M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017 with Clause 38(v), C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 43 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a Public Service Commission award pro-rata marks to all candidates when answer keys are found to be wrong? The Supreme Court of India […]

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, C.T. Ravikumar, Clause 38(v), Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order re-evaluation of answer sheets when a Public Service Commission has already awarded pro-rata marks for questions with incorrect answer keys. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Public

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Om Prakash Case (20 January 2023)

/ Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Om Prakash Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not fully tendered. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Secretary, Land &

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Om Prakash Case (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Om Prakash (2023) INSC 71

/ Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Om Prakash (2023) INSC 71 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not fully paid. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Om Prakash (2023) INSC 71 Read Post »

Temporary Land Acquisition: Supreme Court Limits Duration in Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (20 January 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 35, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Property, Temporary Land Acquisition

Supreme Court on Temporary Land Acquisition: Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Can temporary land acquisition continue indefinitely, infringing on property rights? CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Manubhai Sendhabhai Bharwad and Another vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Others Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 January

Temporary Land Acquisition: Supreme Court Limits Duration in Manubhai Bharwad vs. ONGC (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Award, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 360 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1493 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 22629 OF 2021) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Date of the Judgment: January 20, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 64 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who is not the original landowner challenge a land acquisition? This question was

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules Delhi HC on Lapse: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Singh Anand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession is taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2023 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ratiram & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows additional evidence in Arbitration cases: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34(2)(a), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34(2)(b), C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Section 56, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Arbitration Case: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an applicant can be permitted to adduce additional evidence to support their case in an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically concerning public policy grounds. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s Alpine

Supreme Court allows additional evidence in Arbitration cases: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Contract Act, Indian Contract Act with Section 56, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Policy

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can adduce evidence to support a challenge to an arbitral award based on public policy grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s Alpine Housing Development

Supreme Court permits evidence in Section 34 Arbitration Act: Alpine Housing vs. Ashok Dhariwal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction can be upheld based on circumstantial evidence, particularly when the cause of death is not definitively established, and the primary evidence includes the recovery of the body and stolen property at the instance of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: John Anthonisamy vs. State (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top