M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encroachment of Village Lands: Maharashtra Rajya Vadar Samaj Sangh vs. Union of India (24 November 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, Land Law, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Land Revenue (Extraction and Removal of Minor Minerals) Rules, 1968, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals Law, Mines and Minerals Law with Section 15

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encroachment of Village Lands: Maharashtra Rajya Vadar Samaj Sangh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government resolution prohibiting the use of village common lands for private purposes infringes upon the traditional rights of a nomadic tribe to extract stones. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation/Constitutional Law Case Name: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encroachment of Village Lands: Maharashtra Rajya Vadar Samaj Sangh vs. Union of India (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Capital Gains Tax on Asset Revaluation in Partnership Firms: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills (24 November 2022)

/ Capital Gains Tax, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 45(4), Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court on Capital Gains Tax on Revaluation of Assets in Partnership Firms Date of the Judgment: 24 November 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1121 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a partnership firm be taxed for capital gains when its assets are revalued and the increased value is credited to the partners’

Supreme Court clarifies Capital Gains Tax on Asset Revaluation in Partnership Firms: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Allotment for Public Land: Ramani vs. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (24 November 2022)

/ Civil Law, Judges, Land Allotment, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh, Public Interest, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Allotment for Public Land: Ramani vs. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land allotted for public utility can be allotted to an individual and whether the residents of the locality are aggrieved persons if the land is allotted to an individual. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Land

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Allotment for Public Land: Ramani vs. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Department of Land and Building vs. Anjeet Singh (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Award, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Department of Land and Building vs. Anjeet Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if either possession is not taken or compensation is not paid. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: Department of Land and Building vs. Anjeet Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma (24 November 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid,

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employee: Zila Parishad vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware (2022)

/ Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 14, Contractual Employment, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh, Regularization of Service, Service Law, Termination of Employment

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employee: Zila Parishad vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to regularization of service due to long service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Thane & Ors. vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on regularization of contractual employee: Zila Parishad vs. Santosh Tukaram Tiware (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Tax Deduction for Polyurethane Foam Manufacturer: M/s Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2022)

/ Eleventh Schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80-IB, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Denies Tax Deduction for Polyurethane Foam Manufacturer: M/s Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2022) Date of the Judgment: November 17, 2022 Citation: M/s Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax & Another Civil Appeal No. 8260 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J.

Supreme Court Denies Tax Deduction for Polyurethane Foam Manufacturer: M/s Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Interest on Delayed Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Rameshwar (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Limits Interest on Delayed Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Rameshwar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether statutory benefits and interest should be awarded for the period of delay in filing appeals for enhanced land compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Rameshwar @ Ramesh Chandra Sharma (Dead) Through Legal Heir

Supreme Court Limits Interest on Delayed Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Rameshwar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) on Airline Ticket Commissions: Singapore Airlines vs. CIT (2022)

/ Contract of Agency, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 194H, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 201, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 273B, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 182, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies TDS on Airline Ticket Commissions: Singapore Airlines vs. CIT (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether airlines are liable to deduct Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) on the supplementary commission earned by travel agents on the sale of airline tickets. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Singapore Airlines Ltd. vs. C.I.T., Delhi Judgment Date:

Supreme Court clarifies Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) on Airline Ticket Commissions: Singapore Airlines vs. CIT (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Decision on B.Ed. College Recognition: State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College of Education (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 with Rule 7(5), NCTE Regulations, 2014

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Decision on B.Ed. College Recognition: State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College of Education (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State Government can refuse recognition to new B.Ed. colleges based on the grounds of potential unemployment among graduates. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: The State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Decision on B.Ed. College Recognition: State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College of Education (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Counting of Past Service for Career Advancement Scheme: Mahatma Gandhi University vs. Rincymol Mathew (2022)

/ Career Advancement Scheme (CAS), Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Mahatma Gandhi University Act, 1985, Mahatma Gandhi University Act, 1985 with Section 10(17), Service Law, UGC Regulations, UGC Regulations, University Grants Commission

Supreme Court Allows Counting of Past Service for Career Advancement Scheme: Mahatma Gandhi University vs. Rincymol Mathew (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether past service in a temporary position can be counted for Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Mahatma Gandhi University and Ors. vs. Rincymol Mathew [Judgment Date]: 10 November

Supreme Court Allows Counting of Past Service for Career Advancement Scheme: Mahatma Gandhi University vs. Rincymol Mathew (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Vice-Chancellor Appointment for Lack of Experience: Narendra Singh Bhandari vs. Ravindra Jugran (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 319, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Soban Singh Jeena University Act, 2019, Soban Singh Jeena University Act, 2019 with Section 10, University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations, 2018, University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations, 2018 with Regulation 7.3.0

Supreme Court Quashes Vice-Chancellor Appointment for Lack of Experience: Narendra Singh Bhandari vs. Ravindra Jugran (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Vice-Chancellor’s appointment is valid if they do not meet the minimum experience requirements set by the University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations, 2018, and whether the appointment process followed the prescribed procedures. CASE TYPE: Education Law,

Supreme Court Quashes Vice-Chancellor Appointment for Lack of Experience: Narendra Singh Bhandari vs. Ravindra Jugran (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top