Judges

Supreme Court clarifies Career Advancement Scheme for NIT teachers: National Institute of Technology vs. Om Prakash Rahi (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Career Advancement Scheme, Judges, National Institute of Technology Act, 2007, National Institute of Technology Act, 2007 with Section 26(1), Promotions in Educational Institutions, Service Law, Statutes for NITs

Supreme Court clarifies Career Advancement Scheme for NIT teachers: National Institute of Technology vs. Om Prakash Rahi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) for teachers in National Institutes of Technology (NITs) allows for automatic promotion to a higher pay band and redesignation upon completion of a certain number of years of service, […]

Supreme Court clarifies Career Advancement Scheme for NIT teachers: National Institute of Technology vs. Om Prakash Rahi (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Recovery of Excess Payments to In-Service Nursing Trainees: Mekha Ram vs. State of Rajasthan (29 March 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 144, Deputation, Judges, M.R. Shah, Recovery of Payments, Service Law, Study Leave

Supreme Court Upholds Recovery of Excess Payments to In-Service Nursing Trainees: Mekha Ram vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can recover excess payments made to in-service candidates who were on study leave for nursing training, when such payments were made under a previous court order that was later overturned. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Recovery of Excess Payments to In-Service Nursing Trainees: Mekha Ram vs. State of Rajasthan (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (29 March 2022)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 29, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 30, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a licensed gun owner is liable under the Arms Act if their firearm is used in a crime without their knowledge or consent. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Tarlochan Singh @ Rana VERSUS State of

Supreme Court Acquits License Holder in Arms Act Case: Tarlochan Singh vs State of Punjab (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Pro-Rata Wage Deductions for “Go Slow” Tactics in Industrial Dispute: Bata India Limited vs. Workmen of Bata India Limited (29 March 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Go Slow Tactics, Industrial Disputes, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10-B, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 10(3), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 33-C(1), Judges, Pro-Rata Wage Deduction, Sanjiv Khanna

Bata India Limited vs. Workmen of Bata India Limited: Supreme Court on Pro-Rata Wages for “Go Slow” Tactics Date of the Judgment: 29 March 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 188 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Sanjiv Khanna Can an employer deduct wages for employees who deliberately slow down production, a tactic known as “go slow”?

Supreme Court clarifies Pro-Rata Wage Deductions for “Go Slow” Tactics in Industrial Dispute: Bata India Limited vs. Workmen of Bata India Limited (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 18 of the Limitation Act in IBC cases: SVG Fashions vs. Ritu Goyal (29 March 2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 8, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 9, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 18, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court on Limitation under IBC: SVG Fashions vs. Ritu Goyal (2022) Date of the Judgment: 29 March 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 234 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. (authored the judgment) Can a letter acknowledging a debt, along with dishonored cheques, revive a time-barred claim under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)? The

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 18 of the Limitation Act in IBC cases: SVG Fashions vs. Ritu Goyal (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Authority’s Right to Reject Auction Sale: Municipal Committee, Barwala vs. Jai Narayan and Company (2022)

/ Haryana Municipal Act, 1973, Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 with Section 250, Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 with Section 61, Haryana Municipalities Management of Municipal Properties and State Properties Rules, 1976, Haryana Municipalities Management of Municipal Properties and State Properties Rules, 1976 with Rule 2, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Property Law, Public Auction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Authority’s Right to Reject Auction Sale: Municipal Committee, Barwala vs. Jai Narayan and Company (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a successful bidder in a public auction has a legal right to demand execution of a sale deed if the auction is not confirmed by the competent authority. CASE TYPE: Civil Law –

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Authority’s Right to Reject Auction Sale: Municipal Committee, Barwala vs. Jai Narayan and Company (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Dinesh Maheshwari, Employees Compensation Act, 1933, Employees Compensation Act, 1933 with Section 30, Judges, Labour Law, Workmen Compensation

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 29, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 256 Judges: Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Aniruddha Bose Can a sudden cardiac arrest during work be considered an employment-related injury, entitling the family to compensation?

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Auto Driver’s Death Due to Cardiac Arrest: C. Manjamma vs. The Divisional Manager (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case: Rajesh Gupta vs. CBI (29 March 2022)

/ Admissibility of Evidence, Criminal Misconduct, Evidence Law, Interested Witness Testimony, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 20, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case: Rajesh Gupta vs. CBI (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the demand and acceptance of a bribe by a public servant was proven beyond reasonable doubt under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Prevention of Corruption Act. Case Name: Rajesh Gupta vs. State through Central Bureau

Supreme Court overturns conviction in corruption case: Rajesh Gupta vs. CBI (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Accident Victim: Master Ayush vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (29 March 2022)

/ Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Schedule II of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Accident Victim: Master Ayush vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Assessment of just compensation in motor accident claims involving permanent disability, particularly for a minor victim. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Master Ayush vs. The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Paraplegic Accident Victim: Master Ayush vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (29 March 2022) Read Post »

Limitation in Property Disputes: Supreme Court Divided on Plaint Rejection in Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (28 March 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VII Rule 11(d), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XII Rule 6, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 17, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 3, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Addresses Limitation in Property Dispute: Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2022 The Supreme Court of India heard a case regarding a property dispute where the main issue was whether the suit was filed within the time limit set by law. The case, *Saranpal Kaur

Limitation in Property Disputes: Supreme Court Divided on Plaint Rejection in Saranpal Kaur Anand vs. Praduman Singh Chandhok (28 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Reassessment Notice: M.R. Shah Logistics Case (2022)

/ Finance Act, 2016, Finance Act, 2016 with Section 192, Income Declaration Scheme, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 147, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 148, Judges, Reassessment, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Reassessment Notice: M.R. Shah Logistics Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a reassessment notice under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be issued based on tangible material indicating income has escaped assessment, even if the assessee claims the income was declared under the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) by another entity.

Supreme Court Upholds Reassessment Notice: M.R. Shah Logistics Case (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe and Anticipatory Bail in Multiple FIRs: Sanchit Alagh vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 438, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe and Anticipatory Bail in Multiple FIRs: Sanchit Alagh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether to transfer investigation to CBI and grant anticipatory bail in multiple FIRs with similar allegations. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sanchit Alagh & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: March 28,

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe and Anticipatory Bail in Multiple FIRs: Sanchit Alagh vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top