Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Ownership Rights, Rejects Adverse Possession Claim in Property Dispute

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the defendant had successfully established a claim of adverse possession over a portion of the suit property. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Law Case Name: Narendra & Ors. vs. Ajabrao s/o Narayan Katare (D) Through LRs. Judgment Date: 26 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2017 Citation: [Not Available in Source] […]

Supreme Court Upholds Ownership Rights, Rejects Adverse Possession Claim in Property Dispute Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Inherent Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions in Tariff Disputes: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (25 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission can extend the control period of a tariff order by using its inherent powers. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law, Regulatory Law Case Name: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (India) Private Limited and Others Judgment Date: 25 October 2017 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Limits Inherent Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions in Tariff Disputes: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules against forfeiture of security deposit in auction case: Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of M.P. (25 October 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 25 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 923 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can a government body forfeit a security deposit when the terms of the auction were not fully disclosed? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a public auction of land.

Supreme Court rules against forfeiture of security deposit in auction case: Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of M.P. (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide: Pooranlal & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the acquittal of the accused and convicting them for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: Pooranlal & Anr. vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh Judgment Date: 25 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 25 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide: Pooranlal & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court restores rape conviction in case of deaf and dumb victim: State of Maharashtra vs. Bandu (24 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the testimony of a deaf and dumb, mentally challenged rape victim is essential for conviction when other evidence exists. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra vs. Bandu @ Daulat Judgment Date: 24 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 24 October 2017 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1820 of

Supreme Court restores rape conviction in case of deaf and dumb victim: State of Maharashtra vs. Bandu (24 October 2017) Read Post »

Impleadment of Assignee After 27 Years Denied: Supreme Court on Specific Performance Suits – LIC vs. Sanjeev Builders (24 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an assignee can be impleaded in a suit for specific performance after an inordinate delay. CASE TYPE: Civil – Specific Performance. Case Name: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sanjeev Builders Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. [Judgment Date]: 24 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 24 October 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. of

Impleadment of Assignee After 27 Years Denied: Supreme Court on Specific Performance Suits – LIC vs. Sanjeev Builders (24 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Pradip Kumar Ghosh (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings initiated after a prior requisition order are valid, especially when a High Court had directed the release of the property if not acquired within a specified time. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case Name: Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Pradip Kumar Ghosh & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 October 2017

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority vs. Pradip Kumar Ghosh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Permanent Establishment (PE) norms in India-US DTAA: Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. E-Funds IT Solution Inc. (24 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a foreign company has a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, making it liable for taxation in India under the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). CASE TYPE: International Taxation Case Name: Assistant Director of Income Tax-I, New Delhi vs. M/s E-Funds IT Solution Inc. Judgment Date: 24 October 2017 Date of the

Supreme Court clarifies Permanent Establishment (PE) norms in India-US DTAA: Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. E-Funds IT Solution Inc. (24 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Limitation Act applicability on appeals under Section 30 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act: International Asset Reconstruction Company vs. The Official Liquidator (24 October 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 24 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 942 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can the delay in filing an appeal against a Recovery Officer’s order under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 be condoned by applying Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963? This

Supreme Court settles Limitation Act applicability on appeals under Section 30 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act: International Asset Reconstruction Company vs. The Official Liquidator (24 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Mortgage vs. Sale with Repurchase Option: Suraj Narain Kapoor vs. Pradeep Kumar (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 24, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 834 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can a document that includes a clause for repurchase of property be considered a mortgage, or is it simply a sale with an option to buy back? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this complex question

Supreme Court Clarifies Mortgage vs. Sale with Repurchase Option: Suraj Narain Kapoor vs. Pradeep Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Government’s Right to Resume Land Under Old Grant: Union of India vs. Vijay Krishna Uniyal (23 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court, after upholding a lower court’s finding on land ownership, can make observations that could potentially reopen the settled issue of title. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Land Resumption Case Name: Union of India vs. Vijay Krishna Uniyal (D) through L.Rs. Judgment Date: 23 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 23

Supreme Court Upholds Government’s Right to Resume Land Under Old Grant: Union of India vs. Vijay Krishna Uniyal (23 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies District Mineral Foundation contributions in mining law: Federation of Indian Mineral Industries vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the establishment and funding of District Mineral Foundations (DMFs) under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and whether contributions to these funds could be applied retrospectively. CASE TYPE: This case falls under the ambit of mining and mineral law, specifically concerning the financial obligations

Supreme Court clarifies District Mineral Foundation contributions in mining law: Federation of Indian Mineral Industries vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top