Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (31 January 2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 14, Constitution of India with Article 226, Contract Law, Doctrine of Substantial Compliance, Foreign Funded Contracts, Judges, M.R. Shah, Tender Process

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the tender process of a foreign-funded project. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process, Foreign Funded Project Case Name: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. (31 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Fulzele (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(oo)(bb), Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-G, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 with Section 28

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Fulzele (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee is entitled to reinstatement and back wages upon termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele [Judgment Date]: 31

Supreme Court Modifies Reinstatement Order in Contractual Employment Case: MSRTC vs. Kalawati Fulzele (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Disqualification: Agmatel India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Resoursys Telecom & Ors. (2022)

/ Contract Law, Customs Act, 1950, Customs Act, 1950 with Section 151A, Dinesh Maheshwari, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Tender Process, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Disqualification: Agmatel India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Resoursys Telecom & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tender inviting authority’s interpretation of “same or similar category products” in a tender document can be challenged in court. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process Case Name: M/s Agmatel India Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s Resoursys Telecom

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Disqualification: Agmatel India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Resoursys Telecom & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (28 January 2022)

/ Arrears of Pay, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Implementation of Court Orders, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors Can the government delay payments to employees who won a legal battle? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, ensuring that arrears are paid to TV News Correspondents, Assistant News Correspondents, and Assistant News Editors. This case involves the Union of India

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Power of Attorney Holder: Amar Nath vs. Gian Chand (28 January 2022)

/ Agency, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 201, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 32, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 33

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Power of Attorney Holder: Amar Nath vs. Gian Chand (28 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sale deed executed by a power of attorney holder is valid when the principal claims the power of attorney was cancelled before the sale. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Power of Attorney Holder: Amar Nath vs. Gian Chand (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Power of Attorney Holder: Amar Nath vs. Gian Chand (28 January 2022)

/ Contract Act, Contract Act with Section 201, Contract Act with Section 207, Contract Act with Section 208, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 18A, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 32, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 33

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Power of Attorney Holder: Amar Nath vs. Gian Chand (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1062 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can a sale deed executed by a power of attorney holder be deemed invalid if the original power of

Supreme Court Upholds Sale Deed Executed by Power of Attorney Holder: Amar Nath vs. Gian Chand (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Non-Application of Mind: Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra (28 January 2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 151, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(d), Constitutional Law with Article 19(5), Fundamental Rights, Judges, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 with Section 56, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 with Section 58

Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Non-Application of Mind: Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an externment order passed under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, can be sustained if it lacks proper application of mind and is based on stale offenses. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Externment Order

Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order Due to Non-Application of Mind: Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes externment order due to lack of evidence and non-application of mind: Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 151, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(d), Constitutional Law with Article 19(5), Fundamental Rights, Judges, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 with Section 56, Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 with Section 58

Supreme Court quashes externment order due to lack of evidence and non-application of mind: Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an externment order passed under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, was valid when based on stale offenses and without proper application of mind. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name:

Supreme Court quashes externment order due to lack of evidence and non-application of mind: Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition in Compensation Dispute: Kundan Burnwal vs. Alok Jain (28 January 2022)

/ Civil Procedure, Compliance with Court Orders, Contempt of Court, Contempt Petition, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition in Compensation Dispute: Kundan Burnwal vs. Alok Jain (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contempt petition is maintainable when there is a dispute regarding the implementation of a previous court order regarding compensation. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court. Case Name: Kundan Burnwal & Anr vs. Alok Jain & Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition in Compensation Dispute: Kundan Burnwal vs. Alok Jain (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition in Land Dispute Case (28 January 2022)

/ Contempt of Court, Contempt of Court with Non-compliance, D.Y. Chandrachud, Enforcement of Orders, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition in Land Dispute Case (28 January 2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1112 Judges: Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Sanjiv Khanna Can a contempt petition be disposed of if the respondents agree to comply with the original judgment? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition in Land Dispute Case (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme: Directorate of Enforcement vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar (28 January 2022)

/ Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 with Section 1, Part A of the First Schedule, Financial Upgradation, Judges, M. R. Shah, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, Pension, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme: Directorate of Enforcement vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme regarding grade pay upon financial upgradation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr. vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar & Ors. Judgment Date: 28

Supreme Court clarifies Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme: Directorate of Enforcement vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction in landlord-tenant disputes under Haryana Rent Act: Subhash Chander & Ors. vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr. (28 January 2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976, Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976 with Section 11, Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976 with Section 5(2), Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 with Section 13, Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 with Section 2(h), Judges

Supreme Court on Jurisdiction in Landlord-Tenant Disputes: Subhash Chander vs. Bharat Petroleum (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for possession when the property is governed by the Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973. CASE TYPE: Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Property Law Case Name: Subhash Chander & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction in landlord-tenant disputes under Haryana Rent Act: Subhash Chander & Ors. vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr. (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top