M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Govt. of […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Deemed Lapse of Acquisition, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Govt. of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court orders re-evaluation of answer keys in Sub Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Service Law, Service Law with Writ Petitions

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation in Jharkhand Sub-Inspector Exam Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petitions of candidates who raised objections to the answer keys after the stipulated time but before the declaration of results, and whether the High Court was correct in holding that no prejudice was caused

Supreme Court orders re-evaluation of answer keys in Sub Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Sub-Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Examination Rules, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Judges, M.R. Shah, Recruitment Examination, Service Law

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Sub-Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the appeals of candidates who raised objections to the answer key of a competitive exam after the stipulated deadline but before the declaration of results. CASE TYPE: Service Law –

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Sub-Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Lien Termination in Government Service: State of Rajasthan vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 with Rule 18(2), Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Lien Termination in Government Service: State of Rajasthan vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government employee’s lien on their previous post is terminated upon permanent absorption into another organization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (Dead) by LRs

Supreme Court Clarifies Lien Termination in Government Service: State of Rajasthan vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Rights of Employees Absorbed into Rajasthan Dairy Federations (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Lien, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 with Rule 18, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Rights of Employees Absorbed into Rajasthan Dairy Federations (28 April 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who initially worked for the Rajasthan State Government but were later absorbed into the Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federations are entitled to pensionary benefits from the State Government. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Rajasthan

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Rights of Employees Absorbed into Rajasthan Dairy Federations (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, M.R. Shah, Pay Revision, Service Law

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana: Supreme Court on Pay Revision Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2702 of 2023 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can employees who joined after a pay revision date be automatically entitled to the revised pay scale? The Supreme

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pay Revision, Performance Targets, Service Law, Service Law with D.O./order

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana: Supreme Court on Pay Revision Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2023Citation: 2023 INSC 456Judges: Justice M.R. Shah and Justice C.T. Ravikumar Can employees who joined after a pay revision date be entitled to the benefits of that revision? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Plaint in Property Dispute Due to Limitation: Ramisetty Venkatanna vs. Nasyam Jamal Saheb (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule XI, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Rejects Plaint in Property Dispute Due to Limitation: Ramisetty Venkatanna vs. Nasyam Jamal Saheb (28 April 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit can be maintained when it indirectly challenges a partition deed that is time-barred under the law of limitation. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Ramisetty Venkatanna & Anr. vs. Nasyam

Supreme Court Rejects Plaint in Property Dispute Due to Limitation: Ramisetty Venkatanna vs. Nasyam Jamal Saheb (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit for Clever Drafting: Ramisetty Venkatanna vs Nasyam Jamal Saheb (2023) INSC 458

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule XI, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rejection of Plaint

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit for Clever Drafting: Ramisetty Venkatanna vs Nasyam Jamal Saheb (2023) INSC 458 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit can be dismissed for being barred by limitation and for having an illusory cause of action when the plaintiff cleverly drafts the plaint to avoid mentioning the circumstances that would make the suit time-barred.

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit for Clever Drafting: Ramisetty Venkatanna vs Nasyam Jamal Saheb (2023) INSC 458 Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating and Forgery Charges Against Shiromani Akali Dal Leaders: Sukhbir Singh Badal vs. Balwant Singh Khera (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 415, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 463, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Relating to Documents, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 29-A

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating and Forgery Charges Against Shiromani Akali Dal Leaders: Sukhbir Singh Badal vs. Balwant Singh Khera (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the leaders of Shiromani Akali Dal (Badal) committed cheating and forgery by submitting a false declaration of secularism to the Election Commission of India while registering the party. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case

Supreme Court Quashes Cheating and Forgery Charges Against Shiromani Akali Dal Leaders: Sukhbir Singh Badal vs. Balwant Singh Khera (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes forgery and cheating charges against Shiromani Akali Dal leaders: Sukhbir Singh Badal vs. Balwant Singh Khera (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 202, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 315, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 465, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences Relating to Documents and Property Marks, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 29-A

Supreme Court quashes forgery and cheating charges against Shiromani Akali Dal leaders: Sukhbir Singh Badal vs. Balwant Singh Khera (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the leaders of Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) committed forgery and cheating by submitting a false declaration of secularism to the Election Commission of India (ECI). CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Shri

Supreme Court quashes forgery and cheating charges against Shiromani Akali Dal leaders: Sukhbir Singh Badal vs. Balwant Singh Khera (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top