Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Transfer of Right to Use Goods: State of Tripura vs. Chandan Deb (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether tax can be deducted at source on the transfer of the right to use goods under the Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: The State of […]
Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Transfer of Right to Use Goods Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 284 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a state government mandate tax deductions at source on payments for the transfer of the right to use goods, even if
Supreme Court clarifies recovery of erroneous refunds under Central Excise Act Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 254 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can the tax authorities recover an erroneous refund of excise duty without issuing a separate notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act,
Supreme Court Clarifies Recovery of Erroneous Excise Duty Refunds: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a separate notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is required for the recovery of an erroneously refunded excise duty when the refund order is reviewed under
Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Dues to Sugar Factory Employees: Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babulal Lade & Ors. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 24 March 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can long-pending dues of employees be finally settled? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question
Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2023) Date of the Judgment: 23 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 228 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can an employee withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted by the employer? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed
Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted, particularly when the employer’s rejection was based on a different ground than the validity of the withdrawal itself. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The
Supreme Court Limits Arbitrator’s Power to Award Claims Beyond Final Bill: Union of India vs. Bharat Enterprise (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitrator can award claims not included in the final bill submitted by a contractor, especially when the contract prohibits such claims. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs.
Supreme Court quashes adverse remarks against officers in bribery case: Seemant Kumar Singh vs. Mahesh PS & Ors. (2023) INSC 249 (21 March 2023) Date of the Judgment: 21st March, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 249 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Krishna Murari and Ahsanuddin Amanullah. The judgment was authored by Justice Krishna Murari. Can a High Court
Supreme Court Quashes Adverse Remarks and CBI Probe Order in Karnataka Bail Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether adverse remarks and directions for investigation can be made against individuals not party to bail proceedings. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Seemant Kumar Singh v. Mahesh PS & Ors. Judgment Date: 21 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 21
Supreme Court clarifies drug stocking rules for doctors: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered medical practitioner stocking small quantities of medicines for their patients amounts to “stocking for sale” under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: S. Athilakshmi vs. The State Rep. by the Drugs
Supreme Court clarifies drug stocking rules for doctors: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against doctor for stocking medicines: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered medical practitioner stocking medicines for distribution to her own patients amounts to “stocking for sale” under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: S. Athilakshmi vs. The State Rep. by
