Supreme Court Allows Benefit of Sabka Vishwas Scheme Despite Moratorium: Shekhar Resorts vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a company facing a moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) can be denied the benefits of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, if it could not make payments within the scheme’s […]
Supreme Court Allows Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Despite IBC Moratorium Date of the Judgment: 5 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 15 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a company be denied the benefits of the “Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019” if it could not make payments due to a
Supreme Court Clarifies Pre-Deposit Requirements under SARFAESI Act LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) regarding pre-deposit requirements for appeals. CASE TYPE: Securitisation and Debt Recovery Case Name: M/s Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries Private Limited & Another vs. Prudent
Supreme Court Clarifies Pre-Deposit Requirements Under SARFAESI Act: Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries vs. Prudent ARC Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) regarding pre-deposit requirements for appeals. CASE TYPE: Securitisation and Debt Recovery Case Name: M/s Sidha
Supreme Court Quashes Atrocities Act Case in Property Dispute: Venkateswaran vs. Bakthavatchalam (2023) Date of the Judgment: January 5, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 14 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can a property dispute between neighbors be escalated to a criminal case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
Supreme Court Quashes Atrocities Act Case in Property Dispute: B. Venkateswaran vs. P. Bakthavatchalam (2023) Date of the Judgment: January 5, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 18 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can a property dispute be twisted into a case of atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes? The Supreme Court of
Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering delays and prior judgments. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority vs. Omvir Singh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2022 Date
Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: NOIDA vs. Omvir Singh (2022) – Land Acquisition Read Post »
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Possession Valid Despite Non-Tender of Compensation LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition can be deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if possession has been taken but compensation has not been tendered. CASE TYPE: Land
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overruling High Court: Govt of NCT of Delhi vs. Ram Prakash Sehrawat (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE:
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not tendered, even if possession has been
Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Gram Panchayat Adhikari Appointments in Uttar Pradesh Date of the Judgment: 12 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1412 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a candidate who participated in a selection process, based on specific rules, later claim appointment based on a different set of rules? The
Supreme Court Clarifies the Stage for Considering Section 300 CrPC in Criminal Trials Date of the Judgment: 12 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1234 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can an accused person be tried again for murder after being acquitted of kidnapping based on the same set of facts? The Supreme Court
