Supreme Court commutes death penalty in POCSO case: Vijay Raikwar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty imposed on the accused for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was justified in the facts and circumstances of the case. CASE TYPE: […]
Supreme Court clarifies “experience as” Company Secretary for job eligibility: Ritu Bhatia vs. Ministry of Civil Supplies (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “experience as” in job eligibility criteria. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ritu Bhatia vs. Ministry of Civil Supplies Consumer Affairs & Public Distribution and Others Judgment Date: 05 February 2019 Date of
Supreme Court Upholds Haj Policy: Federation Haj PTOs vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Examining the validity of the Government’s Haj Policy concerning the eligibility criteria for Private Tour Operators (PTOs). CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Regulatory Policy. Case Name: Federation Haj PTOs of India vs. Union of India [Judgment Date]: 04 February 2019
Supreme Court Upholds Haj Policy: Federation Haj PTOs vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »
Supreme Court recalls order of property sale in execution of decree: Yatinder Kumar Aggarwal & Ors. vs. Mukund Swarup & Ors. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a property sale in execution of a decree should be set aside if the judgment debtor demonstrates that the decree amount has been satisfied. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Yatinder
Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case: Anss Rajashekar vs. Augustus Jeba Ananth (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, that a cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt, was rebutted by the accused. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal (Cheque Bounce) Case Name: Anss Rajashekar vs.
Supreme Court overturns conviction for abetment of suicide in dowry harassment case: Rajesh vs. State of Haryana (2019) INSC 18 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether slapping a person and making false allegations of dowry demand, which occurred five months before the suicide, constitutes abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE:
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Attempt to Murder Charge: Champa Lal Dhakar vs. Naval Singh Rajput (2019) INSC 1 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in setting aside the trial court’s order framing charges under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for attempt to murder, based on the nature
Supreme Court Upholds Tax on Vehicle Possession for Manufacturers and Dealers: Tata Motors vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether manufacturers and dealers of motor vehicles are liable to pay tax on vehicles in their possession before sale to the ultimate consumer. CASE TYPE: Motor Vehicles Taxation Law Case Name: M/S. Tata Motors Limited
Supreme Court clarifies property disposal under Section 452 CrPC: BSNL vs. Suryanarayanan (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the disposal of seized property after the conclusion of a criminal trial under Section 452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. Suryanarayanan & Anr. Judgment Date:
Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Axe Attack Case: State of Rajasthan vs. Leela Ram (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the act of inflicting a single blow with an axe on the skull constitutes murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of Rajasthan vs. Leela Ram @ Leela
Supreme Court Rules on Compassionate Appointment for Children of Second Marriages LEGAL ISSUE: Whether children born from a second marriage are eligible for compassionate appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India & Anr. vs. V.R. Tripathi. [Judgment Date]: 11 December 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 11 December 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC
Supreme Court Upholds Right to Legal Assistance in Summary Court Martial: Jaswant Singh vs. Union of India (2018) Date of the Judgment: 10 December 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 1088 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a soldier be denied legal representation during a Summary Court Martial? The Supreme Court of India
