Judges

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Bhartiben Nayabha Ker vs. Sidabha Pethabha Manke (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Motor Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Bhartiben Nayabha Ker vs. Sidabha Pethabha Manke (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of compensation in motor accident claims, including future prospects and interest rates. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: Bhartiben Nayabha Ker and Ors. vs. Sidabha Pethabha Manke and Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 5, 2018 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Bhartiben Nayabha Ker vs. Sidabha Pethabha Manke (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Irrevocability of Voluntary Retirement Scheme: State Bank of Patiala vs. Kanwal Nain Singh (2018)

/ Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Service Law, Service Law with Clause 9 of VRS, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Irrevocability of Voluntary Retirement Scheme: State Bank of Patiala vs. Kanwal Nain Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can withdraw their application for voluntary retirement after submitting it, when the scheme specifies the application is irrevocable. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of Patiala & Ors. vs. Kanwal Nain

Supreme Court Upholds Irrevocability of Voluntary Retirement Scheme: State Bank of Patiala vs. Kanwal Nain Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs Allahabad High Court to expedite Police Constable selection cases: Ashish Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) INSC 276

/ Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Selection Process, Service Law

Supreme Court directs Allahabad High Court to expedite Police Constable selection cases: Ashish Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) INSC 276 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the candidates for the post of Police Constable, who allegedly used whitener/blade/eraser, are entitled to similar treatment as Sub-Inspectors in the matter of selection, as per the Supreme Court’s

Supreme Court directs Allahabad High Court to expedite Police Constable selection cases: Ashish Kumar Yadav vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) INSC 276 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Commission Payments to Advertising Agencies: Prasar Bharati vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Commission, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 194H, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 201, Judges, R.K. Agrawal

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Commission Payments to Advertising Agencies: Prasar Bharati vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 03, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 258 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can payments made by a television channel to advertising agencies be considered as “commission,” thus requiring

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction on Commission Payments to Advertising Agencies: Prasar Bharati vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on merits the issue of regularization of contract workers: ONGC Purbanchal Employees Association vs. Union of India (2018)

/ Contract Labour Act, 1970, Contract Labour Act, 1970 with Section 10, Industrial Dispute, Judges, Judicial Review, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Regularization of Contract Workers

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on merits the issue of regularization of contract workers: ONGC Purbanchal Employees Association vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was right in remitting the industrial dispute regarding regularization of contract workers to the Industrial Tribunal for fresh consideration. CASE

Supreme Court directs High Court to decide on merits the issue of regularization of contract workers: ONGC Purbanchal Employees Association vs. Union of India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Property Dispute Through Mediation: M. Kuppaswamy vs. R. Vandana (2 April 2018)

/ Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mediation, Navin Sinha, Settlement

Supreme Court Disposes of Property Dispute Through Mediation: M. Kuppaswamy vs. R. Vandana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Resolution of property disputes through mediation. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: M. Kuppaswamy (D) Tr. Lrs. vs. R. Vandana. Judgment Date: 2 April 2018. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 2 April 2018. Citation: Not Available. Judges: Kurian Joseph, J.

Supreme Court Disposes of Property Dispute Through Mediation: M. Kuppaswamy vs. R. Vandana (2 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

/ Administrative Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Navin Sinha, Principles of Natural Justice, Right to be Heard, Service Law, Show Cause Notice, Termination of Service

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 2, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 266 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can an employee be terminated from service without being given a chance to explain their case? The

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court remands land acquisition compensation case to High Court: Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana (2 April 2018)

/ Compensation, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, Navin Sinha, Remand

Supreme Court remands land acquisition compensation case to High Court: Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana (2018) Date of the Judgment: 2 April 2018 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Navin Sinha, J. Can a case regarding compensation for acquired land be sent back to the High Court for reconsideration? The Supreme Court addressed this question

Supreme Court remands land acquisition compensation case to High Court: Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana (2 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Resolves Family Dispute: Lakshmi vs. Chamundamma (2018)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Family Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Navin Sinha, Property Dispute, Settlement

Supreme Court Resolves Family Dispute: Lakshmi vs. Chamundamma (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 2, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can a long-standing family dispute be resolved through compassionate means? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving two ‘wives’ of a deceased man, ultimately

Supreme Court Resolves Family Dispute: Lakshmi vs. Chamundamma (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Consideration of Compassionate Appointment: Chandrabosh Tripathi vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (2018)

/ Compassionate Appointment, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Navin Sinha, Reconsideration of Application, Service Law

Supreme Court Directs Consideration of Compassionate Appointment: Chandrabosh Tripathi vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellant’s application for compassionate appointment should be considered despite previous rejections. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Compassionate Appointment Case Name: Chandrabosh Tripathi vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board & Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 02, 2018 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Directs Consideration of Compassionate Appointment: Chandrabosh Tripathi vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (2018) Read Post »

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Lease Dispute: Supreme Court Intervention in Property Lease (28 March 2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Contract Law, Contract Law with Breach of Contract, Dipak Misra, Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994, Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 with Section 157, Judges, Lease Agreements

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Lease Dispute: Supreme Court Judgment (2018) Date of the Judgment: 28 March 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 229 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J. Can a High Court order a public tender for a property that is already under a valid lease agreement? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Lease Dispute: Supreme Court Intervention in Property Lease (28 March 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Criminal Cases: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 376, Judges, Navin Sinha, Offences Against Human Body, Offences Against Women and Children, Railways Act, Railways Act with Section 145(B), Rohinton Fali Nariman, Transfer of Cases

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Criminal Cases: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether criminal cases should be transferred from one jurisdiction to another based on the petitioner’s convenience. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi and Others Judgment Date: March 28,

Supreme Court Denies Transfer of Criminal Cases: Harita Sunil Parab vs. State of NCT of Delhi (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top