“`html Date of the Judgment: May 09, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 678 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Augustine George Masih, J. Can a government official, found guilty of contempt of court for demolishing homes despite court orders, have their sentence modified to protect their family’s livelihood? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the […]
LEGAL ISSUE: Arbitrability of disputes involving trademark rights arising from contractual agreements. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Trademark Law. Case Name: K. Mangayarkarasi & Anr. vs. N.J. Sundaresan & Anr. [Judgment Date]: May 9, 2025 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 9, 2025 The Supreme Court of India recently addressed the question of whether a dispute
Date of the Judgment: May 08, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 649 Judges: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., K. Vinod Chandran, J. In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed a case where a wife filed a complaint against her husband and his family, alleging harassment and demand for dowry. The High Court of Allahabad had
Date of the Judgment: May 08, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 648 Judges: Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of fair compensation in motor accident claims, specifically focusing on a case involving grievous injuries and amputation. The court considered the adequacy of compensation
Date of the Judgment: May 08, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 652 Judges: Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Joymalya Bagchi Can an unregistered sale deed be used as evidence in a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question in the case of Muruganandam vs.
Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 08, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 653 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J., Joymalya Bagchi, J. Can good intentions excuse procedural missteps? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving social workers accused of obstructing public officials during a rescue operation. The court ultimately quashed the
Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2025 The Supreme Court of India recently heard appeals concerning P. Nallammal and the State of Tamil Nadu, focusing on charges of corruption and abetment. The central question revolved around whether a wife could be held guilty of abetting her husband’s accumulation of disproportionate assets. Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and
Date of the Judgment: May 7, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 639 Judges: J.B. Pardiwala, J., R. Mahadevan, J. Can the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) condone delays exceeding the statutorily prescribed limit for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in the case of Tata
Date of the Judgment: 07 May 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 638 Judges: Surya Kant, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J. When the government acquires land for public purposes, how should the compensation be determined, especially when the acquired land is near major infrastructure? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a recent case involving land acquired in
Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 702 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Sanjay Karol, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. In a shocking turn of events, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the conviction of an accused in a rape and murder case, citing a “shabby and perfunctory investigation.” The case, Ramkirat
Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2025 Judges: Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J., Abhay S. Oka, J. Can a disability pension be denied solely based on a medical board’s opinion without detailed reasoning? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a recent case concerning an army veteran diagnosed with Schizophrenia. The court
Date of the Judgment: May 07, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 641 Judges: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Justice K. Vinod Chandran In a case concerning a serious motor accident, the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of determining just compensation for accident victims, particularly focusing on those who suffer permanent disabilities. The case involved an appellant who
