Kurian Joseph

Supreme Court Ends 20-Year Matrimonial Dispute: Sachin Dhuri vs. Sneha Dhuri (2018)

Supreme Court Ends 20-Year Matrimonial Dispute: Sachin Dhuri vs. Sneha Dhuri (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Resolution of long-standing matrimonial disputes through mutual consent and settlement. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial/Family Law Case Name: Sachin Dinanath Dhuri vs. Mrs. Sneha Sachin Dhuri Judgment Date: February 22, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 22, 2018 Citation: [Not Available in […]

Supreme Court Ends 20-Year Matrimonial Dispute: Sachin Dhuri vs. Sneha Dhuri (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent, Settles Custody Dispute: Sudarsana Rao Gadde vs. Karuna Gadde (2018)

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent, Settles Custody Dispute: Sudarsana Rao Gadde vs. Karuna Gadde (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Granting divorce by mutual consent and settling child custody disputes. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute. Case Name: Sudarsana Rao Gadde vs. Karuna Gadde. [Judgment Date]: February 20, 2018. Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 20, 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent, Settles Custody Dispute: Sudarsana Rao Gadde vs. Karuna Gadde (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of pension case: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (2018)

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of pension case: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the service of an employee under the Indira Gandhi National Open University can be counted towards pensionary benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Pension) Case Name: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N.

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of pension case: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute: Wasim Anwar vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018)

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute: Wasim Anwar vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Quashing of FIR based on settlement in matrimonial disputes. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Wasim Anwar vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. Judgment Date: 19 February 2018 Date of the Judgment: 19 February 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute: Wasim Anwar vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Consumer” Definition for Self-Employment: Paramount Digital Color Lab vs. Agfa India (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Consumer” Definition for Self-Employment: Paramount Digital Color Lab vs. Agfa India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person who buys goods for self-employment is a “consumer” under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: M/s. Paramount Digital Color Lab & Ors. Etc. vs. M/s. Agfa India Pvt. Ltd. &

Supreme Court Clarifies “Consumer” Definition for Self-Employment: Paramount Digital Color Lab vs. Agfa India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Assault Case: Naresh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2018)

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Assault Case: Naresh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of sentence based on settlement and parity in punishment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Naresh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Judgment Date: 15 February 2018 Date of the Judgment: 15 February 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 123 Judges: Justice

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Assault Case: Naresh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Bihar to Consider Employee Absorption After 23 Years of Service

Supreme Court Directs Bihar to Consider Employee Absorption After 23 Years of Service Date of the Judgment: February 13, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 122 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. What happens to employees when a government body is dissolved? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case concerning the Bihar

Supreme Court Directs Bihar to Consider Employee Absorption After 23 Years of Service Read Post »

Supreme Court directs appointment under Evictee Scheme: Union of India vs. Acquilina Rose M. (2018)

Supreme Court directs appointment under Evictee Scheme: Union of India vs. Acquilina Rose M. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in directing appointment under the Evictee Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Acquilina Rose M. [Judgment Date]: 13 February 2018 Date of the Judgment: 13

Supreme Court directs appointment under Evictee Scheme: Union of India vs. Acquilina Rose M. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court awards compensation in termination case: Baburao Dadu Sankpal vs. Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari (2018)

Supreme Court awards compensation in termination case: Baburao Dadu Sankpal vs. Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a terminated employee is entitled to compensation despite the termination being upheld by the Industrial Court. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Baburao Dadu Sankpal(D) Thr L.Rs. vs. Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari Doodh Utpadak Sangh, Kolhapur & Ors.

Supreme Court awards compensation in termination case: Baburao Dadu Sankpal vs. Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restrains Appointment of Principal in College Dispute: Dr. Vandana Tyagi vs. Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College (9 February 2018)

Supreme Court Restrains Appointment of Principal in College Dispute: Dr. Vandana Tyagi vs. Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College Date of the Judgment: 9 February 2018 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can an interim order restrain a college principal from performing her duties? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a recent appeal,

Supreme Court Restrains Appointment of Principal in College Dispute: Dr. Vandana Tyagi vs. Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College (9 February 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court remands land acquisition case to High Court: Lohit & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018)

Supreme Court remands land acquisition case to High Court: Lohit & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018) Date of the Judgment: February 9, 2018 Citation: [Not Available in the source] Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a case be sent back to the High Court for reconsideration if a similar case has

Supreme Court remands land acquisition case to High Court: Lohit & Anr. vs. State of Haryana (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Additional Payment for Messenger Work: J. Linet vs. Food Corporation of India (2018)

Supreme Court Directs Additional Payment for Messenger Work: J. Linet vs. Food Corporation of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Entitlement to additional payment for work done in a different post in addition to regular duties. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: J. Linet vs. The Assistant Manager (Depot), Food Corporation of India & Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Directs Additional Payment for Messenger Work: J. Linet vs. Food Corporation of India (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top