Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has discretion to reject an application for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IB Code) once a financial debt […]

Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 11, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 521 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a corporate debtor avoid insolvency proceedings by claiming the creditor should have extended bank guarantees? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Admission of Insolvency Application: M. Suresh Kumar Reddy vs. Canara Bank (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Late Rent Payment Under Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Act: K. Chinnammal vs. L.R. Eknath (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Late Rent Payment Under Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Act: K. Chinnammal vs. L.R. Eknath (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can be evicted for failing to pay rent within the stipulated time despite a subsequent deposit, under the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955. CASE TYPE: Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Eviction,

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Late Rent Payment Under Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Act: K. Chinnammal vs. L.R. Eknath (2023) Read Post »

State’s Right to Challenge Central Laws: Supreme Court Addresses Maintainability of Meghalaya’s Suit on Lottery Regulations (2023)

Supreme Court Addresses State’s Right to Challenge Central Lottery Laws: Meghalaya vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State can challenge the constitutional validity of a Central law under Article 131 of the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Original Suit Case Name: State of Meghalaya vs. Union of India & Others

State’s Right to Challenge Central Laws: Supreme Court Addresses Maintainability of Meghalaya’s Suit on Lottery Regulations (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Stays Project-Wise Insolvency Resolution: Indiabulls vs. Ram Kishore (2023)

Supreme Court Stays Project-Wise Insolvency Resolution: Indiabulls vs. Ram Kishore (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) can order a project-wise insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law Case Name: Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Limited vs. Ram Kishore Arora & Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Stays Project-Wise Insolvency Resolution: Indiabulls vs. Ram Kishore (2023) Read Post »

Limitation for Delivery of Possession: Supreme Court refers the issue to Larger Bench in Bhasker & Anr. vs. Ayodhya Jewellers (2023)

Supreme Court refers the issue of limitation for delivery of possession to a larger bench: Bhasker & Anr. vs. Ayodhya Jewellers (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: What is the correct starting point for calculating the limitation period for an application seeking delivery of possession of property purchased in a court auction? CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Execution of

Limitation for Delivery of Possession: Supreme Court refers the issue to Larger Bench in Bhasker & Anr. vs. Ayodhya Jewellers (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case: Gulam Mustafa vs. State of Karnataka (2023)

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case: Gulam Mustafa vs. State of Karnataka (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal FIR can be quashed when it arises from a civil dispute and is used to exert pressure, especially when there’s a significant delay in raising the dispute and the allegations under the SC/ST Act appear

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case: Gulam Mustafa vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case: Gulam Mustafa vs. State of Karnataka (2023)

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case: Gulam Mustafa vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 5112 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J. and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. Can a long-standing civil dispute over land ownership justify a criminal complaint? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question,

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case: Gulam Mustafa vs. State of Karnataka (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Central and State laws in Scheduled Areas: Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs. Union of India (2023)

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Central and State laws in Scheduled Areas: Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Central and State laws automatically apply to Scheduled Areas, or if they require specific notifications by the Governor. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, specifically concerning the Fifth Schedule of

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Central and State laws in Scheduled Areas: Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Laws in Scheduled Areas: Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs. Union of India (2023)

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Laws in Scheduled Areas: Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Central and State laws automatically apply to Scheduled Areas, or require specific notifications by the Governor. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, specifically concerning the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution. Case Name: Adivasis

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Laws in Scheduled Areas: Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Probation in Essential Commodities Act Case After 37 Years

Supreme Court Grants Probation in Essential Commodities Act Case After 37 Years LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person convicted under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 can be granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, despite a minimum sentence prescribed in the Essential Commodities Act. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Tarak Nath Keshari vs.

Supreme Court Grants Probation in Essential Commodities Act Case After 37 Years Read Post »

Supreme Court grants probation in Essential Commodities Act case: Tarak Nath Keshari vs. State of West Bengal (2023)

Supreme Court grants probation in Essential Commodities Act case: Tarak Nath Keshari vs. State of West Bengal (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 513 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a person convicted under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 be released on probation? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court grants probation in Essential Commodities Act case: Tarak Nath Keshari vs. State of West Bengal (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top