M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreements in Renewable Energy Sector: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Private Limited (2023)

/ Contract Law, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 181, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Power Purchase Agreements, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sanctity of Contracts, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Tariff Determination

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreements in Renewable Energy Sector: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Private Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a change in regulations regarding the pricing of renewable energy certificates (RECs) can retroactively alter the terms of existing Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law […]

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreements in Renewable Energy Sector: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Private Limited (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Equal Pay for Home Guards based on Police Personnel Pay Scale: Prakash Kumar Jena vs. State of Odisha (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Duty Call-up Allowance, Home Guards, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh, Minimum Pay, Service Law

Supreme Court Directs Equal Pay for Home Guards based on Police Personnel Pay Scale: Prakash Kumar Jena vs. State of Odisha (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Entitlement of Home Guards to Duty Call-up Allowance (DCA) equivalent to the minimum pay of police personnel. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Prakash Kumar Jena & Ors. vs. The State

Supreme Court Directs Equal Pay for Home Guards based on Police Personnel Pay Scale: Prakash Kumar Jena vs. State of Odisha (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Equal Pay for Home Guards Based on Police Personnel Pay Scale: Prakash Kumar Jena & Ors. vs. State of Odisha & Ors. (2023) INSC 254

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh, Pay Scales and Allowances, Right to Equality, Service Law, Service Law with Duty Call-up Allowance

Supreme Court Directs Equal Pay for Home Guards Based on Police Personnel Pay Scale Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 254 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., M.M. Sundresh, J. Can Home Guards, who perform duties similar to police personnel, be paid less than the minimum pay scale of police constables? The

Supreme Court Directs Equal Pay for Home Guards Based on Police Personnel Pay Scale: Prakash Kumar Jena & Ors. vs. State of Odisha & Ors. (2023) INSC 254 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Security Deposit and Modifies Interest Rate in Construction Contract Dispute: Indian Railway Construction Company Limited vs. M/s National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited (2023) INSC 248 (17 March 2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 31(7)(a), Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 17.4, Contract Law with Clause 60.1, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Security Deposit and Modifies Interest Rate in Construction Contract Dispute Date of the Judgment: 17 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 248 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a contractor’s security deposit be forfeited if they fail to complete work, even if the termination notice cites an

Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Security Deposit and Modifies Interest Rate in Construction Contract Dispute: Indian Railway Construction Company Limited vs. M/s National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited (2023) INSC 248 (17 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Consumer Protection Rules: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (3 March 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Law, Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Consumer Protection Rules: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of rules regarding qualifications and appointment procedures for members of State and District Consumer Commissions. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Law Case Name: The Secretary Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr.

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Consumer Protection Rules: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye & Ors. (3 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Strikes Down Consumer Protection Rules on Appointment of Members: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye (2023)

/ Appointment of Members, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 217, Constitutional Law with Article 233, Consumer Law, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Strikes Down Consumer Protection Rules on Appointment of Members: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the rules for appointment of members to the State and District Consumer Commissions under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 are arbitrary and violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India. CASE

Supreme Court Strikes Down Consumer Protection Rules on Appointment of Members: Ministry of Consumer Affairs vs. Dr. Mahindra Bhaskar Limaye (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Conviction in Murder and Robbery Case: Jagdish vs. State (2023) INSC 123

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 392, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 397, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Revises Conviction in Murder and Robbery Case: Jagdish vs. State (2023) INSC 123 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was justified in a case of murder and robbery. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Jagdish

Supreme Court Revises Conviction in Murder and Robbery Case: Jagdish vs. State (2023) INSC 123 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder but Alters Robbery Charge: Jagdish vs. State (22 February 2023)

/ Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 392, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 397, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Murder, Robbery, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder but Alters Robbery Charge: Jagdish vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellants were guilty of murder and armed robbery. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Jagdish Etc. vs. The State of Rajasthan Judgment Date: 22 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 1532

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder but Alters Robbery Charge: Jagdish vs. State (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Temporary Land Acquisition: Supreme Court Limits Duration in Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (20 January 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 35, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Property, Temporary Land Acquisition

Supreme Court on Temporary Land Acquisition: Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Can temporary land acquisition continue indefinitely, infringing on property rights? CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Manubhai Sendhabhai Bharwad and Another vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Others Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 January

Temporary Land Acquisition: Supreme Court Limits Duration in Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Rajaram vs. Maruthachalam (2023) INSC 26

/ Acquittal, B.R. Gavai, Civil Law, Civil Suit, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 118(a), Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 139, Promissory Note

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Rajaram vs. Maruthachalam (2023) INSC 26 Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 26 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act be sustained if the accused demonstrates a probable

Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Rajaram vs. Maruthachalam (2023) INSC 26 Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Boby vs. State of Kerala (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Boby vs. State of Kerala (2023) Date of the Judgment: 12th January 2023 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh. This was a unanimous decision by a two-judge bench, with the judgment authored

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence: Boby vs. State of Kerala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in double murder case due to flawed investigation: Ranvir Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 25

/ B.R. Gavai, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 154, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court overturns conviction in double murder case due to flawed investigation: Ranvir Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 25 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the appellants for murder was sustainable given the serious flaws in the investigation and contradictory evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ranvir Singh etc. vs. The State

Supreme Court overturns conviction in double murder case due to flawed investigation: Ranvir Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) INSC 25 Read Post »

Scroll to Top