Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Land and Building Method for Cinema Valuation in Wealth Tax Assessment (October 13, 2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 13, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 939 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. When assessing wealth tax, how should a cinema building be valued? Should it be based on its income or the value of the land and building? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, clarifying the […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land and Building Method for Cinema Valuation in Wealth Tax Assessment (October 13, 2017) Read Post »

Sabarimala Temple Entry Ban on Women to be Examined by Larger Bench: Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. State of Kerala (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prohibition on women of a specific age group from entering the Sabarimala Temple is discriminatory and violates fundamental rights. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law, Religious Law Case Name: Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors. vs. State of Kerala & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 October 2017 Introduction Date of the

Sabarimala Temple Entry Ban on Women to be Examined by Larger Bench: Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. State of Kerala (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Eviction Disputes: Himangni Enterprises vs. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia (2017)

Can a civil court hear an eviction suit when the lease agreement has an arbitration clause? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Himangni Enterprises vs. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia. This case clarifies that eviction matters, especially those involving statutory protections for tenants, fall under the jurisdiction of civil courts, not arbitrators. The

Supreme Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Eviction Disputes: Himangni Enterprises vs. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Excise Duty on Marketable Agarbathi Perfume: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether excise duty is applicable on perfumery compounds used in agarbathi manufacturing, and whether actual marketing is necessary for levying such duty. CASE TYPE: Excise Law Case Name: Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Bangalore vs. M/s Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd. [Judgment Date]: 12 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Upholds Excise Duty on Marketable Agarbathi Perfume: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Against Builder for Selling Shop Already Booked: Kusum Agarwal vs. Harsha Associates (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Deficiency in service by a builder for selling a property already booked to another customer. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Kusum Agarwal & Anr. vs. M/s Harsha Associates Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 12 October 2017 Can a builder sell a property to someone else after it has already been booked by a

Supreme Court Rules Against Builder for Selling Shop Already Booked: Kusum Agarwal vs. Harsha Associates (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overhauls Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Establishing a fair and transparent process for designating Senior Advocates. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Ms. Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India Through Secretary General And Ors. Judgment Date: 12 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 837 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., Rohinton Fali Nariman,

Supreme Court Overhauls Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Back Wages to Reinstated Employee: Karupaiah vs. Thruuvalluvar Transport Corporation (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is automatically entitled to back wages upon reinstatement after being acquitted of a criminal charge. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: P. Karupaiah (D) Thr.Lrs. vs. The General Manager Thruuvalluvar Transport Corporation Ltd. Judgment Date: 12 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 884 Judges:

Supreme Court Denies Back Wages to Reinstated Employee: Karupaiah vs. Thruuvalluvar Transport Corporation (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overhauls Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2017)

Can the process of designating Senior Advocates be made more objective and transparent? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India, a landmark judgment that has reshaped the criteria and procedure for designating Senior Advocates. This case, decided on October 12, 2017, not only examined the

Supreme Court Overhauls Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Basic Pay on Absorption: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Prativa Biswas (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether basic pay of employees can be reduced upon absorption into a new company, when the terms of absorption guaranteed protection of existing pay and emoluments. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. & Ors. vs. Prativa Biswas & Ors. Judgment Date: 11 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 11

Supreme Court Protects Basic Pay on Absorption: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Prativa Biswas (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Litigation Expenses to Reinstated Constables: Deepak Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Entitlement of back wages and continuity of service for police constables whose termination was deemed illegal. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Deepak Kumar & Ors. vs. Principal Secretary Home, Govt. of U.P Lucknow (U.P) & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 904

Supreme Court Grants Litigation Expenses to Reinstated Constables: Deepak Kumar vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Multiple Arbitral Tribunals Allowed: Supreme Court Decision in Duro Felguera vs. Gangavaram Port (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a single arbitral tribunal can be constituted for multiple contracts arising from the same project, or if separate tribunals are required for each contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. Duro Felguera, S.A. vs. M/s. Gangavaram Port Limited Judgment Date: 10 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017

Multiple Arbitral Tribunals Allowed: Supreme Court Decision in Duro Felguera vs. Gangavaram Port (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Patta: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can claim permanent injunction on the basis of a Patta granted to their predecessor-in-title. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal & Anr. Judgment Date: 10 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No.10833 of 2010 Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Patta: Nagar Palika Raisinghnagar vs. Rameshwar Lal (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top