N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under Construction Management Agreements: DLF Home Developers vs. Rajapura Homes (22 September 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Breach of contract, Construction Management Agreement, Contract Law, International Commercial Arbitration, Judges, Kompetenz Kompetenz, N.V. Ramana, Share Purchase Agreement, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Disputes Under Construction Management Agreements: DLF Home Developers vs. Rajapura Homes (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disputes arising from Construction Management Agreements can be referred to arbitration under the arbitration clause of the Construction Management Agreements, or whether they fall under the ambit of the Share Purchase Agreements. CASE TYPE: Arbitration […]

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under Construction Management Agreements: DLF Home Developers vs. Rajapura Homes (22 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Suit Due to Lack of Proven Possession: Balasubramanian vs. M. Arockiasamy (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Hrishikesh Roy, Injunction, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Second Appeal, Section 100, Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Suit Due to Lack of Proven Possession: Balasubramanian vs. M. Arockiasamy (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for a bare injunction is maintainable when the plaintiff’s title is disputed and they fail to prove their possession of the suit property. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Suit Due to Lack of Proven Possession: Balasubramanian vs. M. Arockiasamy (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Surajdeo Mahto vs. State of Bihar (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 106, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 35, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 with Section 7A, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Surajdeo Mahto vs. State of Bihar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether circumstantial evidence was sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused in a murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Surajdeo Mahto and Anr. vs. The State of Bihar Judgment Date: 04 August

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence: Surajdeo Mahto vs. State of Bihar (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Honor Killing Case: Mamta Nair vs. State of Rajasthan (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Bail, Criminal Procedure, Criminal Procedure with Section 452, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Honor Killing Case: Mamta Nair vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in granting bail to the accused despite the Supreme Court previously canceling his bail due to prima facie evidence against him. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mamta Nair vs. State of Rajasthan

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Honor Killing Case: Mamta Nair vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Soon Before” in Dowry Death Cases: Satbir Singh vs. State of Haryana (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 306, Judges, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court clarifies “Soon Before” in Dowry Death Cases: Satbir Singh vs. State of Haryana (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “soon before” in dowry death cases under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Satbir Singh & Another vs. State of Haryana [Judgment Date]: May 28, 2021 Date

Supreme Court clarifies “Soon Before” in Dowry Death Cases: Satbir Singh vs. State of Haryana (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (28 May 2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Related to Marriage, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused was guilty of dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab Judgment Date: 28 May 2021 Date of the Judgment: 28 May

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction: Gurmeet Singh vs. State of Punjab (28 May 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court restricts High Court’s power to grant protection after rejecting anticipatory bail in criminal cases (28 May 2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Anticipatory Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, Surya Kant

Supreme Court restricts High Court’s power to grant protection after rejecting anticipatory bail in criminal cases (28 May 2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can grant protection from arrest to an accused after rejecting their anticipatory bail application. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Nathu Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. AND

Supreme Court restricts High Court’s power to grant protection after rejecting anticipatory bail in criminal cases (28 May 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Self-Employed Individuals in Motor Accident Claims: Rahul Sharma vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2021)

/ Accident Law, Aniruddha Bose, Compensation Calculation, Judges, Motor Accident Claims, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 140, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, N.V. Ramana, Personal Injury Law, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Self-Employed Individuals in Motor Accident Claims: Rahul Sharma vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2021 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: N.V. Ramana, CJI., Surya Kant, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. (Majority Bench, authored by N.V. Ramana, CJI) Can a self-employed individual receive the same

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Self-Employed Individuals in Motor Accident Claims: Rahul Sharma vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between a business license and a rent agreement in Mangala Waman Karandikar vs. Prakash Damodar Ranade (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Contract Law, Contractual Interpretation, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 92, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 95, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Business License vs. Rent Agreement: Mangala Waman Karandikar vs. Prakash Damodar Ranade (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an agreement to run an existing business constitutes a license of the business itself or a lease of the premises where the business is located. CASE TYPE: Civil Law (Contractual Dispute) Case Name: Mangala Waman Karandikar

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between a business license and a rent agreement in Mangala Waman Karandikar vs. Prakash Damodar Ranade (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction in fratricide case: Mallappa vs. State of Karnataka (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Criminal Law, Evidence Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Murder, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction in fratricide case: Mallappa vs. State of Karnataka (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in overturning the Trial Court’s acquittal in a case of murder based on circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Murder Case Name: Mallappa vs. State of Karnataka Judgment

Supreme Court overturns High Court conviction in fratricide case: Mallappa vs. State of Karnataka (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration Act, 1940, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 30, Arbitration Act, 1940 with Section 33, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Escalation Charges, Fixed Price Clause, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Rebate, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: March 04, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 127 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Surya Kant, J., and Aniruddha Bose, J. Can an arbitrator’s decision on contract interpretation be challenged in court if

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Award on Rebate and Escalation in Construction Contract Dispute: NTPC Ltd. vs. Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Transfer of Funds in Cheque Bounce Case: M/S Kalamani Tex vs. P. Balasubramanian (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 362, Criminal Law, Judges, Modification of Orders, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Transfer of Funds in Cheque Bounce Case: M/S Kalamani Tex vs. P. Balasubramanian (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of a court order regarding the transfer of funds. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: M/S Kalamani Tex and Anr. vs. P. Balasubramanian [Judgment Date]: 24 February 2021 Date of the Judgment: 24 February

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Transfer of Funds in Cheque Bounce Case: M/S Kalamani Tex vs. P. Balasubramanian (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top