Supreme Court overturns High Court order on contract employee reinstatement: APSRTC vs. M. Maruthi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contract employee, dismissed after a departmental inquiry, is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service based on a previous judgment concerning employees terminated without inquiry. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Depot Manager, APSRTC vs. […]
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees: APSRTC vs. B. Venkataiah (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of their initial termination until their re-engagement for the purpose of regularization, even if the termination was not challenged. CASE
Supreme Court Denies Continuity of Service to Re-engaged Contract Employee: APSRTC vs. K. Sathaiah (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of termination until re-engagement for the purpose of regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: APSRTC & Ors. vs. Sri K. Sathaiah Judgment Date:
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on reinstatement of employee after departmental enquiry: APSRTC vs. G. Kondal Rao (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can be reinstated with continuity of service after being terminated following a departmental enquiry that found them guilty of misconduct. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: APSRTC & Ors. vs. G.
Supreme Court on Continuity of Service for Re-engaged Contract Employees: APSRTC vs. A. Sanjeev Reddy (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of termination until the date of re-engagement for regularization purposes. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: APSRTC & Ors. vs. Sri A. Sanjeev
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for contract employees dismissed after inquiry: Depot Manager vs. S. Krishna (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contract employee, dismissed after a departmental inquiry, is entitled to continuity of service upon re-engagement. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Depot Manager & Ors. vs. Sri S.
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for contract employees after misconduct: The Depot Manager vs. Sri R.K. Reddy (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contract employee, terminated for misconduct after a departmental inquiry, is entitled to continuity of service upon re-engagement. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Labour Law. Case Name: The Depot Manager
Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Army Medical Corps officer is entitled to pay and allowances for an extended period of study leave, when the extension was sanctioned by the President of India. CASE TYPE: Service
Supreme Court on Continuity of Service for Re-engaged Contract Employees: APSRTC vs. A.U.M. Rao (2018) Date of the Judgment: 7 December 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 1018 Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah Can a contract employee, re-engaged after termination, claim continuity of service for the period between termination and
Supreme Court quashes High Court order on FIR in property sale dispute Date of the Judgment: 3 December 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 1001 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a High Court quash a criminal case at an early stage when there are allegations of fraud and the accused has allegedly
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Post-Award Application in Arbitration Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can pass an order on a post-award application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the expiry of the limitation period for challenging the award under Section 34 of the same Act.
Supreme Court Rejects Parity in Disciplinary Actions: State of Tamil Nadu vs. M. Mangayarkarasi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of parity should be the sole basis for determining the quantum of punishment in disciplinary proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Disciplinary Proceedings) Case Name: State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. vs. M. Mangayarkarasi and etc.
