Judges

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision for Fresh Bar Association Elections: Amit Sachan & Anr. vs. Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (24 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Bar Association Elections, Election Law, Judges, M.R. Shah, One Bar One Vote, Professional Conduct, Professional Conduct

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision for Fresh Bar Association Elections: Amit Sachan & Anr. vs. Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in ordering fresh elections for the Awadh Bar Association due to unruly conduct during the previous election. CASE TYPE: Election Law/ Professional Conduct […]

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision for Fresh Bar Association Elections: Amit Sachan & Anr. vs. Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (24 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Corrects Order: Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure, Correction of Judgment, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges

Supreme Court Corrects Order: Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Correction of a clerical error in a previous judgment. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Mr. Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Maharashtra State, Pune & Ors. [Judgment Date]: November 18, 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: November 18, 2021. Citation:

Supreme Court Corrects Order: Rajeev Nohwar vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Abates Criminal Appeal Due to Death of Sole Respondent: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh (2021)

/ Abatement of Criminal Proceedings, C.T. Ravikumar, Criminal Law, Judges

Supreme Court Abates Criminal Appeal Due to Death of Sole Respondent: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Abatement of criminal appeal due to the death of the sole respondent. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh [Judgment Date]: 24 September 2021 Date of the Judgment: 24 September

Supreme Court Abates Criminal Appeal Due to Death of Sole Respondent: State of U.P. vs. Mithun Singh (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (23 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 18, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act with Section 6, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (2021) Date of the Judgment: 23 September 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 5738-5739 of 2021, Civil Appeal No. 5740 of 2021 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a court rectify a previous compensation

Supreme Court Revises Land Acquisition Compensation for NOIDA: Ajai Pal Singh & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Toll Plaza Location: NHAI vs. Madhukar Kumar (23 September 2021)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, National Highways Act, 1956, National Highways Act, 1956 with Section 7, National Highways Fee Rules, 2008, National Highways Fee Rules, 2008 with Rule 8, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Toll Plaza Location: NHAI vs. Madhukar Kumar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Rule 8 of the National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008, regarding the location of toll plazas. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal (National Highways Law) Case Name: National Highways Authority of India & Others vs. Madhukar Kumar &

Supreme Court Upholds Toll Plaza Location: NHAI vs. Madhukar Kumar (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonor Case: Triyambak S. Hegde vs. Sripad (23 September 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 200, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 313, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 118, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 139, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonor Case: Triyambak S. Hegde vs. Sripad (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, that a cheque was issued for the discharge of a debt or liability, was successfully rebutted by the respondent. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal (Cheque Dishonor) Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonor Case: Triyambak S. Hegde vs. Sripad (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Delay and Merits: Bihari vs. State of U.P. (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Appeal, Civil Law, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Special Leave Petition

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Delay and Merits: Bihari vs. State of U.P. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a special leave petition challenging the enhancement of land acquisition compensation should be dismissed due to significant delay and lack of merit. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Bihari (Dead) through Lrs. and others

Supreme Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Appeal Due to Delay and Merits: Bihari vs. State of U.P. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Jamia Masjid vs. K V Rudrappa (23 September 2021)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 23, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Judges, Res Judicata, Vikram Nath, Wakf Act, 1954, Wakf Act, 1954 with Notifications, Wakf Properties

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Jamia Masjid vs. K V Rudrappa (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Res Judicata in property disputes, particularly concerning representative suits and compromise decrees. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: The Jamia Masjid vs. Sri K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs. & Ors. Judgment Date: 23 September 2021

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Jamia Masjid vs. K V Rudrappa (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies MSMED Act Procedure: Vijeta Construction vs. Indus Smelters Ltd. (2021)

/ A. S. Bopanna, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Sections 65 to 81, Conciliation, Judges, M. R. Shah, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 with Section 15, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 with Section 18, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 with Section 24

Supreme Court Clarifies MSMED Act Procedure: Vijeta Construction vs. Indus Smelters Ltd. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for dispute resolution under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s Vijeta Construction vs. M/s Indus Smelters Ltd. & Anr. Judgment Date: 23 September 2021 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Clarifies MSMED Act Procedure: Vijeta Construction vs. Indus Smelters Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Extends Limitation Period Due to COVID-19: In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (23 September 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 23(4), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 29A, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Commercial Courts Act, 2015 with Section 12A, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 141, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, N.V. Ramana, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Extends Limitation Period Due to COVID-19: In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Extension of limitation period for legal proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation. Case Name: In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation. Judgment Date: 23 September 2021 Date of the Judgment: 23 September

Supreme Court Extends Limitation Period Due to COVID-19: In Re Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (23 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act in Sri Dorairaj Spintex vs R Chittibabu (22 September 2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Conciliation Proceedings, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Employer Rights, Industrial Dispute, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 33, Judges, Labour Law, Vikram Nath, Workmen Rights

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act in Sri Dorairaj Spintex vs R Chittibabu LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, specifically concerning the conditions under which an employer can take disciplinary action against workmen

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act in Sri Dorairaj Spintex vs R Chittibabu (22 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under Construction Management Agreements: DLF Home Developers vs. Rajapura Homes (22 September 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11(6), Breach of contract, Construction Management Agreement, Contract Law, International Commercial Arbitration, Judges, Kompetenz Kompetenz, N.V. Ramana, Share Purchase Agreement, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability of Disputes Under Construction Management Agreements: DLF Home Developers vs. Rajapura Homes (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disputes arising from Construction Management Agreements can be referred to arbitration under the arbitration clause of the Construction Management Agreements, or whether they fall under the ambit of the Share Purchase Agreements. CASE TYPE: Arbitration

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under Construction Management Agreements: DLF Home Developers vs. Rajapura Homes (22 September 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top