Kurian Joseph

Supreme Court clarifies seniority in IPS: Grade pay not the basis for seniority: Union of India vs. Raj Kumar Jha (2017) INSC 760 (12 September 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 12 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 760 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J. Can an officer’s seniority in the Indian Police Service (IPS) be determined by their grade pay, especially if they were inducted from another service? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent judgment, clarifying […]

Supreme Court clarifies seniority in IPS: Grade pay not the basis for seniority: Union of India vs. Raj Kumar Jha (2017) INSC 760 (12 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to reconsider pension dispute: Allahabad Bank vs. Ishwar Saran (2017) INSC 737

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of Allahabad Bank are entitled to pension under the 1995 Regulations or the 2010 Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Pension Law Case Name: Allahabad Bank & Ors. vs. Ishwar Saran & Ors. Judgment Date: 07 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 07 September 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 737 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J.,

Supreme Court directs High Court to reconsider pension dispute: Allahabad Bank vs. Ishwar Saran (2017) INSC 737 Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Family Partition Dispute: Chhipa Faridmahmmed Suleman vs. Chhipa M. Suleman Khedawala & Ors. (2017)

Date of the Judgment: September 7, 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and R. Banumathi, J. Can a decades-long family property dispute finally reach a peaceful resolution? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this very issue in a case involving two brothers embroiled in a partition dispute since 1987. The

Supreme Court Settles Family Partition Dispute: Chhipa Faridmahmmed Suleman vs. Chhipa M. Suleman Khedawala & Ors. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Anita vs. Arun Yadav (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation in motor accident claims, specifically regarding income assessment of the deceased. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: Anita and Others vs. Arun Yadav and Others. Judgment Date: September 7, 2017. Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 7, 2017. The Supreme Court of India, in a recent judgment, addressed

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Anita vs. Arun Yadav (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidates Despite Rule Changes: State of West Bengal vs. Debasis Das (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates selected under an earlier recruitment process should be appointed despite subsequent changes in the recruitment rules. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Debasis Das & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 01 September 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 01 September 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidates Despite Rule Changes: State of West Bengal vs. Debasis Das (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Section 80 CPC Notice Requirement in Property Dispute: Sant Prasad vs. Kausla Nand Sinha (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is mandatory before instituting a suit against the government. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Sant Prasad vs. Kausla Nand Sinha & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 01, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 01, 2017 Citation: Not available

Supreme Court clarifies Section 80 CPC Notice Requirement in Property Dispute: Sant Prasad vs. Kausla Nand Sinha (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating Case After Settlement: G. Ravi vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

Can a criminal case for cheating be quashed when the parties have settled a dispute arising from a cheque bounce? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case where the parties had reached an amicable settlement. This case involved a dispute initially related to a cheque dishonor, which then led to

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating Case After Settlement: G. Ravi vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Family Court Decision in Child Custody Case

Can the Supreme Court intervene to expedite a child custody case? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question by directing the Family Court to quickly resolve a pending matter. This case involves a dispute over the custody of a child, with the Supreme Court intervening to ensure a speedy resolution. The bench comprised

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Family Court Decision in Child Custody Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Section 37 Considerations: Union of India vs. Niyazuddin Sk & Anr. (28 July 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 685 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi, J. Can a High Court grant bail in a case involving commercial quantities of narcotics without considering the stringent conditions under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985? The Supreme Court addressed this critical

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Section 37 Considerations: Union of India vs. Niyazuddin Sk & Anr. (28 July 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Based on Equivalent Qualification and Timely Certificate Submission: Beena R. vs. Kerala Public Service Commission (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate possessing an equivalent qualification to the prescribed one and producing a computer word processing certificate before the written examination can be disqualified for appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Beena R. vs. Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors. [Judgment Date]: July 28, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 28,

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Based on Equivalent Qualification and Timely Certificate Submission: Beena R. vs. Kerala Public Service Commission (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants time to tenant for vacating premises in rent dispute: Khubi Ram vs. Lalit Mohan (27 July 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant should be granted additional time to vacate premises due to personal circumstances in a rent dispute. CASE TYPE: Civil (Rent Control). Case Name: Khubi Ram vs. Lalit Mohan. Judgment Date: 27 July 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 July 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., R. Banumathi,

Supreme Court grants time to tenant for vacating premises in rent dispute: Khubi Ram vs. Lalit Mohan (27 July 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Bonafide Need, Limits High Court’s Revisional Power in Rent Control Cases (27 July 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: The scope of revisional jurisdiction of the High Court under Rent Control Acts concerning findings of fact by lower courts. CASE TYPE: Rent Control/Eviction Case Name: Gandhe Vijay Kumar vs. Mulji @ Mulchand [Judgment Date]: 27 July 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 July 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J.,

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Bonafide Need, Limits High Court’s Revisional Power in Rent Control Cases (27 July 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top