M. R. Shah

Supreme Court sets aside Allahabad High Court order on land allotment rates: NOIDA vs. 24 Oranges Lab LLP (2021)

Supreme Court sets aside Allahabad High Court order on land allotment rates: NOIDA vs. 24 Oranges Lab LLP (2021) Date of the Judgment: September 21, 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: M. R. Shah, J., A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a lease deed executed based on an interim court order be considered final and binding? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court sets aside Allahabad High Court order on land allotment rates: NOIDA vs. 24 Oranges Lab LLP (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Additional Documents in Commercial Suits: Sudhir Kumar vs. Vinay Kumar (2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Additional Documents in Commercial Suits: Sudhir Kumar vs. Vinay Kumar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for filing additional documents in commercial suits. CASE TYPE: Commercial Litigation Case Name: Sudhir Kumar @ S. Baliyan vs. Vinay Kumar G.B. [Judgment Date]: September 15, 2021 Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2021 Citation: 2021

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Additional Documents in Commercial Suits: Sudhir Kumar vs. Vinay Kumar (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies withdrawal of resolution plan under IBC: Ebix vs. Committee of Creditors (2021)

Date of the Judgment: 13 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 609 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and M. R. Shah, J Can a successful resolution applicant withdraw their resolution plan after it has been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) but before final approval by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)? The Supreme

Supreme Court clarifies withdrawal of resolution plan under IBC: Ebix vs. Committee of Creditors (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clerical or arithmetical errors in the calculation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues can be rectified despite a previous Supreme Court order prohibiting reassessment. CASE TYPE: Telecom Regulatory/Civil Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Brutal Murder Case: Kumer Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (20 July 2021)

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Brutal Murder Case: Kumer Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court correctly exercised its discretion in granting bail to the accused in a case involving serious offenses like murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Kumer Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Judgment Date: 20

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Brutal Murder Case: Kumer Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (20 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds 15-Year Sentence in NDPS Act Case: Gurdev Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds 15-Year Sentence in NDPS Act Case: Gurdev Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sentence higher than the minimum prescribed under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) can be imposed based on the quantity of the drug seized, even if the factors

Supreme Court Upholds 15-Year Sentence in NDPS Act Case: Gurdev Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Court Record Forgery Case: Naveen Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021)

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Court Record Forgery Case: Naveen Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with forging court records. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Naveen Singh vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Judgment Date: March 15, 2021 Date of the

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Court Record Forgery Case: Naveen Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the use of Section 319 CrPC for summoning additional accused: Sartaj Singh vs. State of Haryana (2021)

Supreme Court clarifies the use of Section 319 CrPC for summoning additional accused: Sartaj Singh vs. State of Haryana (2021) Date of the Judgment: March 15, 2021 Citation: Sartaj Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr. Etc. (2021) INSC 142 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. and M. R. Shah, J. Can a trial court

Supreme Court clarifies the use of Section 319 CrPC for summoning additional accused: Sartaj Singh vs. State of Haryana (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for individuals in cheque bounce cases (8 March 2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for Individuals Date of the Judgment: 8 March 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 145 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. and M. R. Shah, J. Can a person be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if a cheque issued by

Supreme Court clarifies liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for individuals in cheque bounce cases (8 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds NCLT Jurisdiction in Contractual Disputes Arising from Insolvency: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Amit Gupta & Ors. (2021) INSC 123

Supreme Court Upholds NCLT Jurisdiction in Contractual Disputes Arising from Insolvency: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Amit Gupta & Ors. (2021) INSC 123 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has jurisdiction over contractual disputes arising from insolvency proceedings and the validity of ipso facto clauses in Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). CASE

Supreme Court Upholds NCLT Jurisdiction in Contractual Disputes Arising from Insolvency: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Amit Gupta & Ors. (2021) INSC 123 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1987 Murder Case: Dhirendra Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1987 Murder Case: Dhirendra Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in upholding the conviction of the accused based on the testimonies of the witnesses, despite some contradictions. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: Dhirendra Singh @ Pappu vs. State of Jharkhand [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in 1987 Murder Case: Dhirendra Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Rejects Fraud Claim in Mortgage Dispute: H.S. Goutham vs. Rama Murthy (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Rejects Fraud Claim in Mortgage Dispute: H.S. Goutham vs. Rama Murthy (2021) Date of the Judgment: 12 February 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 77 Judges: Ashok Bhushan J., R. Subhash Reddy J., M. R. Shah J. (authored the judgment) Can a consent decree be challenged years after it was passed, especially

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale, Rejects Fraud Claim in Mortgage Dispute: H.S. Goutham vs. Rama Murthy (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top