Judges

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Conviction in Rape Case, Sets Aside SC/ST Act Conviction: Asharfi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (8 December 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 8 December 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J. and R. Banumathi, J. Can a conviction under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 be upheld if the prosecution fails to prove that the crime was committed specifically because the victim belonged to a […]

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Conviction in Rape Case, Sets Aside SC/ST Act Conviction: Asharfi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (8 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Co-Bhumidari Rights in Land Dispute: Vijay Kumar vs. Bal Krishan (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of co-bhumidari rights in jointly purchased land. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Revenue Dispute Case Name: Vijay Kumar and Another vs. Bal Krishan and Others [Judgment Date]: December 8, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 8, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 999 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can a

Supreme Court Upholds Co-Bhumidari Rights in Land Dispute: Vijay Kumar vs. Bal Krishan (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules on Insurance Claim After Truck Theft: Manjeet Singh vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company can deny a claim for vehicle theft based on a minor breach of policy conditions, such as giving a lift to passengers. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law/Insurance Law Case Name: Manjeet Singh vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. Judgment Date: 8 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 8 December

Supreme Court Rules on Insurance Claim After Truck Theft: Manjeet Singh vs. National Insurance Company Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award of Interest: Union of India vs. M/s. Susaka Pvt. Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can award interest on claims when the contract contains a clause prohibiting interest, and whether such an issue can be raised for the first time in appeal. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Union of India vs. M/s. Susaka Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 08 December 2017 Date

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award of Interest: Union of India vs. M/s. Susaka Pvt. Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restriction on Under-Raiyat Land Transfers: Aftaruddin vs. Ramkrishna Datta (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an under-raiyat can transfer their land rights despite a statutory bar. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Rights. Case Name: Aftaruddin (Dead) Rep. Thr. Lrs. vs. Ramkrishna Datta alias Babul Datta & Ors. Judgment Date: 08 December 2017 Can an under-raiyat, a tenant-like landholder, transfer their land rights despite legal restrictions? The

Supreme Court Upholds Restriction on Under-Raiyat Land Transfers: Aftaruddin vs. Ramkrishna Datta (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing Summons in Land Fraud Case: Prabhu Dutt Tiwari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of Magistrate’s powers at the summoning stage in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Prabhu Dutt Tiwari vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: December 7, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 7, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 1045 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing Summons in Land Fraud Case: Prabhu Dutt Tiwari vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Navjyot Singh vs. DTC (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of compensation in motor accident cases, specifically regarding the addition of future prospects to income and the computation of actual income. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Navjyot Singh & Ors. vs. D.T.C. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: December 7, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 7, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Navjyot Singh vs. DTC (2017) Read Post »

Land Acquisition Lapse under the 2013 Act: Supreme Court Refers Issue to Larger Bench in Indore Development Authority vs. Shailendra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is not deposited in court but with the Land Acquisition Collector. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Indore Development Authority vs. Shailendra (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors.

Land Acquisition Lapse under the 2013 Act: Supreme Court Refers Issue to Larger Bench in Indore Development Authority vs. Shailendra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Power to Summon Additional Documents at Charge Framing Stage: Nitya Dharmananda vs. Sri Gopal Sheelum Reddy (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can summon documents not included in the charge sheet at the stage of framing charges under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Nitya Dharmananda @ K. Lenin & Anr. vs. Sri Gopal Sheelum Reddy Also Known As Nithya Bhaktananda and Anr.

Supreme Court Clarifies Power to Summon Additional Documents at Charge Framing Stage: Nitya Dharmananda vs. Sri Gopal Sheelum Reddy (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies property tax as rent for eviction under Delhi Rent Control Act: Atma Ram Properties vs. Oriental Insurance (2017) INSC 989 (06 December 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 989 Judges: J. Chelameswar, S. Abdul Nazeer Can a landlord use the non-payment of property tax by a tenant, which the landlord is entitled to recover as rent, as grounds for eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court clarifies property tax as rent for eviction under Delhi Rent Control Act: Atma Ram Properties vs. Oriental Insurance (2017) INSC 989 (06 December 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court in Child Custody Battle: Prateek Gupta vs. Shilpi Gupta (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of comity of courts and the doctrines of “intimate contact” and “closest concern” should take precedence over the welfare of the child in international child custody disputes. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Child Custody, Habeas Corpus Case Name: Prateek Gupta vs. Shilpi Gupta & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 6 December 2017 Introduction

Supreme Court Overturns Delhi High Court in Child Custody Battle: Prateek Gupta vs. Shilpi Gupta (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Finality to Land Acquisition: H.N. Jagannath vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court can decide on the validity of land acquisition notifications and proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: H. N. Jagannath & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Judgment Date: 06 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 1049 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Mohan

Supreme Court Restores Finality to Land Acquisition: H.N. Jagannath vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top