M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Housewife’s Death in Motor Accident Case: Shiv Kumar & Ors. vs. Gainda Lal & Ors. (2022) INSC 945 (21 October 2022)

/ Compensation, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Housewife’s Death in Motor Accident Case Date of the Judgment: 21 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 945 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a housewife’s income be assessed fairly when determining compensation in a motor accident claim? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question while hearing […]

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Housewife’s Death in Motor Accident Case: Shiv Kumar & Ors. vs. Gainda Lal & Ors. (2022) INSC 945 (21 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Crematorium to Continue Operations: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association, Vasant Kunj (21 October 2022)

/ Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 with Section 391, Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 with Section 42(f), Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Allows Crematorium to Continue Operations: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association, Vasant Kunj (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a long-standing cremation ground should be closed due to the subsequent establishment of residential areas nearby. CASE TYPE: Civil Law Case Name: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association,

Supreme Court Allows Crematorium to Continue Operations: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association, Vasant Kunj (21 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Hari Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation in Haryana LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Hari Ram (Deceased) Thr. His LRs. and Anr. vs. Land Acquisition Collector cum District Revenue Officer Gurgaon and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 October 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 October

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Hari Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired for public projects. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Jaspal Singh & Others vs. The State of Haryana and Others. Judgment Date: 20 October 2022. Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies taxability of Pan Masala under State Laws: M/S Trimurthi Fragrances (P) Ltd. vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi (2022) INSC 751 (19 September 2022)

/ Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Hemant Gupta, Indira Banerjee, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, State Sales Tax, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Surya Kant, Tax Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Pan Masala under State Laws Date of the Judgment: 19 September 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 751 Judges: Indira Banerjee, J., Surya Kant, J., M.M. Sundresh, J., Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., Hemant Gupta, J. (Concurring) Can states levy sales tax on ‘Pan Masala’ and ‘gutka’ when these products are already subject to

Supreme Court clarifies taxability of Pan Masala under State Laws: M/S Trimurthi Fragrances (P) Ltd. vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi (2022) INSC 751 (19 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Judicial Officer: Uttam Kumar Shaw vs. Partha Sarathi Sen & Ors. (2022)

/ Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Promotion, Retrospective Application of Rules, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Seniority, Service Law, West Bengal Judicial (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2004, West Bengal Judicial (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2004

Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Judicial Officer: Uttam Kumar Shaw vs. Partha Sarathi Sen & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct seniority of a judicial officer promoted to the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Uttam Kumar Shaw vs. Partha Sarathi Sen & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 13, 2022

Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Judicial Officer: Uttam Kumar Shaw vs. Partha Sarathi Sen & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 66, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXI Rule 90, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Execution of Decrees, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, M.M. Sundresh, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an auction sale of property can be set aside due to procedural irregularities after multiple opportunities for objections were missed by the judgment debtor, and whether a bona fide auction purchaser’s rights are

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale After 30-Year Land Acquisition Dispute: Jagan Singh & Co. vs. Ludhiana Improvement Trust (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Convicts All Accused in Murder Case: Sanjay Puran Bagde vs. State of Maharashtra (28 July 2022)

/ Common Intention, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Murder, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Convicts All Accused in Murder Case: Sanjay Puran Bagde vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 718 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can individuals be held equally liable for a murder even if they didn’t directly inflict the fatal blow? The

Supreme Court Convicts All Accused in Murder Case: Sanjay Puran Bagde vs. State of Maharashtra (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Disability Pension for Accident During Leave: Union of India vs. Ex. Naik Ram Singh (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982, Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 with Rule 12, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 with Regulation 173

Supreme Court Denies Disability Pension for Accident During Leave: Union of India vs. Ex. Naik Ram Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a military personnel is entitled to disability pension for an injury sustained during leave, not directly related to military service. CASE TYPE: Armed Forces Tribunal, Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Denies Disability Pension for Accident During Leave: Union of India vs. Ex. Naik Ram Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence: Virendra vs. State of M.P. (2022)

/ Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 27, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 3, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence: Virendra vs. State of M.P. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Virendra vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Judgment Date: 11 July 2022 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to lack of evidence: Virendra vs. State of M.P. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Calculation of Aeronautical Tariffs, Upholds Regulatory Authority’s Decision: Delhi International Airport Ltd. vs. Airport Economic Regulatory Authority of India & Ors. (2022) INSC 618 (11 July 2022)

/ Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 with Section 22A, Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008, Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 with Section 13, Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 with Section 2(a), Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Clarifies Calculation of Aeronautical Tariffs, Upholds Regulatory Authority’s Decision Date of the Judgment: 11 July 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 618 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., M.M. Sundresh, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed a complex dispute regarding the calculation of aeronautical tariffs at major airports. The core issue revolved around how certain

Supreme Court Clarifies Calculation of Aeronautical Tariffs, Upholds Regulatory Authority’s Decision: Delhi International Airport Ltd. vs. Airport Economic Regulatory Authority of India & Ors. (2022) INSC 618 (11 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Education Facilitator Not Liable for Policy Change: HCMI Education vs. Narendra Pal Singh (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 27A, Judges, M.M. Sundresh

Supreme Court Holds Education Facilitator Not Liable for Policy Change: HCMI Education vs. Narendra Pal Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an education facilitator can be held liable for a policy change made by a foreign government that affects students admitted through the facilitator. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Case Name: HCMI Education vs. Narendra Pal Singh

Supreme Court Holds Education Facilitator Not Liable for Policy Change: HCMI Education vs. Narendra Pal Singh (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top