M.R. Shah

Supreme Court settles Compensation Apportionment under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436

/ Appeals, Civil Procedure, Compensation Apportionment, Impleadment of Parties, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30, M.R. Shah, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Settles Compensation Apportionment Under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436 LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute regarding the apportionment of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. and Others Judgment Date: […]

Supreme Court settles Compensation Apportionment under Land Acquisition Act: Patel Kodarbhai Mohanbhai vs. Sonata Ceramica Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 436 Read Post »

Supreme Court directs fresh inquiry in Panchayat Assistant Misappropriation Case (2022) INSC 768

/ Departmental Inquiry, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Misappropriation of Funds, Principles of Natural Justice, Service Law, Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act

Supreme Court directs fresh inquiry in Panchayat Assistant Misappropriation Case (2022) INSC 768 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can order reinstatement with back wages when a disciplinary inquiry is found to be in violation of natural justice, or should the matter be remanded for a fresh inquiry. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Departmental Inquiry

Supreme Court directs fresh inquiry in Panchayat Assistant Misappropriation Case (2022) INSC 768 Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Transfer of Central Sales Tax in Inter-State Sale: Tata Motors vs. Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (21 September 2022)

/ Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 with Section 22(1B), Inter-State Sales, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Tax Transfer

Supreme Court Directs Transfer of Central Sales Tax in Inter-State Sale: Tata Motors vs. Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State can retain Central Sales Tax (CST) when it is not the appropriate State to levy the tax on an inter-state sale. CASE TYPE: Tax Law – Central Sales Tax Case

Supreme Court Directs Transfer of Central Sales Tax in Inter-State Sale: Tata Motors vs. Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (21 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Tax Law

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can entertain a writ petition against an assessment order when a statutory remedy of appeal is available. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra and Others vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim: Sumathy vs. Babu (2022)

/ Judges, Just Compensation, Krishna Murari, Loss of Dependency, M.R. Shah, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim: Sumathy vs. Babu (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of just compensation in motor accident claims, specifically considering future prospects and rise in income. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Claim Case Name: Sumathy and Others vs. Babu and Another [Judgment Date]: 19 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 19 September

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim: Sumathy vs. Babu (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case: Raju @ Rajendra Prasad vs. State of Rajasthan (2022)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case: Raju @ Rajendra Prasad vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the accused based on circumstantial evidence was justified. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Raju @ Rajendra Prasad vs. State of Rajasthan [Judgment Date]: 19 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 19 September 2022

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case: Raju @ Rajendra Prasad vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reinstates Compensation for Injured Employee in Construction Accident Case: Suresh Paswan vs. M/s. Kla Construction Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 782 (16 September 2022)

/ Assessment of Disability, Compensation for Workplace Injuries, Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, Employer's Responsibility, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Reinstates Compensation for Injured Employee in Construction Accident Case Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 782 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can an employer avoid compensating an employee for a workplace injury by disputing a disability certificate years after the accident? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Reinstates Compensation for Injured Employee in Construction Accident Case: Suresh Paswan vs. M/s. Kla Construction Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 782 (16 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Modvat Credit on ‘Guide Car’ as Component of Coke Oven Battery: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs (2022) INSC 739 (16 September 2022)

/ Central Excise Rules, 1944, Central Excise Rules, 1944 with Rule 57Q, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with Chapter 84, Classification of Goods, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Denies Modvat Credit on ‘Guide Car’ as Component of Coke Oven Battery Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 739 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Krishna Murari, J. Can a specialized vehicle used in a steel plant be considered a ‘component’ of a larger industrial unit, thus qualifying for tax

Supreme Court Denies Modvat Credit on ‘Guide Car’ as Component of Coke Oven Battery: Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs (2022) INSC 739 (16 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Merchant Navy Amputee in Motor Accident Case: Ramesh vs. Karan Singh (2022) INSC 779 (16 September 2022)

/ Compensation, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Motor Accident Law, Motor Accident Law with Assessment of Compensation, Motor Accident Law with Future Economic Loss

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Merchant Navy Amputee in Motor Accident Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation in motor accident claims involving permanent disability and loss of future earnings. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Ramesh vs. Karan Singh & Anr. Judgment Date: 16 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2022

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Merchant Navy Amputee in Motor Accident Case: Ramesh vs. Karan Singh (2022) INSC 779 (16 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies stamp duty on agreements to sell without transfer of possession in Punjab: Vijay Kumar Goyal vs. Neena Rani (2022)

/ Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Entry No. 5, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 with Entry No. 5(cc), Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Schedule 1-A, Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Agreements to Sell Without Transfer of Possession in Punjab: Vijay Kumar Goyal vs. Neena Rani (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of applicable stamp duty on agreements to sell where possession is not transferred. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Stamp Duty Case Name: Vijay Kumar Goyal (Dead) Thr. LR. vs. Neena

Supreme Court clarifies stamp duty on agreements to sell without transfer of possession in Punjab: Vijay Kumar Goyal vs. Neena Rani (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Murder Case: Joseph Johnson N. Maithkuri vs. Subrahmanya & Anr. (2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 27(3), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120(B), Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Murder Case: Joseph Johnson N. Maithkuri vs. Subrahmanya & Anr. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in granting bail to the accused in a murder case, despite the presence of eyewitnesses and identification in a Test Identification Parade. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Joseph Johnson

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Murder Case: Joseph Johnson N. Maithkuri vs. Subrahmanya & Anr. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Haryana: Amanullah Khan vs. State of Haryana (2022)

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 28A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Enhances Land Compensation in Haryana Acquisition Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Amanullah Khan vs. The State of Haryana and Another Judgment Date: 8 September 2022 Date of the Judgment: 8 September 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 747

Supreme Court enhances compensation for land acquisition in Haryana: Amanullah Khan vs. State of Haryana (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top