Kurian Joseph

Supreme Court Upholds Past Service Benefits for DGS&D Employee: Union of India vs. O.T. Anthrayose (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether past service benefits, including seniority, should be granted to an employee from the date of joining the Directorate General of Supplies & Disposals (DGS&D). CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India vs. O.T. Anthrayose Judgment Date: 13 July 2017 Date of the Judgment: 13 July 2017 The Supreme Court of […]

Supreme Court Upholds Past Service Benefits for DGS&D Employee: Union of India vs. O.T. Anthrayose (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Selection of Horticulture Officers in Jammu & Kashmir: Vinod Kumar Khajuria vs. State (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of selection process for government jobs. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Vinod Kumar Khajuria & Anr. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 13 July 2017 Date of the Judgment: 13 July 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and R. Banumathi, J. Can a selection process

Supreme Court Upholds Selection of Horticulture Officers in Jammu & Kashmir: Vinod Kumar Khajuria vs. State (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation for B.A. Naik: Civil Appeal (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: B.A. Naik (Since Deceased) By His Lrs. vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Ukp, Bilagi, Karnataka Etc. Judgment Date: July 11, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8935-36 of 2017 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J.,

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation for B.A. Naik: Civil Appeal (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Family Dispute in Anganwadi Worker Appointment: Kamaljit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Resolution of a family dispute regarding the appointment of an Anganwadi worker. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Kamaljit Kaur vs. The State of Punjab & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 11 July 2017 Date of the Judgment: 11 July 2017 Citation: (Not Available in Source) Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi Can

Supreme Court settles Family Dispute in Anganwadi Worker Appointment: Kamaljit Kaur vs. State of Punjab (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Minority Institutions’ Right to Choose Headmasters: Manager, Corporate Educational Agency vs. James Mathew & Ors. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether minority educational institutions have the absolute right to appoint a headmaster of their choice, even if it means overlooking senior teachers from the same community. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Minority Rights Case Name: The Manager, Corporate Educational Agency vs. James Mathew & Ors. Judgment Date: July 11, 2017 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Minority Institutions’ Right to Choose Headmasters: Manager, Corporate Educational Agency vs. James Mathew & Ors. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Grants Time to File Before Sales Tax Tribunal: M/S Gennex Laboratories Ltd. vs. The Commercial Tax Officer (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the writ petition on the ground that the appellant had not availed the statutory remedy of appeal before the Sales Tax Tribunal. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: M/S Gennex Laboratories Ltd. vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Hyderabad & Anr. Judgment Date: July 10, 2017

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Grants Time to File Before Sales Tax Tribunal: M/S Gennex Laboratories Ltd. vs. The Commercial Tax Officer (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Consultation for Termination: Nagar Nigam vs. Dr. Brijbala Tewari (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether termination of service without mandatory consultation with the Public Service Commission is valid under service rules. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar & Ors. vs. Dr. (Smt.) Brijbala Tewari & Anr. Judgment Date: July 10, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 10, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Consultation for Termination: Nagar Nigam vs. Dr. Brijbala Tewari (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Rent Default and Subletting: Anil Kumar Dhekale vs. Rukhiben (2017)

Can a tenant be evicted for not paying rent and subletting the property? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a landlord seeking to evict his tenants. The core issue revolved around whether the tenants had defaulted on rent payments and illegally sublet the property. This case, Anil Kumar Dadhurao

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Rent Default and Subletting: Anil Kumar Dhekale vs. Rukhiben (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need and its applicability to Legal Heirs in Property Eviction Cases (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the bona fide requirement of a landlord for eviction of a tenant extends to the legal heirs upon the landlord’s death, especially when the family business continues. CASE TYPE: Property Eviction Law. Case Name: Satish Chander Aggarwal (D) By Lrs. vs. Shyam Lal Om Prakash, Arhti and Anr Judgment Date: March 30,

Supreme Court rules on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need and its applicability to Legal Heirs in Property Eviction Cases (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court mandates interest on rent arrears: Bhagirath Agarwal vs. M/S Simplex Concrete & Piles (I) Pvt. Ltd. (23 March 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court has the discretion to deny interest on arrears of rent when permitting payment in installments under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. CASE TYPE: Tenancy Law Case Name: Bhagirath Agarwal vs. M/S Simplex Concrete & Piles (I) Pvt. Ltd. [Judgment Date]: 23 March 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court mandates interest on rent arrears: Bhagirath Agarwal vs. M/S Simplex Concrete & Piles (I) Pvt. Ltd. (23 March 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Uphaar Tragedy Case: Fine Imposed Instead of Additional Jail Time

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sentence of imprisonment can be substituted with a fine, and the extent of punishment for offences under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Sushil Ansal and Another Judgment Date: 9th February 2017 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Uphaar Tragedy Case: Fine Imposed Instead of Additional Jail Time Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation: Om Parkash & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2016)

Can a court enhance land compensation when the Land Acquisition Collector has undervalued the land? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case concerning land acquisition in Haryana. This judgment clarifies the principles for determining fair compensation for land acquired by the government. The Supreme Court bench consisted of Justices Kurian

Supreme Court enhances land compensation: Om Parkash & Ors. vs. State of Haryana (2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top