N. V. Ramana

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case due to lack of corroborative evidence: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Naveen Kumar (2018)

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case due to lack of corroborative evidence: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Naveen Kumar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an accused can be convicted based solely on an improved statement of an eyewitness without corroborative evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Naveen Kumar Judgment […]

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case due to lack of corroborative evidence: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Naveen Kumar (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak circumstantial evidence: Suresh vs State of Haryana (21 August 2018)

Date of the Judgment: 21 August 2018 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: N. V. Ramana, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a conviction be upheld when based solely on circumstantial evidence that doesn’t form a complete chain? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a criminal appeal, ultimately overturning

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak circumstantial evidence: Suresh vs State of Haryana (21 August 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of revisional powers under Section 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in land fraud case: Rajendra Rajoriya vs. Jagat Narain Thapak (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Revisional Powers under Section 398 CrPC: Rajendra Rajoriya vs. Jagat Narain Thapak (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of revisional powers under Section 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Rajendra Rajoriya vs. Jagat Narain Thapak and Another Judgment Date: 23 February 2018 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of revisional powers under Section 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in land fraud case: Rajendra Rajoriya vs. Jagat Narain Thapak (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles adoption custom in Jain Community: Ratanlal vs. Sundarabai (2017)

Date of the Judgment: 22 November 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: N. V. Ramana, J. and Amitava Roy, J. Can a married man be validly adopted, especially within the Jain community? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a dispute over the adoption of Ratanlal by his uncle, Govardhandas. The court

Supreme Court settles adoption custom in Jain Community: Ratanlal vs. Sundarabai (2017) Read Post »

Front-Running by Non-Intermediaries: Supreme Court Clarifies Securities Market Regulations (20 September 2017)

Can individuals who are not intermediaries be held liable for front-running in the securities market? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in a series of appeals, clarifying the scope of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003. This judgment provides crucial insights into

Front-Running by Non-Intermediaries: Supreme Court Clarifies Securities Market Regulations (20 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Non-Intermediary Front-Running” under SEBI Regulations: SEBI vs. Kanaiyalal Baldevbhai Patel (2017)

Date of the Judgment: September 20, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 763 Judges: N. V. Ramana, J., Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can individuals who are not intermediaries be held liable for front-running in the securities market? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a batch of appeals, clarifying the scope of the Securities and

Supreme Court Clarifies “Non-Intermediary Front-Running” under SEBI Regulations: SEBI vs. Kanaiyalal Baldevbhai Patel (2017) Read Post »

Pharmacy Registration: Supreme Court settles the applicability of First Register after State Reorganization (2017) INSC 607 (3 July 2017)

Can a newly formed state create a fresh register of pharmacists, or does the existing register of the parent state apply? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in a case concerning the reorganization of states and the registration of pharmacists. This judgment clarifies the legal position of pharmacist registrations after state divisions.

Pharmacy Registration: Supreme Court settles the applicability of First Register after State Reorganization (2017) INSC 607 (3 July 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top