Manoj Misra

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) INSC 216 (13 March 2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation has not been paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name:

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) INSC 216 (13 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation hasn’t been paid, even if possession was taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Eviction, Judges, Manoj Misra, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20(4)

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 1, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5981 of 2014 Judges: Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Aravind Kumar Can a tenant be evicted for a minor discrepancy in the claimed rent amount, even after depositing the

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for dismissal of complaints under Section 256 CrPC: BLS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Rajwant Singh & Ors. (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 256, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 311, Dismissal of Complaint, Judges, Manoj Misra, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court on Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Appearance of Complainant Date of the Judgment: March 1, 2023Citation: 2023 INSC 1872Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Manoj Misra Can a criminal complaint be dismissed solely for the complainant’s absence, even after their evidence has been recorded? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for dismissal of complaints under Section 256 CrPC: BLS Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Rajwant Singh & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/s. BLS Infrastructure Limited vs. M/s. Rajwant Singh & Others (2023) INSC 177 (01 March 2023)

/ Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 256, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 311, Judges, Manoj Misra, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases Date of the Judgment: 01 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 177 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Manoj Misra Can a criminal complaint be dismissed for the complainant’s absence even after their evidence has been recorded? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases: M/s. BLS Infrastructure Limited vs. M/s. Rajwant Singh & Others (2023) INSC 177 (01 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Eviction, Judges, Manoj Misra, Rent Control, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20(4)

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant is entitled to protection from eviction under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, if they deposit the arrears of rent, interest, and costs, even if

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top