L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Act but Strikes Down Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 246, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Legislative Competence, Legislative Competence with List II Entry 39, Legislative Competence with List II Entry 40, State Legislature Powers

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Act but Strikes Down Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Legislative competence of a state legislature to enact laws regarding parliamentary secretaries and the validity of saving clauses in repealing acts. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law/Legislative Competence Case Name: State of Manipur & Ors. vs. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Repeal of Manipur Act but Strikes Down Saving Clause: State of Manipur vs. Surjakumar Okram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Corrects Cause Title in Service Matter Appeal: Praveen Kumar vs. Kerala PSC (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Civil Procedure, Correction of Judgement, Judges, Kerala Public Service Commission, L. Nageswara Rao, Miscellaneous Application, Service Law

Supreme Court Corrects Cause Title in Service Matter Appeal: Praveen Kumar vs. Kerala PSC (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 28, 2022 Citation: Miscellaneous Application No.1769/2021 in C.A. No.4846/2021 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai. Did you know that even a small error in a court document can

Supreme Court Corrects Cause Title in Service Matter Appeal: Praveen Kumar vs. Kerala PSC (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for SC/ST Promotion Reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 335, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for SC/ST Promotion Reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 28, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 78 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J., B.R. Gavai, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed a series of appeals concerning the contentious issue of reservations in

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for SC/ST Promotion Reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Requirements for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 335, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Requirements for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: What constitutes adequate quantifiable data for providing reservations in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Jarnail Singh & Ors. vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 28 January

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Requirements for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies data collection for reservation in promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Reservation in Promotions, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Law with Cadre

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the method of collecting quantifiable data for reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). CASE TYPE: Service Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Jarnail Singh & Ors. vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta &

Supreme Court clarifies data collection for reservation in promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure with Order 7 Rule 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for partition is maintainable when a prior partition of joint family property has been established. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Partition Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition of Joint Family Property: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(1)(e), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17(2)(v), Registration Act, 1908 with Section 49, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior family partition, even if based on an unregistered arbitration award, bars a subsequent suit for partition of the same properties. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy and

Supreme Court Upholds Prior Partition in Family Property Dispute: K. Arumuga Velaiah vs. P.R. Ramasamy (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36B, Unconscionable Contracts, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1106 of 2009 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a real estate developer be held liable

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Contract Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 912 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. (authored by L. Nageswara Rao, J.) Can a real estate developer be held

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission Order in DLF Housing Dispute: B.B. Patel & Ors. vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Unconscionable Contract, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission Order in DLF Housing Dispute: B.B. Patel & Ors. vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in handing over possession of apartments and the imposition of extra charges by a builder constitutes an unfair trade practice under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission Order in DLF Housing Dispute: B.B. Patel & Ors. vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Trademark Infringement: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. wins against “Sai Renaissance” (19 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 29, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 30, Trademark Infringement

Supreme Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. B. Vijaya Sai (2022) Date of the Judgment: 19 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 70 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. (authored by B.R. Gavai, J.) Can a hotel use a name that is substantially similar to a registered trademark,

Supreme Court settles Trademark Infringement: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. wins against “Sai Renaissance” (19 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trademark Rights: Renaissance Hotel Wins Infringement Case (19 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Infringement of Trademark, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 28, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 29

Supreme Court Upholds Trademark Rights: Renaissance Hotel Wins Infringement Case Date of the Judgment: 19 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 40 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai, and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. Can a company prevent another business from using a similar name, even if the second business adds a prefix? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Trademark Rights: Renaissance Hotel Wins Infringement Case (19 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top