M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement for Bank Manager in Loan Misconduct Case: Boloram Bordoloi vs. Lakhimi Gaolia Bank & Ors. (2021) INSC 54

/ Ashok Bhushan, Banking Law, Compulsory Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Lakhimi Gaolia Bank, Loan Disbursement, M.R. Shah, Misconduct in Banking, Proportionality of Punishment, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement for Bank Manager in Loan Misconduct Case Date of the Judgment: February 08, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 54 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a bank employee be compulsorily retired for misconduct related to loan disbursement? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question […]

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement for Bank Manager in Loan Misconduct Case: Boloram Bordoloi vs. Lakhimi Gaolia Bank & Ors. (2021) INSC 54 Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Interest on Deferred Salaries and Pensions in Andhra Pradesh: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Dinavahi Lakshmi Kameswari (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, D.Y. Chandrachud, Deferment of Payments, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pensions, Salaries, Service Law

Supreme Court Reduces Interest on Deferred Salaries and Pensions in Andhra Pradesh: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Dinavahi Lakshmi Kameswari (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of State Government’s order to defer salaries and pensions due to financial crisis and the imposition of interest on the deferred amounts. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Public Interest Litigation Case Name:

Supreme Court Reduces Interest on Deferred Salaries and Pensions in Andhra Pradesh: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Dinavahi Lakshmi Kameswari (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Recall Application in Transferred Criminal Case: Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs. Manmohan Attavar (2021)

/ Civil Procedure, Criminal Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Miscellaneous Application, Recall Application, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Dismisses Recall Application in Transferred Criminal Case: Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs. Manmohan Attavar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Maintainability of a second recall application for the same relief. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs. Manmohan Attavar (D) through LRs. Judgment Date: 05 February 2021 Date of the Judgment: 05 February 2021 Citation:

Supreme Court Dismisses Recall Application in Transferred Criminal Case: Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs. Manmohan Attavar (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Panchayat Land Regularization for Encroachments Exceeding 200 Square Yards

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Encroachment, Judges, Land Law, M.R. Shah, Panchayat Land, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 with Rule 12(4), Regularization

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Panchayat Land Regularization for Encroachments Exceeding 200 Square Yards LEGAL ISSUE: Whether unauthorized occupation of Panchayat land exceeding 200 square yards can be regularized under Rule 12(4) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964. CASE TYPE: Land Law, Panchayat Land Regularization. Case Name: Joginder and another vs. State

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Panchayat Land Regularization for Encroachments Exceeding 200 Square Yards Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies definition of financial creditor under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Phoenix ARC vs. Ketulbhai Patel (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 126, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 172, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 5(7), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 5(8), Judges, M.R. Shah, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Clarifies Financial Creditor Status in Pledge Agreements: Phoenix ARC vs. Ketulbhai Patel (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party holding a pledge of shares as security qualifies as a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. vs. Ketulbhai Ramubhai Patel [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court clarifies definition of financial creditor under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Phoenix ARC vs. Ketulbhai Patel (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bribery case: N. Vijayakumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 362, Judges, M.R. Shah, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bribery case: N. Vijayakumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in reversing the acquittal order of the Trial Court in a case of alleged bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CASE TYPE: Criminal – Prevention of Corruption Act Case Name:

Supreme Court overturns conviction in bribery case: N. Vijayakumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles seniority dispute in King George Medical University: Pooran Chand vs. Chancellor & Ors. (2021) INSC 26

/ Appointment, Ashok Bhushan, Judges, King George Medical University Act, 2002, King George Medical University Act, 2002 with Section 53, M.R. Shah, R. Subhash Reddy, Seniority, Service Law, Statutes of the University, Time Limit

Supreme Court settles seniority dispute in King George Medical University: Pooran Chand vs. Chancellor & Ors. (2021) INSC 26 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a challenge to the appointment of a faculty member in a university can be entertained after a significant delay, and whether the experience of a Senior Research Fellow with the WHO can be

Supreme Court settles seniority dispute in King George Medical University: Pooran Chand vs. Chancellor & Ors. (2021) INSC 26 Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Summoning Accused Under Section 319 CrPC: Ajay Kumar vs State of Uttarakhand (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 319, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 446, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Against Public Tranquillity, R. Subhash Reddy, Revisional Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Summoning Accused Under Section 319 CrPC: Ajay Kumar vs State of Uttarakhand (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can dismiss a criminal revision against a summoning order under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) based on subsequent proceedings related to the same order.

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Summoning Accused Under Section 319 CrPC: Ajay Kumar vs State of Uttarakhand (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Retirement Rights: Indian Bank vs. Mahaveer Khariwal (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Indian Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Law, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law, Service Law with Regulation 29, Voluntary Retirement

Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Retirement Rights: Indian Bank vs. Mahaveer Khariwal (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s application for voluntary retirement can be rejected if the employer fails to consider the request for waiver of the three-month notice period and whether the employee was on deputation or transfer. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Pension Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Retirement Rights: Indian Bank vs. Mahaveer Khariwal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Free Education and Housing for Rape Victim: Ms. X vs. State of Jharkhand (20 January 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 357A, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 228A, Judges, M.R. Shah, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Directs Free Education and Housing for Rape Victim: Ms. X vs. State of Jharkhand (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Rehabilitation and protection of a rape victim. CASE TYPE: Writ Petition (Civil) under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Case Name: Ms. X vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2021

Supreme Court Directs Free Education and Housing for Rape Victim: Ms. X vs. State of Jharkhand (20 January 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Corruption Case: S. Sundara Kumar vs. State (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Judges, M.R. Shah, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, R. Subhash Reddy, Sentencing

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Corruption Case: S. Sundara Kumar vs. State (2021) Date of the Judgment: January 13, 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 14 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a court reduce a sentence for corruption if the accused has already served a significant portion of it and

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Corruption Case: S. Sundara Kumar vs. State (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Reopening of Anganwadi Centers for Child and Maternal Nutrition: Dipika Jagatram Sahani vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 47, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M.R. Shah, National Food Security Act, 2013, National Food Security Act, 2013 with Section 4, National Food Security Act, 2013 with Section 5, National Food Security Act, 2013 with Section 6, Public Interest Litigation, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Directs Reopening of Anganwadi Centers for Child and Maternal Nutrition: Dipika Jagatram Sahani vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Anganwadi Centers should be reopened to provide essential nutritional services to women and children during the COVID-19 pandemic. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (Constitutional Law) Case Name: Dipika Jagatram Sahani vs. Union

Supreme Court Directs Reopening of Anganwadi Centers for Child and Maternal Nutrition: Dipika Jagatram Sahani vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top