M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case […]

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Delhi Development Authority vs. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors. (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: DDA vs. Krishan Lal Arora (2022) Date of the Judgment: 02 November 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 7960 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed solely because compensation wasn’t paid

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013: Delhi Development Authority vs. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules Commission Vendors entitled to 50% past service for pension: Union of India vs. Munshi Ram (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Indian Railway Establishment Manual, Vol. II, 1991, Indian Railway Establishment Manual, Vol. II, 1991 with Rule 2005, Judges, M.R. Shah, Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993, Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 with Rule 14, Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 with Rule 31

Supreme Court rules Commission Vendors entitled to 50% past service for pension: Union of India vs. Munshi Ram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Commission Vendors absorbed into regular railway service are entitled to have 50% of their past service counted towards pension benefits, similar to casual laborers. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Pensionary Benefits) Case Name: Union

Supreme Court rules Commission Vendors entitled to 50% past service for pension: Union of India vs. Munshi Ram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Illegal PG Dental Admissions: Dental Council of India vs. Sailendra Sharma (2022)

/ Dentists Act, 1948, Dentists Act, 1948 with Chhattisgarh Dental Medicine Postgraduate Admission Rules, 2017, Dentists Act, 1948 with MDS Course Regulations, 2017, Education Law, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Medical Education Regulations, Postgraduate Admissions

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Illegal PG Dental Admissions: Dental Council of India vs. Sailendra Sharma (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether private dental colleges can unilaterally grant admissions to postgraduate courses after the stipulated deadline and without following the prescribed counselling process. CASE TYPE: Education Law Case Name: Dental Council of India vs. Sailendra Sharma and

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Illegal PG Dental Admissions: Dental Council of India vs. Sailendra Sharma (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Housewife’s Death in Motor Accident Case: Shiv Kumar & Ors. vs. Gainda Lal & Ors. (2022) INSC 945 (21 October 2022)

/ Compensation, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Housewife’s Death in Motor Accident Case Date of the Judgment: 21 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 945 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a housewife’s income be assessed fairly when determining compensation in a motor accident claim? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question while hearing

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Housewife’s Death in Motor Accident Case: Shiv Kumar & Ors. vs. Gainda Lal & Ors. (2022) INSC 945 (21 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Crematorium to Continue Operations: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association, Vasant Kunj (21 October 2022)

/ Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 with Section 391, Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 with Section 42(f), Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Allows Crematorium to Continue Operations: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association, Vasant Kunj (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a long-standing cremation ground should be closed due to the subsequent establishment of residential areas nearby. CASE TYPE: Civil Law Case Name: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association,

Supreme Court Allows Crematorium to Continue Operations: South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Federation of Residents Welfare Association, Vasant Kunj (21 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Vice Chancellor Appointment for Violating UGC Norms in Kerala University: Sreejith P.S. vs. Rajasree M.S. (21 October 2022)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 254, Judges, M.R. Shah, Repugnancy of Laws, University Grants Commission Act, 1956, University Grants Commission Act, 1956 with Section 26, University Grants Commission Regulations

Supreme Court Quashes Vice Chancellor Appointment for Violating UGC Norms Date of the Judgment: 21 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 923 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a University appoint a Vice-Chancellor without adhering to the University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court Quashes Vice Chancellor Appointment for Violating UGC Norms in Kerala University: Sreejith P.S. vs. Rajasree M.S. (21 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Hari Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation in Haryana LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Hari Ram (Deceased) Thr. His LRs. and Anr. vs. Land Acquisition Collector cum District Revenue Officer Gurgaon and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 October 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 20 October

Supreme Court Enhances Land Acquisition Compensation: Hari Ram vs. Land Acquisition Collector (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired for public projects. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Jaspal Singh & Others vs. The State of Haryana and Others. Judgment Date: 20 October 2022. Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court enhances land compensation for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant: Jaspal Singh vs. State of Haryana (20 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Matters: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa High Court (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(1)(e), Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 10, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 21, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 3, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Civil Judge (Senior Division) designated as a Commercial Court can hear arbitration matters, given the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Commercial Law Case Name: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction of Commercial Courts in Arbitration Matters: Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Registrar (General), Orissa High Court (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi (2022)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Educational Qualification, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Compassionate Appointment: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the relevant date for assessing educational qualifications in compassionate appointment cases. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi Judgment Date: 19 October 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19 October 2022 Citation:

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for compassionate appointment: Delhi Jal Board vs. Nirmala Devi (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Sunil Jain Case: Arbitration Dispute (19 October 2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 15, Arbitration Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Sunil Jain Case: Arbitration Dispute (19 October 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Appointment of a new arbitrator due to the death of the previously appointed arbitrator. CASE TYPE: Arbitration. Case Name: Sunil Jain (D) Thr. LRs. and Anr. vs. Chandra Kala & Anr. Judgment Date: 19 October 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Sunil Jain Case: Arbitration Dispute (19 October 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top