L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Daily Wagers: Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela (26 July 2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Regularization of Daily Wagers, Service Law, Service Law with Gujarat Agricultural University Judgement, Service Law with Umadevi Judgement

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Daily Wagers: Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether daily wagers are entitled to regularization of their services. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vice Chancellor Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela and Anr. Judgment Date: 26 July 2021 Date of the Judgment: 26 July […]

Supreme Court Upholds Regularization of Daily Wagers: Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela (26 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021)

/ Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR), Civil Appeals, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Supreme Court Judgments, Telecom Law, Telecom Regulatory

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clerical or arithmetical errors in the calculation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues can be rectified despite a previous Supreme Court order prohibiting reassessment. CASE TYPE: Telecom Regulatory/Civil Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Notification on Personal Guarantors under IBC: Lalit Kumar Jain vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 128, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 1(3), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 31, Insolvency Resolution, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Notification on Personal Guarantors under IBC LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a notification extending the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to personal guarantors of corporate debtors. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Lalit Kumar Jain vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 21 May 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 21,

Supreme Court Upholds Notification on Personal Guarantors under IBC: Lalit Kumar Jain vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies calculation of Scheduled Commissioning Date in Solar Power Agreements: Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited vs. E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. (2021) INSC 284 (3 May 2021)

/ Contract Law, Contract Law with Article 21, Electricity Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, L. Nageswara Rao, Power Purchase Agreements, Renewable Energy, Solar Power Projects, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Scheduled Commissioning Date in Solar Power Agreements LEGAL ISSUE: How to calculate the Scheduled Commissioning Date (SCOD) in a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for a solar power project, specifically whether the date of approval of the PPA should be included or excluded in the calculation. CASE TYPE: This case falls under the

Supreme Court clarifies calculation of Scheduled Commissioning Date in Solar Power Agreements: Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited vs. E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. (2021) INSC 284 (3 May 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Electricity Load Reduction Rules: Jharkhand State Electricity Board vs. Ramkrishna Forging Ltd. (30 April 2021)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Supplementary Agreements, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 181, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 50, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court on Electricity Load Reduction: Jharkhand State Electricity Board vs. Ramkrishna Forging Ltd. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether subsequent agreements for enhanced electricity load extend the initial agreement period for the purpose of load reduction requests. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law Case Name: Jharkhand State Electricity Board and Others vs. M/s Ramkrishna Forging Limited

Supreme Court clarifies Electricity Load Reduction Rules: Jharkhand State Electricity Board vs. Ramkrishna Forging Ltd. (30 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles MACP implementation date for Central Government Employees: Union of India vs. R.K. Sharma (28 April 2021)

/ Allowances for Central Govt. Employees, Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS), Central Government Employees, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, MACP Implementation Date, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), Service Law, Service Law with MACP Implementation Date, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies MACP Implementation Date for Central Government Employees: Union of India vs. R.K. Sharma (2021) Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 216 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for central government employees be implemented from 01.01.2006, or should

Supreme Court settles MACP implementation date for Central Government Employees: Union of India vs. R.K. Sharma (28 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies scope of deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act in power generation business: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. (28 April 2021)

/ Deductions, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80-IA, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80AB, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Under Section 80-IA of Income Tax Act: Reliance Energy Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2021) Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 243 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can deductions under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act be limited to ‘business income’,

Supreme Court clarifies scope of deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act in power generation business: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Reliance Energy Ltd. (28 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Recall Applications in RBI Information Disclosure Case: Reserve Bank of India vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry & Anr. (28 April 2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Principles of Natural Justice, Public Interest, Recall Application, Review Petition, Right to Information Act, 2005, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 8, Right to Privacy, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Supreme Court Rules, 2013 with Order XLVII, Transparency, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Dismisses Recall Applications in RBI Information Disclosure Case Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2021 Citation: M.A. No.2342 of 2019 in Transferred Case (Civil) No.91 of 2015 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao J. and Vineet Saran J. Can a judgment of the Supreme Court be recalled if affected parties were not heard? The Supreme

Supreme Court Dismisses Recall Applications in RBI Information Disclosure Case: Reserve Bank of India vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry & Anr. (28 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Delay in Execution of Decrees: Rahul S Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi (2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 47, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat, S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court Addresses Delay in Execution of Decrees: Rahul S Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Addressing the issue of delays and obstructions in the execution of decrees in civil cases. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Rahul S Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi & Ors. Judgment Date: 22 April 2021 Date of the

Supreme Court Addresses Delay in Execution of Decrees: Rahul S Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines for Criminal Trials: In Re: Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials (20 April 2021)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 132, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 148, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 207, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 149, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 150, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 154, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat, S.A. Bobde

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines for Criminal Trials: In Re: Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials (20 April 2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Guidelines for uniform practices in criminal trials CASE TYPE: Criminal Procedure Case Name: In Re: To Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials Judgment Date: 20 April 2021 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Issues Guidelines for Criminal Trials: In Re: Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials (20 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedures for Section 138 NI Act cases to expedite trials (16 April 2021)

/ A. S. Bopanna, B. R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 202, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 219, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 258, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 143, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 145, S. A. Bobde, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedures for Section 138 NI Act Cases to Expedite Trials LEGAL ISSUE: Streamlining procedures for trials under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to ensure expeditious disposal of cases. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: In Re: EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881. Judgment Date: 16

Supreme Court clarifies procedures for Section 138 NI Act cases to expedite trials (16 April 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Sale Agreements: A.R. Madana Gopal vs. Ramnath Publications (2021)

/ Contract Law, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 230-A, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 10-A

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Sale Agreements: A.R. Madana Gopal vs. Ramnath Publications (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in seeking specific performance of a sale agreement after the disposal of a related writ petition is fatal to the case, especially when the agreement stipulated payment at the time of registration of sale deeds.

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Sale Agreements: A.R. Madana Gopal vs. Ramnath Publications (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top