M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Directs Madhya Pradesh High Court to Adhere to 10% Quota in Judicial Appointments: Rajendra Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ (2010) 15 SCC 170, All India Judges’ Association, C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Judicial Appointments, M.R. Shah, Quota System, Service Law

Supreme Court Directs Madhya Pradesh High Court to Adhere to 10% Quota in Judicial Appointments: Rajendra Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court of Madhya Pradesh exceeded the 10% quota for appointments through limited departmental competitive examination as directed by the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Judicial Appointments […]

Supreme Court Directs Madhya Pradesh High Court to Adhere to 10% Quota in Judicial Appointments: Rajendra Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 12(2), Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken and notice issued to collect compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. Dayanand & Anr. Judgment Date: March 13, 2023 Date

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of said land, and whether the acquisition proceedings are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of land under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 229 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities could not take possession

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding deemed lapse of land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Land

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 208 (13 March 2023)

/ Burden of Proof, C.T. Ravikumar, Input Tax Credit, Judges, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 70, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Input Tax Credit Claims Under Karnataka VAT Act Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 208 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a purchasing dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) merely by producing invoices and payment records, or is there a higher burden of proof? The

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 208 (13 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 212 (13 March 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Input Tax Credit, Judges, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 with Section 70, M.R. Shah

Karnataka VAT Act: Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 212 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a purchasing dealer claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) merely by producing invoices and payment receipts, or is there a higher burden of

Supreme Court clarifies burden of proof for Input Tax Credit under Karnataka VAT Act: State of Karnataka vs. M/s Ecom Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited (2023) INSC 212 (13 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation hasn’t been paid, even if possession was taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) INSC 216 (13 March 2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation has not been paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name:

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) INSC 216 (13 March 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top