Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Non-Commercial Ganja Case: Birbal Prasad vs. State of Bihar (25 January 2018)

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Non-Commercial Ganja Case: Birbal Prasad vs. State of Bihar (2018) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 48 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Can an individual be granted bail when caught with a non-commercial quantity of an illegal substance, […]

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Non-Commercial Ganja Case: Birbal Prasad vs. State of Bihar (25 January 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court to Re-Examine Eligibility Criteria for District Judge Appointments: Dheeraj Mor vs. High Court of Delhi (23 January 2018)

Supreme Court on Eligibility for District Judge Appointments: Dheeraj Mor vs. High Court of Delhi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Article 233 of the Constitution of India regarding the eligibility criteria for direct recruitment of District Judges. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Dheeraj Mor vs. Hon’ble High Court of Delhi Judgment Date:

Supreme Court to Re-Examine Eligibility Criteria for District Judge Appointments: Dheeraj Mor vs. High Court of Delhi (23 January 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Right to Choose Employment Over Compensation in Compassionate Appointment Case

Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Right to Choose Employment Over Compensation in Compassionate Appointment Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a female dependent of a deceased employee has the right to choose employment over monetary compensation as per a bipartite agreement. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Compassionate Appointment Case Name: Smt. Subhadra vs. The Ministry of Coal and Anr. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Employee’s Right to Choose Employment Over Compensation in Compassionate Appointment Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for District Judge Appointments: Dheeraj Mor vs. High Court of Delhi (2018)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Article 233 of the Constitution of India regarding the eligibility criteria for direct recruitment of District Judges. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Dheeraj Mor vs. Hon’ble High Court of Delhi Judgment Date: 23 January 2018 Date of the Judgment: 23 January 2018 The Supreme Court of India, in a batch

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for District Judge Appointments: Dheeraj Mor vs. High Court of Delhi (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court disposes of land acquisition compensation appeals: Nachhatar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2018)

Supreme Court disposes of land acquisition compensation appeals: Nachhatar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Nachhatar Singh Etc. Etc. vs. The State of Punjab & Ors. [Judgment Date]: January 22, 2018 Date of the Judgment: January 22, 2018 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Kurian

Supreme Court disposes of land acquisition compensation appeals: Nachhatar Singh vs. State of Punjab (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Re-evaluation of Fruit Tree Valuation: State of Punjab vs. Thuru Ram (2018)

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case: State of Punjab vs. Thuru Ram (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Valuation of fruit trees on acquired land. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: State of Punjab and Ors. vs. Thuru Ram. [Judgment Date]: January 19, 2018 Date of the Judgment: January 19, 2018. Citation: Not Available. Judges: Arun Mishra, J.

Supreme Court Remands Land Compensation Case for Re-evaluation of Fruit Tree Valuation: State of Punjab vs. Thuru Ram (2018) Read Post »

Caste Certificate Validity After Inter-Caste Marriage: Supreme Court Decision in Sunita Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

Supreme Court Rules on Caste Certificates After Inter-Caste Marriage: Sunita Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Date of the Judgment: 19 January 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 17 Judges: Arun Mishra, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a person’s caste be changed after marrying someone from a different caste? The Supreme Court addressed this

Caste Certificate Validity After Inter-Caste Marriage: Supreme Court Decision in Sunita Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Election Petition: Tripurari Sharan vs. Ranjit Kumar Yadav (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Election Petition: Tripurari Sharan vs. Ranjit Kumar Yadav (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the validity of an election petition and the High Court’s decision on it. CASE TYPE: Election Law Case Name: Tripurari Sharan & Anr. vs. Ranjit Kumar Yadav & Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Election Petition: Tripurari Sharan vs. Ranjit Kumar Yadav (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of ‘Next Friend’ in Suits Filed on Behalf of Minors: Nagaiah vs. Chowdamma (2018) INSC 12

Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of ‘Next Friend’ in Suits Filed on Behalf of Minors: Nagaiah vs. Chowdamma (2018) INSC 12 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an elder brother can act as the ‘next friend’ of his minor brother in a property dispute case, when their father, the natural guardian, has conflicting interests. CASE TYPE: Civil Property

Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of ‘Next Friend’ in Suits Filed on Behalf of Minors: Nagaiah vs. Chowdamma (2018) INSC 12 Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Finality to Land Acquisition: H.N. Jagannath vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court can decide on the validity of land acquisition notifications and proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: H. N. Jagannath & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Judgment Date: 06 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 1049 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Mohan

Supreme Court Restores Finality to Land Acquisition: H.N. Jagannath vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Landowners from Unfair Compensation in Delayed Land Acquisition: Mitesh Kumar Ramanbhai Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017)

Date of the Judgment: November 16, 2017 Citation: Mitesh Kumar Ramanbhai Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors., Civil Appeal No(s). 19501-19503 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 21067-21069 of 2014) Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar. Can the government use consent forms obtained years

Supreme Court Protects Landowners from Unfair Compensation in Delayed Land Acquisition: Mitesh Kumar Ramanbhai Patel & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Tarun Pal Singh & Ors. (15 November 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 concerning the applicability of compensation under the new Act. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Tarun Pal Singh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 15 November 2017 Introduction

Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of Section 24 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Tarun Pal Singh & Ors. (15 November 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top