Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of Fees and Taxes for State-Owned Liquor Corporation: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 289, Hrishikesh Roy, Income-tax Act, 1961, Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 143(3), Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 40, Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 40(a)(iib), Judges, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of Fees and Taxes for State-Owned Liquor Corporation: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether certain fees and taxes paid by a state-owned corporation are deductible expenses under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name: Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing & Marketing Corporation […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of Fees and Taxes for State-Owned Liquor Corporation: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022)

/ Amounts Not Deductible, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 289, Hrishikesh Roy, Income-tax Act, 1961, Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 40, Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 40(a)(iib), Judges, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court clarifies Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 03, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 4 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a state government undertaking claim deductions for fees paid to the state? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for employees refusing promotions in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022)

/ Approbate and Reprobate, Assured Career Progression Scheme, Doctrine, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Office Memorandum, Office Memorandum with 18.7.2001, Office Memorandum with 9.8.1999, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme: Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who refuse promotions are eligible for financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 3 January 2022 Introduction

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for employees refusing promotions in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of State Levies Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 289, Hrishikesh Roy, Income-tax Act, 1961, Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 143(3), Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 40, Income-tax Act, 1961 with Section 40(a)(iib), Judges, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of State Levies Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 03, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a state-owned corporation deduct payments made to the state government, such as license fees and

Supreme Court Clarifies Deductibility of State Levies Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income Tax Act: Kerala State Beverages vs. ACIT (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Assessment Orders: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. S. Pitchi Reddy (2022)

/ Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, Appellate Procedure, Assessment Orders, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court Upholds Assessment Orders: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. S. Pitchi Reddy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition against a fresh assessment order when an alternative remedy of appeal is available and when suo moto revisional proceedings are pending. CASE TYPE: Tax Law, specifically related to assessment orders

Supreme Court Upholds Assessment Orders: State of Andhra Pradesh vs. S. Pitchi Reddy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022)

/ Arbitral Award, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Recourse Against Arbitral Award

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration Act in I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 3, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1 Judges: R. Subhash Reddy, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a court send an arbitration award back to the arbitrator for clarification if the award

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: I-Pay Clearing Services vs. ICICI Bank (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022)

/ Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 35-A, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 441(2), Companies Act, 1956 with Section 531, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-JA, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45-MB

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directives regarding the transfer of bonds are binding on financial institutions. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Banking Law. Case Name: Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. M/s. Sibco Investment Pvt. Ltd. Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds RBI’s Authority in Bond Dispute: SIDBI vs. Sibco Investment (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction Under Section 498A IPC in Matrimonial Dispute After Settlement (3 January 2022)

/ Criminal Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, Matrimonial Disputes, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Matrimonial Dispute After Settlement LEGAL ISSUE: Can a conviction under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 be quashed if the parties have settled their matrimonial dispute and are living together harmoniously? CASE TYPE: Criminal Law (Matrimonial Dispute) Case Name: Rajendra Bhagat vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. [Judgment

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction Under Section 498A IPC in Matrimonial Dispute After Settlement (3 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 14

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings can be validated by ex-post facto approval from the disciplinary authority. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India & Anr.

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Bar Councils to Expedite Disciplinary Proceedings: K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy (2021)

/ Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 36B, B.V. Nagarathna, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M.R. Shah, Professional Misconduct

Supreme Court Directs Bar Councils to Expedite Disciplinary Proceedings: K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 17, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 7478 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. What happens when complaints against lawyers for misconduct languish for years without resolution? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court Directs Bar Councils to Expedite Disciplinary Proceedings: K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy (2021) Read Post »

Dowry Death: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Husband, Acquits Mother-in-law in Fulwa Devi Case (17 December 2021)

/ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Section 2, Hima Kohli, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 113B, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Dowry Death Conviction of Husband, Acquits Mother-in-law LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the accused were guilty of dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: Parvati Devi vs. The State of Bihar now State of Jharkhand & Ors. Judgment Date: 17 December 2021. Introduction Date of

Dowry Death: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Husband, Acquits Mother-in-law in Fulwa Devi Case (17 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court limits application of Section 397 IPC in robbery cases: Ram Ratan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) INSC 702 (17 December 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 392, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 397, Judges, Madhya Pradesh Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Pravbhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981, Madhya Pradesh Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Pravbhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 with Section 11, Madhya Pradesh Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Pravbhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981 with Section 13, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Property

Supreme Court limits application of Section 397 IPC in robbery cases: Ram Ratan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) INSC 702 (17 December 2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope and applicability of Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, concerning the use of deadly weapons during robbery. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Ram Ratan vs.

Supreme Court limits application of Section 397 IPC in robbery cases: Ram Ratan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) INSC 702 (17 December 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top