Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Supreme Court modifies damages for tenant in long-standing eviction case: Diwakar Upadhyay vs. P.N. Khanna (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 26, 2008 Judges: R.V. Raveendran and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ. What happens when a tenant refuses to leave a property for decades, despite court orders? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case involving a long-standing dispute between a landlord and a tenant. The core question […]

Supreme Court modifies damages for tenant in long-standing eviction case: Diwakar Upadhyay vs. P.N. Khanna (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside arbitrary rent increase in tenant eviction case: Sunil Kumar vs. Surendra Kumar Agrarwal (26 September 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a High Court arbitrarily increase rent in an interim order during a tenant eviction case? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court sets aside arbitrary rent increase in tenant eviction case: Sunil Kumar vs. Surendra Kumar Agrarwal (26 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC in hurt case: Manoj & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 September 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 25 September 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source Text] Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran, Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can villagers resolve disputes, even those involving physical harm, through mutual agreement? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case where two brothers were convicted of causing hurt with dangerous weapons. The

Supreme Court allows compounding of offence under Section 324 IPC in hurt case: Manoj & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DDA’s Plot Allotment Policy in Land Acquisition Case (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5249 of 2002 Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta When land is acquired for city development, are authorities obligated to provide plots of a specific size to those displaced? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court Upholds DDA’s Plot Allotment Policy in Land Acquisition Case (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes proceedings against brother-in-law in dowry case: Pritam Singh Sidhu vs. State of Punjab (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Judges: R.V. Raveendran J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta J. Can a brother-in-law be held liable for offences related to dowry demands and breach of trust solely based on a vague allegation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case where a brother-in-law was implicated in

Supreme Court quashes proceedings against brother-in-law in dowry case: Pritam Singh Sidhu vs. State of Punjab (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the arbitrability of disputes after a full and final discharge voucher: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Citation: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. [2008] INSC 1437 Judges: R.V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Can a dispute be referred to arbitration after an insured party has issued a full and final discharge voucher to the insurer? The Supreme Court, in

Supreme Court settles the arbitrability of disputes after a full and final discharge voucher: National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Partition Suit: Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Consideration in K. Keshava Bhat vs. Devaki Amma (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice R.V. Raveendran, Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta When family disputes over property reach the courts, ensuring a fair hearing with all evidence considered is crucial. This case involves a decades-long partition suit

Partition Suit: Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Consideration in K. Keshava Bhat vs. Devaki Amma (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies subsistence allowance during suspension when CBI investigates: Punjab National Bank vs. Bernard Lakra (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Judges: Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta When an employee is suspended pending investigation, how much subsistence allowance are they entitled to? The Supreme Court in Punjab National Bank & Anr. vs. Bernard Lakra addressed a dispute regarding the appropriate subsistence allowance for an employee

Supreme Court clarifies subsistence allowance during suspension when CBI investigates: Punjab National Bank vs. Bernard Lakra (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs equitable payment in construction dispute: Rajkamal Builders vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2008 Judges: R.V. Raveendran, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a contractor be left unpaid for an extended period due to disputes between statutory bodies? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case involving Rajkamal Builders and the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), concerning the construction of a bridge

Supreme Court directs equitable payment in construction dispute: Rajkamal Builders vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of oppression and mismanagement case: Vinod Kumar vs. M/S. Singmalon Equipment Pvt. Ltd. (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute between a shareholder and the other shareholders of a company, concerning allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The central question revolves around whether the Company Law Board (CLB) and the High Court of Judicature at Madras properly evaluated the circumstances

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of oppression and mismanagement case: Vinod Kumar vs. M/S. Singmalon Equipment Pvt. Ltd. (2008) Read Post »

Appointment of Principal in Aided Schools: Supreme Court clarifies the role of seniority and recognition in Gwalior Mahila Mandal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of appointing a principal in an aided school, specifically focusing on the roles of seniority and recognition of teachers. The case arose from a dispute over the appointment of a principal at Mahila Mandal Higher Secondary School in Danaoli. The

Appointment of Principal in Aided Schools: Supreme Court clarifies the role of seniority and recognition in Gwalior Mahila Mandal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rules in inter-collectorate transfers: Union of India vs. Deo Narain (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When an employee is transferred from one department to another on compassionate grounds, does that employee lose their previously earned seniority? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Union of India and several

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rules in inter-collectorate transfers: Union of India vs. Deo Narain (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top