N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Property Deed Cancellation Cases: Narendra Kumar Mittal & Ors. vs. M/S Nupur Housing Development Pvt. Ltd. (2019) INSC 712 (31 July 2019)

/ Fraud, Judges, Jurisdiction of Courts, Land Disputes, N.V. Ramana, Property Law, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sale Deed, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 with Section 331

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Property Deed Cancellation Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court has jurisdiction to hear a suit for cancellation of a sale deed for agricultural land when the plaintiff is a recorded tenure holder. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Property Law Case Name: Narendra Kumar Mittal & Ors. vs. M/S […]

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Property Deed Cancellation Cases: Narendra Kumar Mittal & Ors. vs. M/S Nupur Housing Development Pvt. Ltd. (2019) INSC 712 (31 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies FERV Apportionment in Power Tariffs: Power Grid Corporation vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Co. (2019)

/ Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 with Regulation 1.13(a), Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 with Regulations 1.3 and 1.7, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Tariff Regulations, 2001

Supreme Court on Foreign Exchange Rate Variation (FERV) Apportionment in Power Tariffs LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Foreign Exchange Rate Variation (FERV) should be apportioned between debt and equity after being added to the capital cost in power tariffs. CASE TYPE: Electricity Regulatory Law Case Name: Power Grid Corporation of India vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

Supreme Court clarifies FERV Apportionment in Power Tariffs: Power Grid Corporation vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Co. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Collusive Decree in Property Dispute: Jaswant Singh & Ors. vs. Jaspal Singh & Ors. (2019) INSC 459 (07 May 2019)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Collusive Decree, Decree, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Property Law, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Collusive Decree in Property Dispute Date of the Judgment: 07 May 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 459 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J. and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a court decree be challenged if it is found to be collusive and aimed at circumventing the law? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Collusive Decree in Property Dispute: Jaswant Singh & Ors. vs. Jaspal Singh & Ors. (2019) INSC 459 (07 May 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on unreliable dying declaration: Poonam Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh (30 April 2019)

/ Criminal Law, Dying Declaration, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on unreliable dying declaration: Poonam Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility and reliability of dying declarations as sole evidence for conviction. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Poonam Bai vs. The State of Chhattisgarh Judgment Date: 30 April 2019 Date of the Judgment: 30 April 2019 Citation: (2019)

Supreme Court overturns conviction based on unreliable dying declaration: Poonam Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh (30 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in dowry death case: Jagdishraj Khatta vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2019)

/ Indian Arms Act, Indian Arms Act with Section 30, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Women, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court overturns conviction in dowry death case: Jagdishraj Khatta vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in overturning the Trial Court’s acquittal based on a letter of doubtful authenticity and general oral testimonies in a case of alleged dowry death. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Jagdishraj Khatta

Supreme Court overturns conviction in dowry death case: Jagdishraj Khatta vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Sadayappan vs. State (26 April 2019)

/ Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Interested Witness, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Murder, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Sadayappan vs. State (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of the accused for murder based on circumstantial evidence and the testimonies of related witnesses is valid. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Sadayappan @ Ganesan vs. State, Represented by Inspector of Police Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Sadayappan vs. State (26 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability under Section 149 IPC in mob violence case: Bal Mukund Sharma vs. State of Bihar (2019)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court clarifies liability under Section 149 IPC in mob violence case: Bal Mukund Sharma vs. State of Bihar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether all members of an unlawful assembly are liable for murder if one member commits the act, under Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Bal Mukund

Supreme Court clarifies liability under Section 149 IPC in mob violence case: Bal Mukund Sharma vs. State of Bihar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX, Due Process, Ex-parte Decree, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Restoration of Possession

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether possession obtained through an ex-parte decree can be sustained if the decree is subsequently set aside. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Om Prakash Ram vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. Judgment Date: April 15,

Supreme Court Restores Possession After Ex-Parte Decree Set Aside: Om Prakash Ram vs. State of Bihar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019)

/ Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Extra-Judicial Confession, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Murder, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019) Date of the Judgment: April 05, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 311 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J., Indira Banerjee, J. Can a conviction for murder be sustained solely on circumstantial evidence? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Manoj Kumar vs. State of Uttarakhand (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Abduction: Pattu Rajan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (29 March 2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 154, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 173(8), Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 313, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Evidence Act with Section 27, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Abduction: Pattu Rajan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a second First Information Report (FIR) is permissible for a murder that occurs during the investigation of an earlier abduction case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Pattu Rajan vs. The State of Tamil

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Abduction: Pattu Rajan vs. State of Tamil Nadu (29 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Abduction Case: P. Rajagopal vs. State of Tamil Nadu (29 March 2019)

/ Abduction, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 109, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 352, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 365, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Abduction Case: P. Rajagopal vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2019) Date of the Judgment: 29 March 2019 Citation: Criminal Appeal Nos. 820-821 of 2009 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J., and Indira Banerjee, J. Can a conviction for abduction be upheld when some of the accused are acquitted?

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Abduction Case: P. Rajagopal vs. State of Tamil Nadu (29 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case due to inconsistent witness statements: Amrika Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh (29 March 2019)

/ Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 147, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Murder, N.V. Ramana, Unlawful Assembly, Witness Testimony

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case due to inconsistent witness statements: Amrika Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was part of an unlawful assembly with the common objective of murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Amrika Bai vs. The State of Chhattisgarh Judgment Date: 29 March 2019 Date

Supreme Court acquits accused in murder case due to inconsistent witness statements: Amrika Bai vs. State of Chhattisgarh (29 March 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top