Krishna Murari

Supreme Court quashes criminal complaint against chemical traders for alleged drug violations: Hasmukhlal D. Vora vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) INSC 1084 (16 December 2022)

/ Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 482, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Rule 123, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 18, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 3, Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 with Section 3, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court quashes criminal complaint against chemical traders for alleged drug violations: Hasmukhlal D. Vora vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) INSC 1084 (16 December 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal complaint under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 can be sustained against a trader of a substance that is classified as a food ingredient […]

Supreme Court quashes criminal complaint against chemical traders for alleged drug violations: Hasmukhlal D. Vora vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) INSC 1084 (16 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Harpreet Kaur vs. Mohinder Yadav (2022)

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Loss of Consortium, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Harpreet Kaur vs. Mohinder Yadav (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of compensation for loss of dependency and consortium in motor accident claims. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Harpreet Kaur & Ors. vs. Mohinder Yadav & Ors. Judgment Date: 15 December 2022 Date of the Judgment: 15

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Harpreet Kaur vs. Mohinder Yadav (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Construction Worker: Chandramma vs. NCC Limited (2022)

/ Employees Compensation Act, 1923, Employees Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 2(1)(g), Employees Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 2(1)(l), Employees Compensation Act, 1923 with Section 4, Judges, Krishna Murari, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Construction Worker: Chandramma vs. NCC Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of compensation for permanent partial disablement under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/ Employees Compensation Case Name: Chandramma vs. Manager, Regional Office, NCC Limited and Anr. Judgment Date: 9th December 2022 Date of the Judgment: 9th

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Construction Worker: Chandramma vs. NCC Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Scrap Dealer in Motor Accident Case: Mohd. Sabeer @ Shabir Hussain vs. Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (2022) INSC 1047 (09 December 2022)

/ Compensation, Future Prospects, Judges, Krishna Murari, Motor Accident Law, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Permanent Disability, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Scrap Dealer in Motor Accident Case (2022) INSC 1047 Date of the Judgment: 09 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1047 Judges: Krishna Murari, J. and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a court enhance the compensation awarded to a motor accident victim, especially when the victim has suffered a permanent disability?

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Scrap Dealer in Motor Accident Case: Mohd. Sabeer @ Shabir Hussain vs. Regional Manager, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (2022) INSC 1047 (09 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Daughter’s Claim in Tribal Land Compensation: Kamla Neti vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2022)

/ Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 2(2), Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 30, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Denies Daughter’s Claim in Tribal Land Compensation: Kamla Neti vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a daughter from a Scheduled Tribe is entitled to a share of compensation for land acquired, based on survivorship under the Hindu Succession Act. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition/Civil Law Case Name: Kamla Neti (Dead) through

Supreme Court Denies Daughter’s Claim in Tribal Land Compensation: Kamla Neti vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (2022) Read Post »

Land Valuation Remanded: Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Land Acquisition Case – State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam (24 November 2022)

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Market Value Determination, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case for Fresh Valuation: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value and permissible deductions in land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. vs. Radheshyam & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 November 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Land Valuation Remanded: Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Land Acquisition Case – State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Radheshyam (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability of company directors in cheque dishonor cases: Pawan Kumar Goel vs. State of U.P. (2022) INSC 1005 (17 November 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Cheque Dishonor, Judges, Krishna Murari, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 141

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability of Company Directors in Cheque Dishonor Cases Date of the Judgment: 17 November 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1005 Judges: Krishna Murari, J. and Bela M. Trivedi, J. Can a company director be held liable for a cheque bounce if the company isn’t named in the complaint? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court clarifies liability of company directors in cheque dishonor cases: Pawan Kumar Goel vs. State of U.P. (2022) INSC 1005 (17 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Additional License for Processed Iron Ore Exports: Chowgule & Company Limited vs. Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade (04 November 2022)

/ Applicability of Promissory Estoppel, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Exim Policy 1988-1991, Exim Policy 1990-1993, Export Incentives, Foreign Trade Policy, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Promissory Estoppel

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Additional License for Processed Iron Ore Exports LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an exporter is entitled to an additional license based on the export of processed iron ore when the export occurred during a period where the policy specifically excluded “Minerals and Ores” from eligibility. CASE TYPE: Foreign Trade Policy/Export Incentives Case

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Additional License for Processed Iron Ore Exports: Chowgule & Company Limited vs. Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade (04 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the issue of extension of time under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme in banking cases: State Bank of India vs. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 990 (04 November 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Act, 1872, Contract Act, 1872 with Section 62, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court on OTS Scheme: No Extension as a Right Date of the Judgment: 04 November 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 990 Judges: Justice M.R. Shah and Justice Krishna Murari Can a borrower demand an extension of time to repay a loan under a One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme as a matter of right? The Supreme

Supreme Court settles the issue of extension of time under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme in banking cases: State Bank of India vs. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 990 (04 November 2022) Read Post »

Arbitration Clause Enforced: Supreme Court Resolves Shareholder Dispute in VGP Marine Kingdom Case (2022)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Contractual Obligations, Corporate Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Shareholders Agreement

Supreme Court Orders Arbitration in Shareholder Dispute: VGP Marine Kingdom vs. Kay Ellen Arnold (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can refuse to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if prior arbitration proceedings or related matters are pending before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). CASE TYPE: Arbitration

Arbitration Clause Enforced: Supreme Court Resolves Shareholder Dispute in VGP Marine Kingdom Case (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Matters: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa High Court (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e), Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 10, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 21, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 3, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Civil Judge (Senior Division) designated as a Commercial Court can hear arbitration matters, given the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Commercial Law Case Name: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Matters: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi (2022)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Educational Qualification, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Compassionate Appointment: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the relevant date for assessing educational qualifications in compassionate appointment cases. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi Judgment Date: 19 October 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19 October 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top