Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Lack Locus Standi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr. vs. M/s. Beads Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 13, 2023 Introduction Date […]
Supreme Court rules subsequent purchasers cannot challenge land acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. M/s. Beads Properties Pvt. Ltd. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 13 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 213 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who buys land after the government has already started the process of
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. B.S. Dhillon (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 226 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have not taken possession
Supreme Court refers the issue of High Court’s territorial jurisdiction to a Larger Bench in Union of India vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the territorial jurisdiction of High Courts to hear writ petitions challenging orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), particularly when the CAT’s Principal
Supreme Court quashes High Court order to legalize encroachment on school land: State of Haryana vs. Satpal (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 03, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 177 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a High Court direct the regularization of unauthorized occupation of land reserved for a school and playground?
Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Encroachers on School Land: State of Haryana vs. Satpal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether unauthorized occupants of land designated for a school can be directed to be evicted. CASE TYPE: Land Law, Public Land Encroachment Case Name: The State of Haryana and Ors. vs. Satpal & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 3,
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Scheme No. 97: Indore Development Authority vs. Burhani Grih Nirman (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Indore Development Authority’s (IDA) Scheme No. 97 had lapsed under Section 54 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, and whether the land acquisition process was valid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Scheme No. 97: Indore Development Authority vs. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit (2023) Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 200 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a development scheme be invalidated if not fully implemented within three years? The Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds “One Site One Shop” Policy in Chandigarh Market Dispute Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 175 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a shop owner in a market claim a right to the auction platform directly in front of their shop? The Supreme Court of
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in acquitting the accused based on a lack of proof of common intention in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Emphasizing Common Intention: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad Bai (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in acquitting the accused based on lack of proof of common intention in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jad
Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh: Supreme Court on Land Acquisition Lapse Date of the Judgment: 24 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1301 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 3854 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 7205 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have
