Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Time Limit for Wildlife Stock Declaration: Vishalakshi Amma vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the time limit prescribed for declaring possession of wildlife articles under the Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is mandatory or can be relaxed. CASE TYPE: Wildlife Law Case Name: Vishalakshi Amma vs. State […]
Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Time Limit for Wildlife Stock Declaration: Vishalakshi Amma vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the time limit prescribed for declaring possession of wildlife articles under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and the Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003, is mandatory or can be relaxed. CASE TYPE: Wildlife
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 239 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the landowner refuses compensation after a consent award? The Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 253 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and Manoj Misra, J. Can a land owner refuse compensation after a consent award and then claim the acquisition has lapsed? The Supreme Court of India addressed
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation has not been paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name:
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation hasn’t been paid, even if possession was taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Union
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 1, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5981 of 2014 Judges: Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Aravind Kumar Can a tenant be evicted for a minor discrepancy in the claimed rent amount, even after depositing the
Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant is entitled to protection from eviction under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, if they deposit the arrears of rent, interest, and costs, even if
Supreme Court Reinstates Complaints Dismissed for Non-Appearance in Cheque Bounce Cases Date of the Judgment: 01 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 177 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Manoj Misra Can a criminal complaint be dismissed for the complainant’s absence even after their evidence has been recorded? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this
Supreme Court on Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Appearance of Complainant Date of the Judgment: March 1, 2023Citation: 2023 INSC 1872Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Manoj Misra Can a criminal complaint be dismissed solely for the complainant’s absence, even after their evidence has been recorded? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question
