Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Supreme Court settles property reconveyance dispute in civil appeal: R. Srinivasan vs. V. Chandrasekaran (19 April 2018)

/ Agreement, Contract Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Property Law, Reconveyance of Property

Supreme Court Settles Property Reconveyance Dispute: R. Srinivasan vs. V. Chandrasekaran (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute on reconveyance of property. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal. Case Name: R. Srinivasan vs. V. Chandrasekaran Judgment Date: 19 April 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19 April 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, and […]

Supreme Court settles property reconveyance dispute in civil appeal: R. Srinivasan vs. V. Chandrasekaran (19 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies time limits for filing election disputes in cooperative societies: Reji Thomas & Ors. vs. State of Kerala & Ors. (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 243ZK, Election Disputes, Judges, Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969, Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969 with Section 69, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha

Supreme Court on Extending Time for Election Petitions in Cooperative Societies Date of the Judgment: April 19, 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 332 Judges: Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, JJ. Can a High Court extend the deadline for filing an election petition under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies time limits for filing election disputes in cooperative societies: Reji Thomas & Ors. vs. State of Kerala & Ors. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Long-Serving Teacher Despite Qualification Issue: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

/ Employment Law, Equity in Employment, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Service Law, Teacher Employment

Supreme Court Protects Long-Serving Teacher Despite Qualification Issue: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a teacher with long service can be removed for lacking requisite qualifications. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 17, 2018 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Protects Long-Serving Teacher Despite Qualification Issue: Syed Aftab Haider vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Unqualified Traditional Medicine Practitioners: Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum vs. State of Kerala (2018)

/ Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 with Section 17, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R.K. Agrawal, Travancore-Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953, Travancore-Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 with Section 23, Travancore-Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 with Section 38

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Unqualified Traditional Medicine Practitioners: Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum vs. State of Kerala (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether individuals lacking formal qualifications and registration can practice traditional medicine as ‘Paramparya Vaidyas’. CASE TYPE: Regulatory Law/Health Law Case Name: Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum vs. State of Kerala and Others [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Unqualified Traditional Medicine Practitioners: Kerala Ayurveda Paramparya Vaidya Forum vs. State of Kerala (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds UPSC’s Selection Process for IPS: Union Public Service Commission vs. M. Sathiya Priya (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 320, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Promotion, Selection Process, Service Law, Service Law with IPS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955, Regulation 5

Supreme Court Upholds UPSC’s Selection Process for IPS: Union Public Service Commission vs. M. Sathiya Priya (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and High Court can reassess the merit of candidates already assessed by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) Selection Committee for promotions to the Indian Police Service (IPS). CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds UPSC’s Selection Process for IPS: Union Public Service Commission vs. M. Sathiya Priya (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes defamation case against K.K. Mishra: A case of misuse of Section 199(2) CrPC

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 199(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 499, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Offences Relating to Defamation, Public Prosecutor, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court quashes defamation case against K.K. Mishra: A case of misuse of Section 199(2) CrPC LEGAL ISSUE: Whether statements made against a public servant are connected to their public duties for a defamation case under Section 199(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: K.K. Mishra vs. The State

Supreme Court quashes defamation case against K.K. Mishra: A case of misuse of Section 199(2) CrPC Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Re-verification of Manipur Civil Services Exam Answer Sheets: Tongbram Bimolchand Singh vs. Yumlembam Surjit Singh (2018)

/ Civil Procedure Code, Judges, Judicial Review, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Order for Inquiry, Public Examinations, Service Law

Supreme Court Directs Re-verification of Manipur Civil Services Exam Answer Sheets: Tongbram Bimolchand Singh vs. Yumlembam Surjit Singh (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 12, 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 327 Judges: Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, JJ. Can a court order a complete re-evaluation of an exam when irregularities are found in a

Supreme Court Directs Re-verification of Manipur Civil Services Exam Answer Sheets: Tongbram Bimolchand Singh vs. Yumlembam Surjit Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of status quo orders in petroleum dealership guidelines: K.K. Gupta & Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association & Anr. (2018)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order 39, Contempt Jurisdiction, Contempt of Court, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Scope of Contempt, Status Quo

Supreme Court Clarifies Status Quo Orders in Petroleum Dealership Guidelines: K.K. Gupta vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of status quo orders in the context of policy guidelines. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal, Contempt Jurisdiction Case Name: K.K. Gupta & Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association & Anr. [Judgment Date]: April

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of status quo orders in petroleum dealership guidelines: K.K. Gupta & Ors. vs. Himachal Pradesh Petroleum Dealers Association & Anr. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Salary for Long-Serving Teacher: Aparbal Yadav vs. State of U.P. (2018)

/ Appellate Jurisdiction, Interim Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Salary Disputes, Service Law

Supreme Court Restores Salary for Long-Serving Teacher: Aparbal Yadav vs. State of U.P. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the High Court regarding salary payment should be modified by a Division Bench during the pendency of a writ petition. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Aparbal Yadav vs.

Supreme Court Restores Salary for Long-Serving Teacher: Aparbal Yadav vs. State of U.P. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Freedom Fighter Pension to Senior Citizens: Rambhau vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Freedom Fighter Pension, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Pension Law, Pensionary Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Grants Freedom Fighter Pension to Senior Citizens: Rambhau vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether senior citizens who were previously granted freedom fighter pensions, which were later cancelled, should have their pensions reinstated. CASE TYPE: Pension/Service Law Case Name: Rambhau S/O Tulshiram Ghuge vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Grants Freedom Fighter Pension to Senior Citizens: Rambhau vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Murder Case: Kameshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar (2018)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Offences Against Human Body, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Murder Case: Kameshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to convict the accused of murder and destruction of evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Kameshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar & Ors. Judgment Date: April 9, 2018 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Gruesome Murder Case: Kameshwar Singh vs. State of Bihar (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Resumption Based on Compromise: Raghunath Prasad Pande vs. State of Karnataka (2018)

/ Judges, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 111, Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 with Section 14, Land Resumption, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha

Supreme Court Upholds Land Resumption Based on Compromise: Raghunath Prasad Pande vs. State of Karnataka (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 6, 2018 Citation: Raghunath Prasad Pande vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 3621 of 2018, arising out of SLP (C) No. 28906 of 2013 Judges: Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Land Resumption Based on Compromise: Raghunath Prasad Pande vs. State of Karnataka (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top