Kurian Joseph

Supreme Court clarifies rules on termination for criminal history: Union of India vs. Amit Singh (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 15, 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No(s). 18799/2017 (Arising from SLP(C) No.4757/2014) Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and R. Banumathi, J. Can an employer terminate an employee’s service based on a past criminal case, even if it was a minor issue resolved before employment? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question […]

Supreme Court clarifies rules on termination for criminal history: Union of India vs. Amit Singh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs reconsideration of police constable’s cancelled candidature: Vikram Singh vs. Commissioner of Police (2017) INSC 981 (15 November 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 15 November 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 981 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J. Can an employer automatically reject a candidate for a job due to past criminal involvement, even if the candidate was later acquitted? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case involving a candidate

Supreme Court directs reconsideration of police constable’s cancelled candidature: Vikram Singh vs. Commissioner of Police (2017) INSC 981 (15 November 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Decides Compensation for Land Acquisition Based on Fruit-Bearing Tree Income: Ismail Hushen Ghanchi vs. National Highways Authority of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of compensation for land acquired, specifically concerning the valuation of fruit-bearing trees. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Ismail Hushen Ghanchi vs. National Highways Authority of India [Judgment Date]: 14 November 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 November 2017 Citation: (Not Available) Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and R. Banumathi, J. When

Supreme Court Decides Compensation for Land Acquisition Based on Fruit-Bearing Tree Income: Ismail Hushen Ghanchi vs. National Highways Authority of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Allotment of Shops at Appellants’ Risk: Om Prakash Dhabai vs. State of Rajasthan (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 14, 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J. Can a court order the allotment of land despite potential conflicts with a master plan? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the allotment of shop spaces. The Court allowed the

Supreme Court Orders Allotment of Shops at Appellants’ Risk: Om Prakash Dhabai vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State (NCT) of Delhi (2017)

Can a High Court cancel a bail order granted by a Sessions Court? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a violent assault and murder. The court examined whether the Sessions Court had properly considered all relevant factors when granting bail to the accused. This case highlights the importance

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder Case: Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State (NCT) of Delhi (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Compensation Case: State of Punjab vs. Bhagta (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in upholding the compensation awarded by the Reference Court without proper analysis. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Bhagta (D) Through Lrs & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 November 2017 Can a High Court uphold a compensation award without discussing the basis

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Compensation Case: State of Punjab vs. Bhagta (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Encroachment Disqualification under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act: Sagar Pandurang Dhundare vs. Keshav Aaba Patil (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a family member of the original encroacher can be disqualified under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. CASE TYPE: Election Law Case Name: Sagar Pandurang Dhundare vs. Keshav Aaba Patil Judgment Date: 13 November 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 977. The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by a bench of

Supreme Court clarifies Encroachment Disqualification under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act: Sagar Pandurang Dhundare vs. Keshav Aaba Patil (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Amendment of Plaint Case: Shivang Mathur vs. Sohan Lal (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 13, 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi. This was a two-judge bench. Can a High Court summarily dismiss a case without addressing the merits? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in a case concerning the amendment of a plaint. The core

Supreme Court Remands Amendment of Plaint Case: Shivang Mathur vs. Sohan Lal (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Employee Transfer Rules: Vijay Kamble Case (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Inter-district transfer of government employees and its impact on promotion opportunities. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vijay S/O Wamanrao Kamble v. Dnyaneshwar Mahadeo Mali & Ors. Judgment Date: November 7, 2017 Can a government employee’s inter-district transfer affect the promotion chances of others in the new district? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Employee Transfer Rules: Vijay Kamble Case (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Appointments Based on Incorrect Category: Amol vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 7, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi Can an appointment be valid if it was offered under a wrong category? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case concerning appointments to the post of Krishi Sevak in Maharashtra. The court

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Appointments Based on Incorrect Category: Amol vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Ineligible Appointments: Shankar vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appointments offered to candidates were valid despite their ineligibility based on merit. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Shankar vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Judgment Date: 07 November 2017 Date of the Judgment: 07 November 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No(s). 7940/2010 Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Ineligible Appointments: Shankar vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation with compound interest: Madhusudan Kabra vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Madhusudan Kabra & Ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Judgment Date]: November 6, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: November 6, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 973 Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi. How should land compensation

Supreme Court enhances land compensation with compound interest: Madhusudan Kabra vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top