P. Sathasivam

Supreme Court settles the maintainability of Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for daily wagers claiming bonus: H.P. State Electricity Board vs. Ranjeet Singh (2008)

/ Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 33-C(2), Judges, P. Sathasivam, Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 with Section 10, Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 with Section 2(11), Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 with Section 8

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 5, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J. Can daily wage employees claim statutory bonus through an application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a batch of appeals concerning the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board’s denial of […]

Supreme Court settles the maintainability of Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for daily wagers claiming bonus: H.P. State Electricity Board vs. Ranjeet Singh (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the onus of proof in confiscation of vehicles used for forest offences: State of West Bengal vs. Mahua Sarkar (2008)

/ Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, Indian Forest Act, 1927, Indian Forest Act, 1927 with Section 59A, Indian Forest Act, 1927 with Section 59B, Judges, P. Sathasivam

Introduction Date of the Judgment: February 27, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J. When a vehicle is used to commit a forest offence, can it be confiscated even if the owner claims to be unaware of the illegal activity? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the

Supreme Court clarifies the onus of proof in confiscation of vehicles used for forest offences: State of West Bengal vs. Mahua Sarkar (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration of Will in Property Dispute: N. Srihari (D) vs. N. Prakash (2008)

/ Arijit Pasayat, Judges, P. Sathasivam, Partition Suit, Property Law, Will Interpretation, Wills and Estates, Wills and Estates with Andhra Pradesh (Telangana) Area Abolition of Enams Act, 1955

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Case Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat & P. Sathasivam In a dispute over property rights, can a will that is referenced in court documents but not formally presented as evidence be considered? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration of Will in Property Dispute: N. Srihari (D) vs. N. Prakash (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land surrender disputes under Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act: State of A.P. vs. Singi Reddy Ramulu (2007)

/ Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act, Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act with Section 10(5)(a)(ii), Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, Judges, P. Sathasivam

Date of the Judgment: December 12, 2007 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J. Can a state government’s decision to accept the surrender of land be challenged if there’s a pre-existing dispute over its possession? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in a case concerning the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings)

Supreme Court clarifies land surrender disputes under Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act: State of A.P. vs. Singi Reddy Ramulu (2007) Read Post »

Scroll to Top