Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Seniority Rights in Reinstatement Cases: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors (2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Rules, Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Rules with Rule 18, Reinstatement, Seniority, Service Law, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Seniority Rights in Reinstatement Cases: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining seniority rights of employees reinstated after wrongful termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors [Judgment Date]: 31 January 2022 […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Seniority Rights in Reinstatement Cases: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows suit by unregistered firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022)

/ Civil Law, Contract Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Effect of Non-Registration, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 69, Judges, Property Law, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit filed by an unregistered partnership firm is barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, when the suit is not for enforcement of a right arising from a contract related to the firm’s business. CASE

Supreme Court allows suit by unregistered firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act in cases involving unregistered firms: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (31 January 2022)

/ Dinesh Maheshwari, Effect of Non-Registration, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 69, Judges, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Section 69 of Partnership Act in Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) Date of the Judgment: 31 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 119 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J. and Vikram Nath, J. Can an unregistered partnership firm seek legal recourse against a third party for a transaction not directly related to its core

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act in cases involving unregistered firms: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (31 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Contract Law, Contract Law with ITB 28.1, Government Contracts, Judges, M.R. Shah, Tender Process

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of judicial review in tender processes for foreign-funded projects. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, specifically relating to government tenders and foreign-funded projects. Case Name: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited &

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (2022) INSC 124

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Law, Contract Law with ITB 28.1, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Procurement

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (2022) INSC 124 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can interfere with the tender process of a foreign-funded project when the rejection of a bid is based on the decision of the funding agency and

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (2022) INSC 124 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Market Value, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair market value for land acquired for public purposes. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Madhukar S/O Govindrao Kamble & Ors. vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation & Ors. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition: Madhukar Kamble vs. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of bank employee due to lack of evidence: United Bank of India vs. Biswanath Bhattacharjee (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Departmental Inquiry, Dismissal of Employee, Judges, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, K.M. Joseph, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Service Law with Fair Procedure

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of bank employee due to lack of evidence: United Bank of India vs. Biswanath Bhattacharjee (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a disciplinary authority’s findings can be overturned if they are based on no evidence. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Departmental Inquiry Case Name: United Bank of India vs. Biswanath Bhattacharjee Judgment Date:

Supreme Court quashes dismissal of bank employee due to lack of evidence: United Bank of India vs. Biswanath Bhattacharjee (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rights upon reinstatement: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors (2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Reinstatement, Seniority, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 18, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Seniority Rights in Reinstatement Cases: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of seniority upon reinstatement after wrongful termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Date

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rights upon reinstatement: Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited vs. Basil T K & Ors (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022)

/ Civil Law, Civil Suit, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 69(2), Judges, Property Law, Unregistered Partnership Firm, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an unregistered partnership firm can maintain a suit against a third party for a transaction not related to its regular business. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Partnership Case Name: Shiv Developers Through Its Partner Sunilbhai Somabhai Ajmeri vs. Aksharay

Supreme Court Allows Suit by Unregistered Firm: Shiv Developers vs. Aksharay Developers (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Dismisses Alibi Plea: Pappu Tiwary vs. State of Jharkhand (2022)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 157, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 174, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Dismisses Alibi Plea: Pappu Tiwary vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 31, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 87 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a plea of alibi be accepted without concrete evidence? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case, Dismisses Alibi Plea: Pappu Tiwary vs. State of Jharkhand (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies when limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue in loan recovery suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XIV Rule 2, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Limitation Act, Limitation Act with Article 1, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation for Loan Recovery Suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the issue of limitation in a loan recovery suit can be decided as a preliminary issue without evidence. CASE TYPE: Civil (Loan Recovery) Case Name: M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell Private Limited vs. Manik Sethi [Judgment Date]: 31

Supreme Court clarifies when limitation can be decided as a preliminary issue in loan recovery suits: Mongia Realty vs. Manik Sethi (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs reconsideration of premature release policy for life convicts: Mata Prasad vs. State of U.P. (31 January 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 161, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Offences Against Human Body, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court directs reconsideration of premature release policy for life convicts: Mata Prasad vs. State of U.P. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Premature release of life convicts CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mata Prasad vs. State of U.P. & Anr. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Date of the Judgment: 31st January 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source]

Supreme Court directs reconsideration of premature release policy for life convicts: Mata Prasad vs. State of U.P. (31 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top