Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Reduced Pot Kharab Land in Maharashtra Ceiling Act Case

/ Deepak Gupta, Judges, Land Ceiling Law, Madan B. Lokur, Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961, Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 with pot kharab

Supreme Court Upholds Reduced Pot Kharab Land in Maharashtra Ceiling Act Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of Pot Kharab Land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Land Ceiling Law Case Name: Vishwasrao Satwarao Naik & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra [Judgment Date]: April 25, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Reduced Pot Kharab Land in Maharashtra Ceiling Act Case Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Tenant Eviction Dispute with Settlement: Rajesh Chugh & Anr. vs. Batuk Prasad Jaitly (25 April 2018)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 89, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Landlord-Tenant Disputes, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Settlement

Supreme Court Settles Tenant Eviction Dispute with Settlement: Rajesh Chugh & Anr. vs. Batuk Prasad Jaitly (2018) Date of the Judgment: 25 April 2018 Citation: Rajesh Chugh & Anr. vs. Batuk Prasad Jaitly, Civil Appeal No(s). 4419 of 2018 (Arising from SLP (C) No(s).21429/2017) Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J., Navin Sinha, J.

Supreme Court Settles Tenant Eviction Dispute with Settlement: Rajesh Chugh & Anr. vs. Batuk Prasad Jaitly (25 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in Assault Case: Naresh & Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand (25 April 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in Assault Case: Naresh & Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the order of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge and convicting the appellants for offences under Sections 307/34, 323/34, 324/34 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. CASE

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in Assault Case: Naresh & Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand (25 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Framing of Charges in Corruption Case, Directs Trial Court to Proceed: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (25 April 2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Corruption, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with powers of appellate courts, Framing of Charges, Judges, Offences relating to corruption, Rohinton Fali Nariman

Supreme Court Upholds Framing of Charges in Corruption Case, Directs Trial Court to Proceed Date of the Judgment: 25 April 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. and Rohinton Fali Nariman, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal against the framing of charges in a corruption case. The core issue was

Supreme Court Upholds Framing of Charges in Corruption Case, Directs Trial Court to Proceed: Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (25 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismisses Title Suit: Y.P. Sudhanva Reddy vs. Karnataka Milk Federation (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order 41 Rule 27-A, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, R.K. Agrawal, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismisses Title Suit: Y.P. Sudhanva Reddy vs. Karnataka Milk Federation (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction is maintainable when the land has already been acquired by the government under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Land Acquisition Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Dismisses Title Suit: Y.P. Sudhanva Reddy vs. Karnataka Milk Federation (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Non-Compliance with Section 15(2) of the 2013 Act: Shiv Singh & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (25 April 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 11, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 15

Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Non-Compliance with Section 15(2) of the 2013 Act: Shiv Singh & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (2018) Date of the Judgment: 25 April 2018 Citation: Shiv Singh & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (2018) INSC 341 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre,

Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Non-Compliance with Section 15(2) of the 2013 Act: Shiv Singh & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (25 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies taxability of loan waivers: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Case (24 April 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 28(iv), Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 41(1), Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Loan Waivers: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Case (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a loan waiver constitutes taxable income under the Income Tax Act, 1961. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law. Case Name: The Commissioner vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Judgment Date: 24 April 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 24 April 2018

Supreme Court clarifies taxability of loan waivers: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Case (24 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Second Notice under Section 158BD of IT Act in Income Tax Assessment: Tapan Kumar Dutta vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Block Assessment, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 158BC, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 158BD, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds Second Notice under Section 158BD of IT Act in Income Tax Assessment: Tapan Kumar Dutta vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of a second notice issued under Section 158BD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when a prior notice under Section 158BC was already issued to the same assessee.

Supreme Court Upholds Second Notice under Section 158BD of IT Act in Income Tax Assessment: Tapan Kumar Dutta vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Income Tax: TechSpan India Pvt. Ltd. (2018)

/ Assessment, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 147, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 148, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Income Tax: TechSpan India Pvt. Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the reopening of a completed assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is justified based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Case Name: Income Tax Officer Ward No.

Supreme Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Income Tax: TechSpan India Pvt. Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Deduction Under Section 80-O of Income Tax Act: B.L. Passi vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (24 April 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 80-O, Judges, R.K. Agrawal, Tax Deductions, Technical Services

Supreme Court Denies Deduction Under Section 80-O of Income Tax Act: B.L. Passi vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the assessee is entitled to a deduction under Section 80-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for providing commercial and industrial information to a foreign company. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Denies Deduction Under Section 80-O of Income Tax Act: B.L. Passi vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (24 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies taxability of interest on share application money: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 147, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 240, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 44AB, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court on Taxability of Interest on Share Application Money: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether interest earned on share application money is taxable income. CASE TYPE: Income Tax. Case Name: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Ahmedabad vs. M/s. Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd. [Judgment Date]: 24

Supreme Court clarifies taxability of interest on share application money: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory: Cheran Properties vs. Kasturi & Sons (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 35, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 36, Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 111, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Rectification of Register

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory: Cheran Properties vs. Kasturi & Sons (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral award can be enforced against a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement, particularly a nominee of a party to the agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration and Company Law Case Name: Cheran Properties Limited vs. Kasturi and Sons Limited

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory: Cheran Properties vs. Kasturi & Sons (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top