Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Supreme Court clarifies scope of mistake under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act in Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. (September 15, 2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Can the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal rectify an order if it fails to consider a decision from the High Court? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax vs. […]

Supreme Court clarifies scope of mistake under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act in Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. (September 15, 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Liquidated Damages in Government Contracts: BSNL vs. Motorola (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5645 of 2008 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 3459 of 2007] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When can a dispute be resolved outside of court-ordered arbitration? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case between Bharat Sanchar

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Liquidated Damages in Government Contracts: BSNL vs. Motorola (2008) Read Post »

Regularization of Daily Wage Workers: Supreme Court clarifies applicability of State Government policies in Haryana Rajya Sainik Board vs. Mohan Lal (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a social welfare organization be compelled to regularize a daily wage employee based on State Government policies? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Haryana Rajya Sainik Board-cum-Defence & Security Relief Fund & Member

Regularization of Daily Wage Workers: Supreme Court clarifies applicability of State Government policies in Haryana Rajya Sainik Board vs. Mohan Lal (2008) Read Post »

Film Shooting Permissions: Supreme Court clarifies conditions for environmental protection in forest areas (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J. and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Can a film production company be compelled to deposit a large sum of money for environmental protection, even after a High Court finds no violation of environmental norms? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Film Shooting Permissions: Supreme Court clarifies conditions for environmental protection in forest areas (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bona Fide Business Needs: Shamshad Ahmad vs. Tilak Raj Bajaj (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a landlord evict a long-term tenant to start a new business for a retired family member? This question was at the heart of a dispute between landlords and tenants in Dehradun. The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bona Fide Business Needs: Shamshad Ahmad vs. Tilak Raj Bajaj (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles promotion criteria for Superintending Engineers: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical question regarding promotions within the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation: Should promotions to the post of Superintending Engineer be based on merit or seniority? This issue arose from a dispute where an Executive Engineer, despite being placed in Category I

Supreme Court settles promotion criteria for Superintending Engineers: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the effect of repeal on Exclusive Marketing Rights under the Patents Act: Glaxo Smith Kline PLC vs. Controller of Patents & Designs (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Citation: N/A (Case reference: Civil Appeal No. 5588 of 2008, arising out of SLP (C) No.21010 of 2006) Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When a law is repealed, what happens to the rights that were in the process of being decided under

Supreme Court settles the effect of repeal on Exclusive Marketing Rights under the Patents Act: Glaxo Smith Kline PLC vs. Controller of Patents & Designs (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court reduces life sentence to 10 years in culpable homicide case: Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil vs. State of Maharashtra (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When does a single blow resulting in death constitute murder versus culpable homicide? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil v. State of Maharashtra. The court examined

Supreme Court reduces life sentence to 10 years in culpable homicide case: Kallu @ Kalyan Atmaram Patil vs. State of Maharashtra (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail in defamation case: Jonathan Nitin Brady vs. State of West Bengal (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Can a radio jockey be arrested for comments made during a show? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Jonathan Nitin Brady vs. State of West Bengal, where an FIR was filed against a radio jockey

Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail in defamation case: Jonathan Nitin Brady vs. State of West Bengal (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court grants bail in forgery case involving forged vehicle registration: Anwar Ali vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: R. V. Raveendran, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a person accused of using forged documents to obtain a vehicle registration certificate be granted bail if a co-accused with similar evidence has already been granted bail? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case involving allegations of forgery

Supreme Court grants bail in forgery case involving forged vehicle registration: Anwar Ali vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles seniority rules for Direct Recruits and Departmental Promotees in AFHQ Civil Services: AFHQ/ISOs SOs (DP) Association & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2008)

Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (civil) 1384 of 2008 Judges: H. K. Sema, Altamas Kabir, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can the government alter seniority rules to favor one group of employees over another? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) within the

Supreme Court settles seniority rules for Direct Recruits and Departmental Promotees in AFHQ Civil Services: AFHQ/ISOs SOs (DP) Association & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Document Examination in Lilavati Hospital Trust Case (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (crl.) 330 of 2008 Judges: Altamas Kabir, J. and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. The Supreme Court addressed the extent to which documents could be examined in a case involving allegations of forgery within the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust. The core issue revolved around whether

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Document Examination in Lilavati Hospital Trust Case (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top