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 14, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 15, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 16, Judges, Krishna Murari, Mitakshara Law, S. Abdul Nazeer, Self-Acquired Property, Survivorship

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Daughters in Self-Acquired Property: Arunachala Gounder vs. Ponnusamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Inheritance rights of daughters in the self-acquired property of their father under Hindu Law. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Property Law, Inheritance Law Case Name: Arunachala Gounder (Dead) By Lrs. vs. Ponnusamy and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2022

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Daughters in Self-Acquired Property: Arunachala Gounder vs. Ponnusamy (20 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the status of sub-lessees under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur (2022) INSC 27 (10 January 2022)

/ Government Grants Act, 1895, Government Grants Act, 1895 with Section 2, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 3(9), Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 5

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-lessees Not Independent Tenure Holders LEGAL ISSUE: Whether sub-lessees of government land acquire independent tenure holder status under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. CASE TYPE: Land Ceiling Law Case Name: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 10 January 2022

Supreme Court settles the status of sub-lessees under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur (2022) INSC 27 (10 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-Lessee Not Independent Tenure Holder in Uttar Pradesh (10 January 2022)

/ Government Grants Act, 1895, Government Grants Act, 1895 with Section 2, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Abdul Nazeer, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 3(17), Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 3(9), Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 with Section 5

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-Lessee Not Independent Tenure Holder LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sub-lessee of land under a government grant acquires the status of an independent tenure holder under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. CASE TYPE: Land Ceiling Law Case Name: Hardev Singh vs. Prescribed Authority, Kashipur

Supreme Court Upholds Land Ceiling Act: Sub-Lessee Not Independent Tenure Holder in Uttar Pradesh (10 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top