Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Assaulting Senior Officer: Union of India vs. Managobinda Samantaray (24 February 2022)

/ Appellate Powers, Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 52 of the CISF Rules, 2001

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Assaulting Senior Officer LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellate authority’s decision to enhance the penalty of a CISF constable from reduction of pay to dismissal was justified, and whether the High Court’s intervention in reducing the punishment was appropriate. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India […]

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Assaulting Senior Officer: Union of India vs. Managobinda Samantaray (24 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Blacklisting Period for Contractor in Odisha Flyover Collapse Case: State of Odisha vs. M/s Panda Infraproject Limited (2022)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Law with Show Cause Notice, B.V. Nagarathna, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contract Law with Blacklisting, Judges, M.R. Shah, Natural Justice

Supreme Court Limits Blacklisting Period for Contractor in Odisha Flyover Collapse Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractor can be permanently blacklisted for lapses in construction leading to a fatal accident. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Public Works Case Name: State of Odisha & Ors. vs. M/s Panda Infraproject Limited [Judgment Date]: 24 February 2022 Date of

Supreme Court Limits Blacklisting Period for Contractor in Odisha Flyover Collapse Case: State of Odisha vs. M/s Panda Infraproject Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Judges, Review Jurisdiction, Review Petition, Service Law, State of Uttar Pradesh, Supreme Court of India, Teacher Recruitment, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition filed by non-parties to a previous litigation should be entertained when the issue has been considered multiple times. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vijay Pratap Yadav and Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Rejects Review Petition on Uttar Pradesh Teacher Recruitment: Vijay Pratap Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (23 February 2022)

/ Agricultural Produce Market Committees, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 with Section 9, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1963 with Rule 45, Renting of Immovable Property, Service Tax

Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property by Agricultural Produce Market Committees: Supreme Court Judgment Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) be exempted from service tax on renting out immovable property? The Supreme Court of India

Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Upholds Tax Liability of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Agricultural Market Committees Liable for Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Judgment (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Exemption Notifications, Judges, M.R. Shah, Powers and Duties of Market Committees, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 with Section 9, Service Tax Law, Service Tax Law with Finance Act, 1994

Agricultural Market Committees Liable for Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Judgment (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Agricultural Produce Market Committees are liable to pay service tax on renting immovable property. CASE TYPE: Service Tax Case Name: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Mandi Yard, Alwar vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Alwar

Agricultural Market Committees Liable for Service Tax on Renting Immovable Property: Supreme Court Judgment (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Judges, Jurisdiction of Courts, M.R. Shah, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can transfer cases from Special Courts to jurisdictional courts in a disposed of matter on a special mentioning. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Transfer of Land Grabbing Cases (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Inherent Powers of High Court, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can transfer cases from Special Courts to jurisdictional courts in a disposed matter. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Central

Supreme Court Quashes Madras High Court Order on Land Grabbing Cases Transfer (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies sub-letting under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (23 February 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 14, Judges, Sub-letting, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Sub-Letting Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1609 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6516/2019) Judges: Vineet Saran, J, Aniruddha Bose, J. Can a tenant be evicted for allowing medical

Supreme Court clarifies sub-letting under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 227, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 14, Eviction, Judges, Sub-letting, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Sub-letting Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23rd February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1609 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6516/2019) Judges: Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose. Can a landlord evict a tenant if

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Damages for EPF Default: Horticulture Experiment Station vs. Regional Provident Fund Organization (23 February 2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Damages for Default, Employees' Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 14B, EPF Contribution, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Damages for EPF Default: Horticulture Experiment Station vs. Regional Provident Fund Organization (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No(s). 2136 of 2012 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka. Can an employer avoid paying damages for late Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contributions by claiming a

Supreme Court Upholds Damages for EPF Default: Horticulture Experiment Station vs. Regional Provident Fund Organization (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Service Tax on Renting by Agricultural Produce Market Committees: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs. Commissioner (23 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Exemption Notifications, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Renting of Immovable Property, Section 9, Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Service Tax Law, Statutory Obligations

Service Tax on Renting by Agricultural Market Committees: Supreme Court Decision LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Agricultural Produce Market Committees are liable to pay service tax on renting of immovable property. CASE TYPE: Service Tax Law Case Name: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, New Mandi Yard, Alwar vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Alwar Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds Service Tax on Renting by Agricultural Produce Market Committees: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs. Commissioner (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case: Sathish Kumar vs. State of Karnataka (23 February 2022)

/ Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Murder, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case: Sathish Kumar vs. State of Karnataka (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 168 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha Can circumstantial evidence alone be enough to convict someone of murder? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Wife’s Murder Case: Sathish Kumar vs. State of Karnataka (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top